Madame4a
Posts: 2045
Joined: 2/4/2008 From: Washington, DC area Status: offline
|
I think its fairly difficult to distinguish between fetish/kink when you're talking about cross dressing -- and do you mean real cross dressing or someone attempting to live as a woman? There are so many variations, you never know. I take 'no fetish attire' to mean dress like you would when you're going out with co workers (for the most part, there are exceptions) or bio family. As in, we're going to Olive Garden, not play space. The CDs I know generally dress very vanilla even in play space so I don't think it violates anything. There are cross dressers all over, drag queens, transgendered people.. you name it... if cross dressing is considered a fetish and not allowed at a munch, then I have to ask, my boi, who dresses like your average firefighter (male) but is very much female -- would that be considered a fetish and would she be uninvited to such a thing? Its all very difficult and full of some very gray areas... quote:
ORIGINAL: CruelDesires quote:
ORIGINAL: RedMagic1 Sure it's a kink. I had a "vanilla" gf who loved it when I dressed in a miniskirt in the bedroom. Only time I've ever crossdressed, and it was her idea. One of those "hmmmm" kinda situations. I've mostly heard it called a "fetish" tho. As in, "sub men attending event X will either dress in a collar or in fetish." If it is considered a fetish by many, I am curious as to why they allow people to express that fetish at "No fetish attire allowed" munches. That was always something that seemed to me to be a double standard that was allowed by many munches in the community as a whole. I am curious to hear other people opinions on the subject. :-) CD
_____________________________
You're crazy bitch But you f*ck so good, I'm on top of it When I dream, I'm doing you all night Scratches all down my back to keep me right on
|