slvemike4u
Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008 From: United States Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Thadius Evening Mike, I suppose the blockade using actual ships was just aggressive diplomatic negotiations? I do agree though that diplomacy should at least be attempted, if for no other reason to make clear what the stick is, and that there is a possible carrot. But more to the topic at hand, stating that diplomatic negotiations will be entered into with a hostile nation (party) with no conditions, seems a bit naive to me. Afterall, many times the meeting itself is a reward, as it allows for headlines and grandstanding about how they refused to give into the American oppressors. You know what I mean? As always, Thadius Damm right it was diplomacy and it remains diplomacy till those ships fire those weapons.As for talking with hostile nations,what you say is a point well taken,but you don't seem to take into acount this is a knife that cuts both ways...Having talked ,any subsequent action on our part can be justified in the court of world opinion much easier...and Thad you know full well how unilateral action is costing us in the court of public opinion...we seem to have come full circle to a little thing called... diplomacy
< Message edited by slvemike4u -- 8/2/2008 10:14:48 PM >
_____________________________
If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard" Forget Guns-----Ban the pools Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4
|