ownedgirlie -> RE: Fear? (7/10/2008 11:29:50 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Maxwell67 quote:
ORIGINAL: ownedgirlie I try not to apply "shoulds" to other people's relationships. I am all for keeping my uninvited nose out of anothers personal life. And as long as it is not bleeding over into the lives of non-consenting folk in a way that is disrespectful of their rights, I am happy to keep it that way. But if the power one person holds over another is abused in a way that makes them a danger to anyone outside that relationship, then I am going to do a lot more than apply a 'should' or 'should not' to it. The danger in controlling a person this completely is that it removes that persons ability to make their own judgements about what is demanded (or what they think is demanded, ore even expected of them). The news is full of horror stories about people who were 'just following orders'. Hi Maxwell, Of course, you bring up a point that "shoulds" can very appropriately be applied to others when it comes to harming those outside of their relationships. This is why I did not make my statement an absolute. I should have clarified (I can apply "shoulds" to myself all I want, heh). As for non-consenting folks and what is bled over to them, there's a great thread going on about what is offensive to others. I personally don't feel as passionately as others do in the whole "non-consenting public" concern, but I agree people shouldn't go around causing harm to others. As for how others "should" conduct themselves within the confines of their own healthy relationship, however, who am I to say, if they're happy?
|
|
|
|