HeavansKeeper
Posts: 1254
Joined: 5/14/2007 Status: offline
|
<QR> Most people here are saying "Experienced dom + Novice sub = Good." I agree. A lot of points have been made to consider: Experience in what? Experienced, but good with novices? How well do you get along outside of a scene? Less experienced doms are not evil. etc. MadRabbit brings up one good point, if you're doing any sort of edge play, experience really does matter a lot. Amateurs dabbled in it long ago so now our "new" can avoid those mistakes. I compare myself to my father... He's more experienced in this world, true. But he's also more jaded. He believes some things can't be done because they are not feasible or just "can't be done." Not all people age to think this way, but some do. This lowered fluidity is a common trend in aging*. What does it mean for a new submissive with an older experienced dom? He may be more set in his ways. His ways may also be wrong, and being set in wrong ways is bad. He may be closeminded to your needs. This is all such clouded waters. There are exceptions to every rule and everyone is an exception all the time. As others have said, this lifestyle isn't school (usually). A fourth year is not "better" than a second year. By that same logic, a twenty-fifth year is not automatically better than a fifth year, especially when it comes to matching you. Perhaps you want to learn with someone? My Pet did. It does seem a bit foolish, trying to say that you don't learn in 20 years what someone does in less than 5, and that's not what I'm saying. Dominant is a bad term for what it is that we do. I was answering to someone "what makes a dom tick?" today, and I told her that it's about teaching. A good dominant is more accurately a sensei or maestro, as compared to "one who dominates." Domination can be done in so many ways... and 20 years in the field can enlighten someone to some of the more brutal, calloused, interesting ones, no doubt. But its about more than that. How well someone makes you understand what is being taught is important. A control freak, who just wants things done his way, no questions asked, gets "better" at this with time. Someone who will use you for sex and money with no exchange of training or a good experience grows callous to these actions in time. Those are both bad ways of dominating (If you'd like to disagree, please see me for clarification before assuming those short sentences are an effort to encapsulate the entire concept of power exchange). A teacher, then... Instead of asking about experience, has he ever made you think "How did he know all that about me?" *As with all trends there are exceptions blar blar blar, that said, there's plenty of age related research that states as people age they tend to remain familiar with things they know and like. This familiarity breeds a masterful understanding of the topic, but a (possibly) subconscious closedmindedness in other areas. This is, of course, avoidable, although believers of the SOC (Selective Optimization and Compensation) theory would agree avoiding the selecting of key fluid skills tends to lead to a more overall decline in skills and abilities. Other applicable findings about aging: People do tend to lose fluid skills (speed of learning, speed at unpracticed arbitrary tasks) but crystalized knoweldge remains constant/grows with age (how the world works.) It's important not to confuse crystalized knowledge with wisdom. Wisdom is hard to define, but early testing shows using the definition "Able to give the most advice about an issue" Age was not a factor. Only 5% of people were considered "wise", with professionals in the field of the question being highly (and obviously) more able to give applicable solutions.
_____________________________
The Loving Owner of HisHeavan ... You've waited your whole life for this moment...
|