Amaros
Posts: 1363
Joined: 7/25/2005 Status: offline
|
I've heard quite a few men mention they get turned on by how "submissive" it is: i.e., it sin't something "nice" girls do, and in a sense, the submission consists in a certain sense in the act of becoming a "slut" - to me however, it's more of a an intimacy issue - the same thing holds true insofar as burning your bridges as a chaste female, but I see it more as a form of trust. Of course, this will apply more to people with those lingering hangups, I've known women who thought no more of it than an interesting variation, but there are considerable psychodynamics involved for a lot of people - it's a huge bugaboo for the religious right for instance who are against any form of recreational sex and very political about it, are particularly sensitive to the whole good/evil thing, etc., and have this big feminine orgasm denial/breeder fetish, i.e., women really aren't supposed to enjoy sex, they're just there to serve the mans needs - which is fine, if that works for you, but female sexual response has also evolved for a reason, and how you approach anal sex should really be not much different than how you approach vaginal, or any other of the ways you express your sexuality and how you "feed your needs". I guess a lot of the pleasure for me is gettting somebody to finally let go of all that - damn the torpedos, ya' know? A limit like that is tantamount to a divided loyalty to me: it signifies that you value some third party opinion of you more than mine - you cannot serve two masters, etc. Unless, of course, you have medical issues, excessively squicky, etc. which I can respect in proportion to the problem. So it's roughly the same dynamic either way I think, but depending on the dom they will probobly see it as either and act of intimacy or and act of submission - not that those are mutually exclusive either.
|