Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: How Many Agree?


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: How Many Agree? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/3/2008 10:14:29 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
I don't like Democrats or Republicans so I don't really have a dog in this fight.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/3/2008 10:24:23 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

Yeah, 71 year old men have nothing to offer society.  I don't know why we don't put them on a piece of ice and push them out to sea like the Eskimos used to do. 
Slaveboy,you have taken me to task in the past for snarky comments,and now you post this.The thread is discussing fitness to be President are you suggesting that McCains age is not subject for discussion,lets not for get he would be 76 or so at the tail end of his term...and no I would not suggest putting him on a piece of ice...

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/3/2008 11:05:21 PM   
FirmhandKY


Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

Yeah, 71 year old men have nothing to offer society.  I don't know why we don't put them on a piece of ice and push them out to sea like the Eskimos used to do. 
Slaveboy,you have taken me to task in the past for snarky comments,and now you post this.The thread is discussing fitness to be President are you suggesting that McCains age is not subject for discussion,lets not for get he would be 76 or so at the tail end of his term...and no I would not suggest putting him on a piece of ice...


I like what Reagan said " ... and I want you to know that also I will not make age an issue of this campaign. I am not going to exploit for political purposes my opponent's youth and inexperience."

The better youtube version: Reagan on Youth and Inexperience.

Firm

< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 8/3/2008 11:07:56 PM >


_____________________________

Some people are just idiots.

(in reply to slvemike4u)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/4/2008 5:24:12 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
Was that the same Reagan who had Alzheimers the last few years of his presidency? The guy that several of his cabinent have described as "not really there" during major talks about arms reduction teaties?

Just checking...

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/4/2008 9:02:06 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Hillary tore apart the Democratic party? REALLY? That's funny... did you ever notice that all the time those two were running neck and neck... bitching and throwing poo at each other like a pair of monkeys at the zoo's primate house... McCain was getting ZERO press? For months this went on! All eyes, all cameras... pointed at the Dems. McCain was a non-entity during those times....

Of course now, the thing that is entertaining me, as I said before, is the stagecraft of the Obama team, compared to the sheer ineptitude of McCain's people. Obama speaks in front of 200,000 europeans... McCain gives a swell testimonial for "Der Waffle and Sausage Haus."  Obama looks presidential talking to various world leaders, while McCain shuffles around a grocery store, where cans fall over like he's in a 50's sitcom with Lucille Ball. Obama accepts his nomination to a rock star crowd, McCain responds in front of a crowd of... dozens... in front of a green screen which results in people using his image in video political cartoons...

I find this whole thing funny as all hell... it's like watching David Bowie campaign against  Tim Conway as his "worlds oldest man" character from the old Carol Burnett show.


Overall, I like Hillary Clinton. She has been (and continues to be) a great Senator. I’ll vote for her again. But I can’t support her for President.

I believe she’s well-meaning. I believe she has good ideas. I believe she’s talented. And I even remember way back to when Hilary Rodham was one of the lawyers in the Watergate case. But she’s not a President.

And I believe Obama has saved her ass.

Granted, politics has been (and continues to be) an ugly business. Silly attacks trump reason and substance, not just now but historically. But the thirst for power at all costs can damage those victors.

Take George Bush. He and his party went to great lengths to win the 2000 election on a technicality. Later, investigating journalists agree that he would have narrowly won Florida anyway (though he’d still have lost the popular vote nationally, but that’s allowed in the current rules). Had he taken the high road, he’d have become President with far less bitterness. [Yes, he and his administration have amply demonstrated since then that they are entirely about power and using it for their own agenda, public be damned, but at least he’d have been off to a better start.]

Hilary’s thirst for the White House has led her to throw ethics out the window as well. Stretching the truth at first, for example, regarding her “experience” over Obama—they are both junior Senators, period. Does anyone think Laura Bush’s time in the White House counts as Presidential experience? Then outright lies—like landing in Somalia under sniper fire. But what bothers me most is her drive to win the nomination at all costs. If that means overturning the will of the voters via superdelegates, fine, presenting the clearly flawed argument that the states she narrowly won over Obama will go for McCain in November.

Particularly distasteful is her insistence that she “won” in Michigan and Florida, where Obama followed the rules and stayed away, while she forged ahead and claims this one horse race as a “victory.”

If she somehow managed to win this thing, she’d come in flawed from the start, as another candidate who won only on technicalities.

We’ve seen enough of that shit. I applaud Obama’s consistent insistence on keeping to issues and a better vision, even though he clearly knows what his opponents will throw at him. He’s saved Hilary from an unnecessary disaster of her own design.

And I sincerely hope he’s the next President of the United States. I believe he can help pull us from the economic and military messes Bush will leave behind, and I believe he can help lead us to new heights.

I would like to be proud of my country again.

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/4/2008 9:53:21 AM   
TreasureKY


Posts: 3032
Joined: 4/10/2007
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: bipolarber

Was that the same Reagan who had Alzheimers the last few years of his presidency? The guy that several of his cabinent have described as "not really there" during major talks about arms reduction teaties?

Just checking...


President Reagan was 77 years old when he left office in 1989.  It was five years later, in 1994, when he disclosed that he had been diagnosed with Alzheimer’s.  It was a further ten years after that before he passed away from pneumonia.

Considering the clinical stages of Alheimer's and that studies indicate that a typical 70 year old American man newly diagnosed with Alzheimer’s has a life expectancy of 4.4 years, it's doubtful that President Reagan was suffering severe "not really there" symptoms of Alzheimer’s while in office fifteen years prior to his death.

Edited to add:

quote:

Did Reagan have Alzheimer's disease in office?

Yes and no. Without a doubt, he was on his way to getting the disease, which develops over many years. But it is equally clear that there was not yet nearly enough decline in function to support even a tentative diagnosis. Reagan's mind was well within the realm of normal functioning. Even if his doctors had been looking intently for Alzheimer's, it is still likely that they would not have been able to detect the disease-in-progress.

quote:

How do you feel Mr. Reagan's Alzheimer's impacted his ability to perform his duty towards the end of his presidency?

"There is no evidence that Reagan had Alzheimer's Disease during his presidency. When he made his public announcement about the diseases in 1994, many of his critics exchanged meaningful glances, as if to say, "We knew he had it all along." And there are times toward the end of Reagan's presidency when he seemed forgetful. But these were probably due to the natural effects of the aging process. Remember that Reagan was 55 years old when he first ran for political office and 69 when he was elected president in 1980. Moreover, few people have more regular medical examinations than presidents and the various doctors who checked Reagan out thoroughly found no evidence of Alzheimer's Disease during his presidential tenure."

quote:

Just when the Alzheimer's began can never be known. But while the line between mere forgetfulness and the beginning of Alzheimer's can be fuzzy, a matter of gradation, Mr. Reagan's four main White House doctors say they saw no evidence that he had crossed it as President. They saw and spoke with him daily in the White House, they said, and beyond the natural failings of age never found his memory, reasoning or judgment to be significantly impaired.

Mr. Reagan ''absolutely'' did not ''show any signs of dementia or Alzheimer's,'' said Dr. John E. Hutton Jr., who cared for him from 1984 until the end of his Presidency and remains a close family friend. Extensive mental-status tests did not indicate evidence of Alzheimer's until 1993, more than four years after Mr. Reagan left office, Dr. Hutton said.

Even in hindsight, Mr. Reagan's friends and former aides said that they, too, had seen no hint of the deterioration to come. And while they acknowledged that he had occasional memory lapses as President, especially when it came to names, many said he had had these problems for years, certainly since he was Governor of California, from 1967 to 1974.

quote:

Did Ronald Reagan have Alzheimer’s Disease while he was President?

Dr Larry Altman, who was a Senior Medical columnist for the New York Times, once looked into this question and was…

“…unable to find any evidence by any medical criteria that is known to the medical profession that Mr Regan had any symptoms or signs of Alzheimer’s when he was President.”

quote:

Norman Swan: Fine. Now you've looked at the health of Ronald Reagan in some depth; what did you discover when you looked at it?

Larry Altman: I was unable to find any evidence by any medical criteria that is known to the medical profession that Mr Regan had any symptoms or signs of Alzheimer's when he was President. The signs and symptoms developed several years after he left office, but interviews with senior Cabinet officials in his last term, with his doctors who treated him on a regular basis, and other people who knew him, could turn up no evidence that there was any incidence or incidents that suggested that he had Alzheimer's. And even his biographer didn't find any evidence of it.




< Message edited by TreasureKY -- 8/4/2008 10:16:16 AM >

(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: How Many Agree? - 8/4/2008 10:40:11 AM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
I think everyone is forgetting that people should be going into govt. to *serve*, not to "lead."
Does anyone on this board feel the need to be "lead" by anyone in govt? (I mean.)
"Leaders" are in the Military, not in civilian life.
We need a good *MANAGER* in the W.H. not a "leader."
Obama's ads use the word, "world" in them.
Not a good thing!
Does he think he's going to be "leading" the German or Russian People?


_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to TreasureKY)
Profile   Post #: 27
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: How Many Agree? Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078