RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion



Message


Aileen1968 -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 8:01:48 PM)

Wait...I'm supposed to worry about what online people think of me???
I never knew that.




SurrenderForMe -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 8:23:45 PM)

You may want to edit your story.  Soho is in New York, not CA. 

I have never trashed someone for rejecting me.  I have ranted about being hurt once or twice, once online, with the cruel cruel persons identifying characteristics removed. 

On the other hand, I have walked into stories, like the one you just posted and made the mistake of asking to know more details because I believe that if someone is a major jerk or worse, the advantage of the internet and sites of kinky people is to let others know so they can avoid them.  I have had endless lectures about how people should not pass on stories that may damage the innocent.  My response is, that I take the information and use it for a reference.  I have met people I was warned about and interacted with them.  I kept the supposed offense at the back of my mind to remind me of what I would and would not do or where I would or would not go. 

I heard about a guy, sub, supposed to be a rapist.  Actually, I have heard this about several guys, but I am going to tell only one story.   I will note that in my experience two guys who proved out to be abusers, but were doms, never had any major issue with people rejecting them.  The subs usually got decimated by rumors.

He wasn't popular, he was attractive but no huge fan base.  He was with someone I knew and was not really close to.  The side story to that is a tragicomedy all on its own.  Anyway, he and his then partner were hanging out and talking to me and my partner.  She wandered off, he stayed we chatted.  He mentioned that he was being ostracized.  Openly admitted he had a story and wanted to tell it in private.  So, what am I to do.  He is supposed to be a rapist, he wants to talk privately. 

We weren't going for a car ride, that's for sure. lol

That was easily handled.  I told my sub I was going to talk to him.  I told him to watch us, we were going out of sound range but staying in plain sight on a busyish commercial street, with a large group of people in sight.

He was bi-polar.  He had not taken his meds.  He had a crush on a girl and had raped her.  The details are depressing and he described it clearly enough that it was clearly rape.  He was convicted.  He went to jail.  He was on probation and his meds.  He was wishy washy on taking responsibility.  He wanted me to tell him that it was ok, that he had the excuse of being bi-polar.  What I told him was that he had hurt someone and that he was responsible for making amends and that he was undermining any sympathy from me by justifying something terrible. 

He asked if he could continue talking to me in the future and I said yes.  We met off and on for a few years.

He followed my advice and addressed what he had done, when he met someone new.  He had a lot of rejections, but he managed to hook up with two dommes that I know of.  He was barred from all of the play groups though.  One of the dommes he hooked up with, he introduced me to and we acknowledged the fact that he had provided full disclosure of the past event. 

He didn't get a free ride, but there were people willing to be with him with conditions set to accomodate his history.   I thought that was about the best he could hope for.  He had people who hung out with him and partners, but was treated by the majority  (people who had no connection to him and therefore no reason to go out of their way for him) as a criminal. 

He is the exception to the group of men that I have heard something negative about.  He alone tried to address his mistakes.  The rest, all kept on doing what they did.  Had varying levels of popularity, and their staunch defenders saying that what was said was a lie.   That is the hard part of being in a herd.  You are not supposed to use your own judgement.

I keep a low profile now so I am not around anyone that would potentially mention any names that would raise a red flag.  I live by innocent until proven guilty, but if warned will add layers of protection until I satisfy myself that I understand all the risks. 

The gossip in both online and real time groups is virulent and contagious.  The pettiness of people, at times seems overwhelming.  All I can do is use common sense, as I suggest others do.   I am sick of the conversations that start "They warned me but", if someone hears something bad, keep it in mind, keep your safety ahead of your libido or compassion,  until you have enough knowledge to decide on your own that someone is ok or not.

This did not address someone who really is the victim of malicious gossip.   I haven't encountered that yet.  Each time some rumor came that I was curious enough to check out, there was a kernel of truth.  Usually a whole corn field.  The ones I did not check out are still just that to me, rumors.  I don't  know  the person  described  in the post, I have no opinion on the story, except that  SoHo is in New York.  If the person is innocent, I wish them all the best. 

I know that I have created rumors in the past.  Really, I did beat someone until he passed out.  Why, he passed out unexpectedly.  Was that fun, not really.  It is hard to get someone down when he's a foot taller than me.  That was why I was happy we were in public.  All the big strong men and women who help.  No lasting damage, except to my ego.  I don't like to make mistakes.  If he was going to pass out, I wanted it to be because I planned it.

Then there was the time I was demoing fire play.....




Kalista07 -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 8:31:23 PM)

Steel, i'm not sure if i would say i've 'cock blocked' anyone or not. Although, i'm sure if i was on the other side of this coin i'd say i had. The reality is though that after i had been beaten, raped, and assaulted by someone i met from CM i did tell women from his area his real name as well as my experience with him.  i've stopped doing that since then.....but hey....

Kali





CruelDesires -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 8:38:56 PM)

When people ask me about someone in the community , I tell them,

This is what I know.
This is what I've heard.
Don't just take my word on it.
Ask this person or these people.

CD




myotherself -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 10:07:15 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Exquemelin

A female Dom who I believe was half of a dom/dom couple had contacted my sub .......and basically said "Oh Yeah I've heard stories about him, Be careful with him" which was fun coming from a woman I'd never met..........
Ex



I've had almost exactly the same thing just this week!  A local Domme cmailed me and flirted with me shamelessly (even though I stated I was 100% straight), but when I said I'd agreed to serve my new Master she told me he was 'a nice guy, but unreliable'.  As she and my Master have never met, and he's new to the local scene too, that came as quite a big surprise to me!  
I'm an honest person, so I ignored further mail from her and I told Master what she had said, and also told him I thought it was a crock. 
Trust is everything, and if some online cyberloser can break that trust so easily, then maybe that is telling in itself...




defiantbadgirl -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 10:22:45 PM)

I can think of 2 reasons I would warn others about someone in the lifestyle.

1. I saw them on the sex offender list.

2. They did anything non-consentual or obtained consent by fraud (lying about intentions).




MasterKalif -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 10:34:49 PM)

To the OP...I normally take anything online with a grain of salt...people say things for whatever reason. Jealousy, rage, anger, etc. In this case what sucks is that you kind of liked that girl. I think people who live in gossip live with half the truth. If she was worth being your sub she could have always talked to you, but chose to close contact cause she "had heard enough"...that means there was no real connection if a few lies was all it took.

In any case...I am a person who is generally easy going and like to unify not separate people...and it was in an online capacity on a genealogy project I keep that my cousin chose as a forum to badmouth me and my family...needless to say the moderator a close friend (and distant relative) took off her offensive message as it was not the place for that kind of thing...I mean I don't understand if people have a problem, they should be direct not try to lie or tell other people half truths, as that is just an attempt to cause "collateral damage"....so as someone said this happens all the time, anywhere, in any group.




SirDragon1961 -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 11:40:15 PM)

He dips His lid:

SurrenderforMe; Then there was the time I was demoing fire play.....   I'm still chuckling and thinking p'raps a new thread????

It is inevitable that one or both peoples expectations or plans will go awry and needs will not be met or diasasterously addressed.  The 'trust' and 'connection' between the players comes into consideration then and it is underpinned by integrity and respect.  Do  people take responsibility for their own actions (or lack of ) or pass the buck of blame onto another?   I believe we always have some form of complicity in any fuck-up.  This includes rape.  We ask our youngsters to 'protect themselves' with various strategies.  What makes us any different particularly when we are playing in far more dangerous waters?

This does not mean that I have no compassion nor empathy with so called 'victims'.  I spent nearly 2 years in fear of another resulting from a sexual abuse that destroyed the trust that had existed between her n I.  I have learnt well of my complicity in this incident, and categorically can state her behaviour was criminally prosecutable where I was a victim.

People in Lifestyle that believe another is trustworthy because of one play are fools..  I liken my body (I'm Dom) to my house, dog, or my car.  I wouldn't let anyone have control of them unless I am completely satisfied that I am willing to accept my bad judgement if anything untoward occurs as a result of my letting them have  control of them.   Some  may question my use of 'control' but every time I play with a sub I allow her to have control of my reputation.  Is she a nut job that will later make rumours? Will she castrate me publicly if I make a mistake and blow the mistake out of all proportion?


There are bad/criminal subs just as there are Doms. There are also under-cautious subs/Dom/mes who through personal negligence allow gross errors to occur.  There are the 'accidents' that also cause physical injury- this is where 'contracts of play' co-signed prior to play minimise the risk to injury or reputation. These contracts should be requested by both parties in any 'casual play' including public play. 

People have often queried why I do not have 'casual play' and it is partly for the above reasons.  I know who I am and where I sit comfortably for others to perceive me.  Swinging for Sex is an area where damage/fuck-ups/criminality are minimised but swinging BDSM play or what most nefariously term 'Poly Dom/sub or Poly Play' is simply swinging or 'Slut Dom/sub or Slut Play'.  For this one must bear the negative consequences of their involvement. These people are 'sluts, gutter snipes etc, not poly! So keep yourself on 'danger flag ' alert.  Accept your own complicity in actions that you may complain about.

Having got on my soap box (again) I do support 'outing' people however there are so many 'emotionally damaged' people in Lifestyle that one has to question how valid their arguments are for 'outing' so called bad/criminal behaviour.  It is easily slander.  

Warm regards to all.  Sir Dragon, Sir to His whip_pet.

(If my post strikes a raw nerve with you- I suggest you have a cuppah-get fresh air and re-read before responding.  I  look forward to criticism and use it as my major influence of learning)




SirDragon1961 -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/16/2008 11:59:57 PM)

He dips His lid to Defiant Girl

I can think of 2 reasons I would warn others about someone in the lifestyle.

1. I saw them on the sex offender list.

The 'sex offender' list you refer to in the States I believe is fraught with offences that many would not consider 'danger flags'.  I'm not sure if a person named on them can prove what their 'sex offence' is- (Someone could enlighten me) so it is probably at best an 'Amber Flag' list.  I believe it alienates communities and creates more harm to communities than good.  (This is the principal reason we do not have one here in Australia.)

2. They did anything non-consentual or obtained consent by fraud (lying about intentions).
 
Are you saying Defiant that the list declares the offence? That your second point is directly linked to point One? 

If not... I pose the following.  I lend my car to another with expressed parameters that it will be returned in same condition as lent. (One body given in trust to another)  The person takes the car to a destination other than expressed as intention to me (lying or circumstances changed) or they crash the car or another person crashes into or intentionally damges the car.  Do I have the right to 'out' the person and influence their reputation to others?   Do others have the right to pass on this information and add to it in the process (as hoomans do!) and further damage the person's reputation beyond my original complaint?   Do I make an honourable complaint of the person admitting my complicity or place ALL BLAME on the other?  If your No 2 point Defiant is not connected to the sex offenders' list then I believe you should re-evaluate your complicity in being a slanderous hooman.

Warm regards to all.  Sir Dragon.  Sir to His whip_pet  





Kalista07 -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 12:33:54 AM)

quote:

I lend my car to another with expressed parameters that it will be returned in same condition as lent. (One body given in trust to another) The person takes the car to a destination other than expressed as intention to me (lying or circumstances changed) or they crash the car or another person crashes into or intentionally damges the car. Do I have the right to 'out' the person and influence their reputation to others? Do others have the right to pass on this information and add to it in the process (as hoomans do!) and further damage the person's reputation beyond my original complaint? Do I make an honourable complaint of the person admitting my complicity or place ALL BLAME on the other? If your No 2 point Defiant is not connected to the sex offenders' list then I believe you should re-evaluate your complicity in being a slanderous hooman.


i'm sure You did not intend to come off as patronizing or condescending as You appeared to come off to me.  At what point do You believe a person has personal responsibility to inform the community (or even specific community members) about the actions of another?  Intellectually i think i can understand where You are coming from, however the reality of it is...practicality is another matter entirely.  Here's an exampe: i was assaulted (raped, beaten, blah blah blah) by someone i met through this website.  i made a police reported and begged them to go forward with pressing charges.  However, because i had met him through here they felt it too 'risky'.  Despite the fact that i have documented evidence that these types of things routinely occur with him (his criminal record which is available online), and despite the fact that her normally does not give people he meets his real name, do You still not think i have some type of personal responsibility here? 
As a side note, perhaps You and Defiant have a relationship with each other off the boards. So, perhaps Your characterization of her as a slanderous hooman will not be as offensive to her as it appears to be to me.
i'm really not trying to get into a pissing match here, i just think it's important to consider every side of the situation.
Kali





SirDragon1961 -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 3:12:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Kalista07

quote:

I lend my car to another with expressed parameters that it will be returned in same condition as lent. (One body given in trust to another) The person takes the car to a destination other than expressed as intention to me (lying or circumstances changed) or they crash the car or another person crashes into or intentionally damges the car. Do I have the right to 'out' the person and influence their reputation to others? Do others have the right to pass on this information and add to it in the process (as hoomans do!) and further damage the person's reputation beyond my original complaint? Do I make an honourable complaint of the person admitting my complicity or place ALL BLAME on the other? If your No 2 point Defiant is not connected to the sex offenders' list then I believe you should re-evaluate your complicity in being a slanderous hooman.


i'm sure You did not intend to come off as patronizing or condescending as You appeared to come off to me. Yes, that is not my intention but many do interpret my writing that way without knowing me. So no offence intended and respect given for your interpetation/comment Kalista.

 At what point do You believe a person has personal responsibility to inform the community (or even specific community members) about the actions of another?  Intellectually i think i can understand where You are coming from, however the reality of it is...practicality is another matter entirely. This is where you appear to justify a departure from integrity, truthfulness etc,  I assume you mean that "practicality" means 'emotions coming into the situation'.  It is the emotional response that perhaps is the underlying issue/question to this thread and most threads on C/m.  Emotions and money are the principal reasons for many of our hooman mistakes- wars, personal relationships etc.  Our ability to rationalise are affected by emotional response (imagine if everyone was in sub space- ok serious again) 
 
Here's an exampe: i was assaulted (raped, beaten, blah blah blah) by someone i met through this website.  i made a police reported and begged them to go forward with pressing charges.  However, because i had met him through here they felt it too 'risky'. Ok, have you both signed a contract of play?  Have you organised to 'phone a friend' at differing times during the play?  Have you protected yourself as much as you would advise a teenager to do?  Numerous threads here has discussed strategies for sub protection.
 The inducement of sub-space and pre-sub-space is possibly worse than date/rape drugs? (I'd Love some qualifiable comment here)  Simply for the police to proceed they must have some evidence that can be presented in court to put in doubt any defence the rapist proffers. Despite the fact that i have documented evidence that these types of things routinely occur with him (his criminal record which is available online) This cannot be used in a court of law except at actual passing of sentence- it has no bearing upon determining guilt, and despite the fact that her normally does not give people he meets his real name, do You still not think i have some type of personal responsibility here? Yes, I do most certainly. You have a responsibility to protect yourself firstly, to acknowledge your personal value, and to juxtapose how an 'independent person' may interpret your actions to enable credibility for your honesty, integrity should it be called to question; firstly as a victim/first report and most importantly as the court victim/complainant/primary witness. 
 
 I as a Dominant must consider what would occur if a person died as a result of my play. What protection have I offered myself from public exposure in the Coroners' Court or to negate imprisonment for manslaughter? (I think unintentional homicide in States?) 
As a side note, perhaps You and Defiant have a relationship with each other off the boards. No we don't have any personal association and if she is offended by my comments then so be it.  If I am wrong I will unreservedly apologise.   I am also hooman and not infallable. So, perhaps Your characterization of her as a slanderous hooman will not be as offensive to her as it appears to be to me.

 
 

i'm really not trying to get into a pissing match here, i just think it's important to consider every side of the situation.
I thoroughly agree with you and thank you for challenging me to consider your points.  I look forward to a reply and will not view it as a pissing match but as a learning exchange of ideas.  (It's a bit hard to sit around a dinner table on the internet- but I'll provide the seafoood first n second course and the dessert)

Kali






I critcised Defiant in association with my immediate previous post comments. 

My personal opinion on what makes someone 'worthy' for play is not how they appear physically but how they appear mentally.   It is the mind n the body I play with. So I do ask for references from people that are known in 'real time Lifestyle' 

We are a small and helpful community when it comes to checking on others.  I travelled over 2,000 miles to meet my current Precious.  She had references provided by people in my local scene and was able to 'chat' with them if she so desired. I was also able to do this.  I did not have a play contract and did not expect to have the short paly that I did with her- I simply went to meet her and make personal judgements.  She is now in 'training' and has a full 'Training Contract' .  Does this contract protect me from prosecution of rape? No it might not , but it does clearly establish our Rick Aware Consentual Kink (RACK).forget the Safe Sane Consentual crap that is open to the outsider's (community) perception of what is SCC. The contract provides clear parameters that either one of us can use to evaluate RATIONALLY our relationship's pitfalls and developments.  Of course there is emotional response that can cloud the rational evaluation but it allows us as individuals to protect ourselves from ourselves.

Sorry for the rant but I amtrying to establish some further credibility here.




LaTigresse -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 6:35:48 AM)

Calling someone hooman isn't quite the way to go.......




CalifChick -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 7:05:17 AM)

The US sex offender list does indicate the category of crime (in every state that I've looked at the list, there may be some states that don't).  For instance, it will say "sex with minor under 14" or "aggravated rape", etc.

Cali




puppen -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 7:23:02 AM)

Oh Moon, yes, a thousand times, YES.

I'm going to snip this story a bit, but...
I met this fellow, who had APPEARED not insane or disgusting online. So, we took it a step further, and decided to meet for coffee.
I'm an idiot; I got into his car.

He then drove me to a church parking lot, groped and ...Eugh. When I told him we weren't a match, he went home and emailed everyone on my friendlist that I was underage, and that I would report everyone for rape if they came near me.

Another fellow, LAST NIGHT, was caught with photos of me. Long, aggrivating story short, an ex-dominant took my photos, and was pretending to be me to score women who wanted threesomes with me?




Amaros -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 11:29:12 AM)

It's always a two edged sword: sometimes it's an honest attempt to save somebody some greif but even here you need to remember that the gossiper is always the one with the motive here: good bad or indifferent, and besides concern there is: revenge, sour grapes, etc., etc., and of course there are always those who simply entertain themselves by spreading rumors - file it away, but don't believe everything you hear.




SteelofUtah -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 11:44:09 AM)

I am happy with how well this has turned out.

Just a few other sides to other peoples other sides.

Firstly for those who keep mentioning about wheather you are supposed to care about what people think about you online. No, you aren't but this really isn't about that, this is about what that can cause. This mostly has to deal with the Subbie Network which is far more active in Real Life communities than it is online I admit but it exists none the less.

I was with a sub for a very short period, we has a one night stand after flirting for quite some time and when I didn't call her after wards she started telling people I got her drunk and raped her. Now sure I had my reasons for not calling but regardless of that I know it wasn't the Propper thing to do, but all the sudden I started to recieve e-mails some asking for my side but quite a few that were simply nasty and two asking me to no longer attend thier functions because of this acusation. Most of this happened because I was New and Young and as well all know I am now and always have been a pervert. It was easy for people to pass judgement, even 7 years later there are people in the Las Vegas scene who still believe that I raped a girl after getting her drunk it is a Stigma that I have not shaken. I didn't rape anyone and find it impossible to be overly agressive with a woman who does not want me to, however that doesn't matter what does is that people who did not know anything about me belived me as such, and when someone wants to get to know things about me and asks around somehow I am a Rapist.

I know there are millons of stories about Abusers that start just this way.

I am wondering how you feel about the process and I know from what has been said already that there are many people here who would continue a Rumor and help to further slander someone because repeating what you have heard without going to the source does the same damage you have helped to spread the slander meaning that it will hit more people than it would have had you simply gone and asked hey I heard that you did __________, do you wanna talk about this because someone asked about you and I don't wanna spread something that has no hold in reality.

For those who believe that it is okay to repeat what you have heard to others do you ever wonder if the person listening will take it as hearsay or base thier decisions off of your words?

In case you all are wondering my answer is always to go to the source the people involved. Do I take sides? Sure but I learn about the side before I take it. I don't always get both sides but no one ever said I was perfect.

Steel




MadRabbit -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 12:08:44 PM)

I had a very insecure and neurotic girl once involve another online Dominant in some bullshit and he deemed himself her "online protector", sent me a few hate messages, talking really "big" and apparently attempting to intimidate me into leaving her alone.

It worked. Such childish and ridiculous high school level behavior on both their parts made me not want to talk to either of them ever again. She wasn't a bad person though and it was a bit of disappointment to have to chalk her up as 1 of the 2 people who left me on negative terms.

Outside of that...nope. I chalk that up to good judgment and intuition about people.




CruelDesires -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 4:14:07 PM)

Stay away from the whacko cracko's. Always works for me. :-)

CD




oneverygoodgirl -> RE: ~~The Online Equivalent of a Cock Block~~ (7/17/2008 4:21:01 PM)

I'm honest if asked, and am asked often.. but believe straight out slander and lies tends to backfire. The drama-to-intrique ratio alone is enough to make me run for the hills.  




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875