Alumbrado
Posts: 5560
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Thadius Anyways, back to the original topic at hand, Sen. Obama. I am still waiting for you to cite a single law that was authored by the "savior" of the Democratic party, I even moved the standard down to include his time in the Illinois Senate. I am looking to be able to make a decision on some tangible proof that he has anything resembling the skill to get express his ideas legislatively, or more importantly get the legislature to take those seriously enough to pass them. Until then it is nothing more than rhetoric. Charisma and passion are great, but if there is no substance behind it, what is it worth? Just my opinions, (passes out the salt) Thadius Thanks for the salt... but is that really that way things get done in the legislature? I thought bribery, thuggery, and chicanery were the stock in trade, and that bills got passed because they were favored by the most powerful lobbys, not because twuly noble and honorable leaders exercised their mythic skills at crafting and negotiating excellent legislation. By that token wouldn't being on record as a success at that sort of thing run counter to claims of being a change agent? As is stands right now, primarily because of lack of such evidence, I see the chances of Obama being just another status quo protecting, business as ususal, corrupt career politican as around 90% With McCain it is 100% certain.
|