Termyn8or -> RE: Obama to accept nomination in football stadium (7/8/2008 7:37:00 PM)
|
Y'know this post struck me as slanted, and I was accepting that others have different views, and there are republicans here, but you are a neocon. You put your foot in your mouth right here : "What is Obama going to do when Al-Queda strikes again? What is he going to do when Iran starts a nuclear arms race with Israel? What is going to do when he pulls out of Iraq and the government there collapses into civil war? Why wont the media networks ask him these questions? Why? Because they know he doesn't know how to answer them. " Put those exact questions to McCain. (I really wasn't going to go there but now I am) What is McCain going to do when Al Quaeda strikes again ? Simple, what the Bush administration did, bomb some random country that we don't like so well. What is McCain going to do when Iran starts a nuclear arms race with Israel ? Simple, bomb them first. Create the money by tax cuts and crippling our industry even further with restrictions on greenhous gas emissions. What is McCain going to do when he pulls out and the government there collapses into civil war ? Well you got me there, McCain is not pulling out. But there just about is a civil war going on anyway, so the solution would be another troop surge, and kill enough more of them so they can't wage war. Simple see ? Why won't the media ask McCain these questions ? BECAUSE HE DOES KNOW HOW TO ANSWER THEM, and like his buddies, whio can afford to be flippant and full of hubris because they were born with money, he might just make the stupid decision to answer them. And if he does, he will not be the President. You buy their bullshit, but I see it for what it is. And the problem is, I don't really disagree with you. Obama is probably very unfamiliar with foreign policy. That is not good. But with the choice that the powers that be bestowed upon us so graciously, I would rather have Obama. I am still a racist (but not a bigot) and I detest half of the things democrats generally stand for, social programs and the like. But this time around, the republican would be a very bad choice. And with his global warming bullshit, he totally lost me. If he'd get his nose out of his bosses asses and read something, and get into life he would see that the analysts are wrong this time, we are in a very deep recession. Oh, and all this about a treaty to reduce emissions ? Guess who is exempt ! China ! These people are flakes, democrats and republicans both. This lesser of two evils shit is getting old. Ron Paul is alright, but his stance on abortion is not timely, and not welcome even by me. I would ask the congressman how strongly he feels about it, and after the answer I would put this question to him. Are you willing to open up a supposed abortion clinic, but it's really a hospital specializing in prenatal care, and offer incentives to Women who come seeking abortions, talk them out of it, pay for all that care out of your pocket and then adopt those babies ? If the answer is no, you have no standing in my eyes. I don't care how much you would love, and try to enforce our Constitution, but if you won't blow your personal fortune on it, don't ask others to. That decision is based on religion, and has no business here. If you cannot accept that you have no business in that big chair. This is 2008, we are in deep shit of all kinds, I could not care less about global warming at this time. In the future yes, but there is nothing we can do right now. We have alot more pressing problems I think. Neither party has any valid solutions. T
|
|
|
|