aggressiveblkdom -> RE: Subs/slaves submission a gift? (7/31/2008 8:12:28 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MasterAramis I think that the reason people call it a "gift" is because submission, by definition, has to be given. If it is taken, forced, coerced, then it is not submission. For example, were I captured by a ruthless dictator and in fear for my life, I'll bet I would obey him, would I respect him in my heart? No, I would fear and hate him. He would not have my loyalty, devotion, or submission; he would have surface obedience only until I could get away. But, someone who earns my respect and devotion I submit to because I am drawn to follow Him. So, in short, I think submission is given, and in that sense it is a gift. But I also believe Dominance is a gift, for I could not give submission unless someone gives me dominance in return, for they are intertwined as two sides of the same coin. How can I submit without something, someone to submit to? Just the first ramblings of a slave this morning.. ;) cheers, anna, slave of Master Aramis Duval I am going to have to agree with this viewpoint. I have seen some say that submission is in the person's nature. While this may be true, if submission was not something to be given wouldnt the sub simply submit to anyone of a dominant nature whom they come across, whether it is someone they respect, or feel is worthy of that submission?
|
|
|
|