RE: Reassuring subs (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


HarryVanWinkle -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 9:02:55 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TwoDommeDivas
I'm not sure why, though I speculate that it is because people (unjustifiably) fear women less than men.


I must respectfully disagree with the (unjustifiably).  The VAST majority of all serial killers are men.  The majority of all violent criminals are men.

I must admit to having met and played with more than a few tops without safe calls or other safety procedures.  I've even travelled to strange, exotic foriegn lands to do so.  Such as California and Tennessee.

I suppose one of the reasons I disregard first meeting safety procedures, while being a stickler for other safety procedures, is the fact of my size and maleness.  Kill me and you've got a BIG body disposal problem to deal with.  Another is that I have something of a fear fetish.  When I have some fear of a, umm, procedure, it acts as an incentive for me to try it.  This is why I first got peircings and cuttings.  This is why I first did a butterfly board scene, got a whipping with a singletail, etc. etc.




restlessdreamer -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 10:37:58 AM)

On the subject of people not wanting to set up a safe call because their friends are vanilla and might not understand - Do you think it's really necessary to explain the entire nature of the meet? I mean that, online 'dates' are more widely accepted than ever before, why not just omit some information by simply stating that you started talking to this person on the net and now you want to meet for coffee. I think almost everyone would understand and be willing to step up as a safe call with just that little bit of information.


I think LadyPact made a valuable suggestion as well, if you're not 'networked' physically - then why not have online acquaintances be a safecall too? People that understand this setting very well and will not chastise or criticise your decision making ability while still providing a safe backup.

I hope no one minds me butting in with my two cents. [:)]






softness -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 10:38:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: persephonee

quote:

ORIGINAL: softness

Generally speaking I don't do a safe call. This is because, until I know someone very well,  I play in public, and meet in public. Joe Public offers me far more protection than a safe call does. All a safe can do for me during a public meet, is create the knowledge that something has (past tense) happened to me ... not stop something bad from (present tense) happening. Now if I was bundled into a car in a safe public place (Starbucks for instance) .. even in polite old England someone would take down the number and call the police. No safe call can help with that. If someone stabs me to death in Borders, again, someone will make a note of it I should imagine and a safe call will be less than helpful.

Maybe the subs are thinking along the lines I am ... or maybe you just pick subs who dont think


That is exactly why i avoid Borders at all costs....i cant tell you the number of bloodied chalk lines ive had to step over to get to the self-help section.


*shakes head mournfully* ... bookshops *tuts* ..dens of sin indeed




WalterRego -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 11:21:12 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TwoDommeDivas

One thing I'd like to add, is that sometimes we do play publicly with someone on a first play date.  And we like to ramp up the intensity by staging a "kidnap" scene, if they are willing.  Surprisingly, a LOT of men are into this.  We will meet them somewhere and blindfold and restrain them, then drive them to the play date.  In that situation, we really go out of our way to advise them as to safe calls, etc., since that is such an inherently out-of-control situation.

Of course, we are entirely trustworthy and they are completely safe at all times, but we think the ritual of advising them lets them have a comfort level, while at the same time becomes part of our psychological "ramp up" in control.  Pre-play instructions can act as a kind of foreplay, even safety instructions.  It is all part and parcel of our psychological domination of a sub.


What an amazing hot mindfuck, once blindfolded, to tell him, "You followed our instructions soo well. Sorry, but now that you're tied up and blindfolded, we decided,  we're not taking you to the place we told you. Or going to do what we told you we were in the first place. You're ours now."




silkncarol -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 12:46:06 PM)

If i'm meeting someone for the first time, i tend to treat it like a vanilla date and use all the common sense you'd apply to the situation.  Like softness said, a safe call isn't really going to keep you safe....by the time you miss one...it really could be too late.  I do leave my info with a friend...where i'll be, with who, etc... i figure if worse comes to worse they'll at least have a place for the Police to start.  I do have friends who will ask me to drop them an email when i'm home..but mostly for their own peace of mind. 

I don't usually play with an unknown person...i'll have some idea from watching them play at a public dungeon or party or personally know someone who has played with them before.  Or if i've had that vanilla meeting, we've established some kind of relationship, then i'll go with my intuition and gut feeling.....but i'll still let someone know where i'll be and with whom. There have been times when i felt perfectly safe, but the Dominant insisted i set up a safe call..which always increases the level or comfort..and that's an excellent thing! 




gypsygrl -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 12:54:58 PM)

quote:

Bottoms, does that kind of thing reassure you and make you trust enough to let go?


Not really.  If I decide to meet/play with someone, I know I'm taking a risk.  The level of risk varies by situation, but its never absent.  Nothing can convince me otherwise.

The only thing that makes me trust enough to let go is consistently trustworthy behavior over a long period of time.  By long period of time, I mean months and months and months.   Every day I don't wake up dead is like an investment in the trust bank.  And for that trust to develop, I have to be with the person in person.  I have to give them the chance to hurt me and see what they do with that chance otherwise I can never trust them. 

Does that make sense?




CruelDesires -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 12:57:32 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: TwoDommeDivas

quote:

ORIGINAL: YourhandMyAss

If someone was a killer bent on killing the submissive their meeting, safe calls won't stop that. Nor does it mean you're automatically safe, things could be going well when I call to say they're fine, and then could take a turn for the worse the minute I was off the phone.

To imply that subs who do safe calls are at any less risk to be killed than subs who don't is a bit silly.




I disagree.  Knowing that a sub has measures in place to alert authorities is a good deterrant for doms who are considering wilfull harm.  You'd have to be a real fucking nutjob to know the police would have your photo, name, whereabouts, etc., and then to go ahead and kill the sub anyway.  Chances are, if you've taken precautions, a dom bent on murder or harm will pick someone else for their victim.


The are some really bad "fucking nutjobs" out there. I would classify most serial killers in that catagory too. [&:]

CD




malloves69 -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 1:05:43 PM)

lets see ..im a 50 year old sub male ..probable seen like 10 mistresses so far [:)] guess im pretty trusting about being with women [:)] and i have never feared for my life while playing with any mistress i have seen so far [:)] yes we discussed safe words ...yes i have used them but not too often ..if i feared going to see someone then  i probable wont go ....call it vibes ..good luck ...being stupid ..i just feel its my personal playtime that im paying for so what could go wrong ? [:)] sure there are sadistic women out there but i kinda stay away from those since im not really a pain slut per se ....women are more caring ..loving ..nurturing persons who i think wont harm you to a point of it being life threatening ..just my opinion of course ...have fun ..push limits ..but play safe and it should be fun [:)] mal




Nikolette -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 1:09:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

I don't understand why it's so scary to meet someone in a public place that one would need a safecall.  I suppose it's the fact that we hear in the news all the time about someone getting murdered or at the least the crap beat out of them while sitting across from their date in Starbucks.  (yes, sarcasm was intended)
If you feel the need of a safecall or a buddy for a public meet then maybe you should be questioning whether you should be meeting that person at all.
If you're meeting someone privately and they intend to harm you, they will and they're not gonna stop when you say "Hey, mind if I take five to make my safecall, and then you can continue to murder me?"  They would hurt you and be gone long before anyone would be pacing the floor waiting for that phone to ring.  Safecalls are useless except for finding your body. 


This type of logic I've seen on this thread really surprises me. It a pretty shortsighted way of viewing things.

While I don't hear about people getting murdered at Starbucks, its not unreasonable for someone to slip a "roofie" into your drink there. Or follow you home. Or seem normal and so you go with them somewhere more private.... etc etc. These things that one doesn't plan for or intend on.

When I set up safecalls: I call them when I've arrived with the stranger. And I call them at given points in the night/day to reassure them of my safety. And then when I get home and I'm secure. And/or to update them on any change of plans. At each point I have a code phrase previously agreed upon to indicate that I'm okay, not okay- but not unsafe, or the police need called ASAP. I provide them with useful and helpful information pertinant to the visit and with a specific plan of what to do in the worst case scenerio.

And if I'm being attacked, true: I can't stop and make a call....BUT.... The person I'm calling knows exactly what to do if I haven't made the next designated call. And those hours- literally could mean the difference between life and death in the search for me. It could also bring about the prosecution of the offender in the event its too late- and that is important to me for my own sake as well as others.

ALSO--- Something extremely important to add: If someone "intends" to hurt you, but they see you are implimenting self protective methods, they CAN change their mind based on not wanting to get caught. So it CAN be a deterrent. Preditors rarely have violent impulses that they can't control at all. Meaning- they aren't in a blind murderous lust and will make, sometimes, logical choices if the person is establishing strong boundaries and it seems like they will get caught/deterred.

In a nutshell: its free/extremely cheap, its easy, it can help you--- why the heck not?

I swear I want to sign you all up for self-defense classes so you all empower yourselves, rather than creating openings for victimization. I urge you all to be pro-active and aggressive in your safety methods.




TwoDommeDivas -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 1:41:42 PM)

Nikolette, I think that's a wonderful and very smart post.  [:)]

I doubt there have been any statistical studies, but does anyone have an idea of how many times a sub meeting for bdsm fun has been murdered by their dom?  I don't recall EVER hearing of such an event, though I know it must have happened.

Dana (Argh! I keep forgetting to sign my name so you know which one of us this is.  I'm the one in the avatar.)




Aileen1968 -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:10:58 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikolette

quote:

ORIGINAL: Aileen1968

I don't understand why it's so scary to meet someone in a public place that one would need a safecall.  I suppose it's the fact that we hear in the news all the time about someone getting murdered or at the least the crap beat out of them while sitting across from their date in Starbucks.  (yes, sarcasm was intended)
If you feel the need of a safecall or a buddy for a public meet then maybe you should be questioning whether you should be meeting that person at all.
If you're meeting someone privately and they intend to harm you, they will and they're not gonna stop when you say "Hey, mind if I take five to make my safecall, and then you can continue to murder me?"  They would hurt you and be gone long before anyone would be pacing the floor waiting for that phone to ring.  Safecalls are useless except for finding your body. 


This type of logic I've seen on this thread really surprises me. It a pretty shortsighted way of viewing things.

While I don't hear about people getting murdered at Starbucks, its not unreasonable for someone to slip a "roofie" into your drink there. Or follow you home. Or seem normal and so you go with them somewhere more private.... etc etc. These things that one doesn't plan for or intend on.

When I set up safecalls: I call them when I've arrived with the stranger. And I call them at given points in the night/day to reassure them of my safety. And then when I get home and I'm secure. And/or to update them on any change of plans. At each point I have a code phrase previously agreed upon to indicate that I'm okay, not okay- but not unsafe, or the police need called ASAP. I provide them with useful and helpful information pertinant to the visit and with a specific plan of what to do in the worst case scenerio.

And if I'm being attacked, true: I can't stop and make a call....BUT.... The person I'm calling knows exactly what to do if I haven't made the next designated call. And those hours- literally could mean the difference between life and death in the search for me. It could also bring about the prosecution of the offender in the event its too late- and that is important to me for my own sake as well as others.

ALSO--- Something extremely important to add: If someone "intends" to hurt you, but they see you are implimenting self protective methods, they CAN change their mind based on not wanting to get caught. So it CAN be a deterrent. Preditors rarely have violent impulses that they can't control at all. Meaning- they aren't in a blind murderous lust and will make, sometimes, logical choices if the person is establishing strong boundaries and it seems like they will get caught/deterred.

In a nutshell: its free/extremely cheap, its easy, it can help you--- why the heck not?

I swear I want to sign you all up for self-defense classes so you all empower yourselves, rather than creating openings for victimization. I urge you all to be pro-active and aggressive in your safety methods.


Ok...so let's assume the crazed abusive person knows enough to act normally until he gets you alone for that first play session.  Of course he's agreed to all of your requirements because they really don't mean anything to him.  You have safe calls lined up.  Even a safeword.  He gets you in a room.  You make your safe call and then he beats the living shit out of you.  You now get to lay there for some time, assuming that you don't have an arrangement to make a safe call every ten minutes.  He boogies out of there and has a nice head start , even if it is only ten minutes.  Safe calls will never prevent this.  If someone is really that friggin looney that they're gonna harm you, then they will once they get you alone.  Once again...safe calls will not prevent this.  Luck and good judgement in picking the guy you choose to be alone with will.

edited to add...the op didn't advocate self defense classes.  She advocated safe calls and info exchange which is what I responded to.  Obviously, knowing self defense helps one's chances of escaping.  Oh and...I've taken classes. 




DesFIP -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:18:32 PM)

Isn't something I did. But I didn't meet him until after we had become friends so it wasn't as though he was a total stranger. I suppose if I met someone a couple of days after a first email and then played quickly before becoming friends it would be useful. But honestly, if I wanted to play with a stranger it would be in public, not private so I still wouldn't need this.




TwoDommeDivas -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:19:57 PM)

Aileen, you don't think that safe calls and procedures prevent any harm?  You believe that they are useless?




Aileen1968 -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:20:50 PM)

I think they give a false sense of security, but this is my choice.  People should do what they're comfortable with.  I think that stuff can definitely help afterwards, but doesn't prevent anything. 

edited to add info.




Aileen1968 -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:24:28 PM)

I'd actually be very open to hear a scenario where a safe call could prevent someone from going nuts and hurting you.  I'd love to have my mind changed.




mbes -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:54:37 PM)

quote:

Bottoms, does that kind of thing reassure you and make you trust enough to let go?


I'm a contrarian, and so someone insisting that I set up safecalls would raise my hackles, make me feel less safe, and I wouldn't meet them at all. I would also consider them to be taking responsibility for something that wasn't yet theirs. Frankly, I'd find it creepy.
That said, someone always knows where I am, and with whom.




Nikolette -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 3:56:08 PM)

quote:

from going nuts


They're not going nuts. They want you to think they are nuts. They are not. They are rational for the most part. Prison isn't as good of a place to harm people, you see. Not understanding this is one's worst error, in my not so humble opinion on this matter.

Preditory people LOOK for those who aren't taking protective measures. To put it extremely simply: They look for green flags, just like "normal" people look for red flags. Enough green=choice to harm another.

Also, it really doesn't hurt, so why not err on the side of caution. Its not a false sense of security, as my own post indicates, I am planning for the worst, to avoid the worst.

But hey, I could type all day about this and it won't matter a bit. A defensive "change my mind, I dare you to try" attitude isn't really going to be an open door to understanding the self protective mentality.




KneelingSilently -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 4:04:41 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikolette


Preditory people LOOK for those who aren't taking protective measures. To put it extremely simply: They look for green flags, just like "normal" people look for red flags. Enough green=choice to harm another.



Well said. You cannot make anything 100% safe. Putting an alarm on your car won't keep someone from stealing it if they really want it. But it will make most criminals try elsewhere. The safecall is a deterrent. It actually will stop some predators from harming you if they know someone else has enough information about them that they might get caught.




YourhandMyAss -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 4:34:35 PM)

That's why you never take your eye off your drink, if you go pee, order a new one once you get back, if you get up to order a muffin take your drink with you. And if you're worried about being followed home, don't go strait home, go to the mall and hang out or go to a local police station, ect ect.

That will deal w/ith your two what if senarios right there.
quote:

ORIGINAL: Nikolette

While I don't hear about people getting murdered at Starbucks, its not unreasonable for someone to slip a "roofie" into your drink there. Or follow you home. Or seem normal and so you go with them somewhere more private.... etc etc. These things that one doesn't plan for or intend on.





MadRabbit -> RE: Reassuring subs (7/15/2008 4:48:39 PM)

I would imagine that, putting aside the self engineered paranoid fears of the BDSM community in general, people who kill other people without any motivation besides a thrill ride are a very small percentage of murderers. I imagine that people commit violent crimes commit them because they gain something from doing so. In the case of two anonymous people meeting together for the first time, the most realistic threat would be the rape of a woman by a man, because the anonymous woman is providing something that men often aggressively want.

I tend to squash this fear by providing as much information about my identity as I can prior to the meeting (as well as getting the same in return). I do everything I can to present myself as an open book and have the initial meeting in public. It doesn't take much to figure out what kind of guy I am.

Outside of that, nope not really. I won't meet someone offline if I didn't have a 100% good feeling about them.

Edited to Add : I find safecalls in general to be just a procedure people go through to create a false sense of security. Unless someone is making a safe call every ten minutes, it's easy to manipulate and time the night to pull off a rape and get away before the supposed safe call began to suspect something. Add in breaking the persons phone and the factor that most people aren't going to call the cops if someone is ten minutes late on a safe call and you have even more time.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3] 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875