Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: trials over


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: trials over Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 6:56:41 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
 
Driver gets 5 and a 1/2 years.

That is one hell of a traffic ticket.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This was supposed to be a big show with fireworks and evil~doers get`n justice.

What happened?

The government had every advantage and had dirty tricks made legal.All the time money and resources and people to try the guy and they got zilch.

This is a direct result of how the bushies mis-handled the trails,evidence and prisoners.

This is one more example of the utter failure of the neo-cons to prosecute the war on terror.They`re fuck-ups, on every level.

They can`t even win a shame trail.

Note to neo-patriots:they have to be more than brown people from and "over there",......to qualify as a bad guy.

Letting OBL get away, was their greatest failure.(however one member here, actually thinks letting him go is a good idea,so there you have it)

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 8/8/2008 7:00:56 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to thishereboi)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 7:41:47 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: amenableboy

To kick of said debate, how exactly *were* people rounded up and sent to Gitmo? Were they detained on a battlefield in Iraq or the Ghanny? Or, were they detained in Detroit, crossing the street? That might be an important distinction to make before we begin our debate.



....some of them were delivered to US forces after they announced a reward for such people. To some in Afghanistan and Iraq that was easy money. Sadly we had to take their word for it that the people they were delivering weren't just disliked neighbours.

(in reply to amenableboy)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 7:47:04 AM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


Driver gets 5 and a 1/2 years.

That is one hell of a traffic ticket.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This was supposed to be a big show with fireworks and evil~doers get`n justice.

What happened?

The government had every advantage and had dirty tricks made legal.All the time money and resources and people to try the guy and they got zilch.

This is a direct result of how the bushies mis-handled the trails,evidence and prisoners.

This is one more example of the utter failure of the neo-cons to prosecute the war on terror.They`re fuck-ups, on every level.

They can`t even win a shame trail.

Note to neo-patriots:they have to be more than brown people from and "over there",......to qualify as a bad guy.

Letting OBL get away, was their greatest failure.(however one member here, actually thinks letting him go is a good idea,so there you have it)


First I think you meant to say trial, but my point is more based on who you are blaming for this.  First, you blame the troops for not handling evidence properly, I didn't realize that they needed to lock down crime scenes to collect evidence, forget whatever else is going on as long as the evidence is properly secured and documented.  NEVERMIND, the car this man was driving had SURFACE TO AIR MISSILES in it.  Minor traffic ticket.

Then you call them "fuck ups on every level", of course, I expect you will claim that you weren't refering to the troops. The folks that captured, housed, and tried this man.

Then you claim that these same troops are choosing bad guys because they are "brown people from and "over there".  I think your comment speaks for itself. 

How far back in time does the blame go, and how far up and down the chain of command, for UBL escaping?  Are you now suggesting that it would be okay to "invade" Pakistan to grab him?

This post has sunk to a new low for you, BRAVO.

_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 8:07:01 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
 
I heard a figure (on BBC News) that nine out of ten guys sent to Cuba,were inoccents, "sold" to the US as terrorists.

That`s a big percentage,90 %.You look at ten guys,and only one`s a bad guy.The rest,un-lucky slobs who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

They were actually nobodies, who were just swept up in the war and were "sold" to the US by someone settling a score or wanting easy money,etc.Imagine that,get rid of your personal enemies and get a pay day to boot.

Being that all brown people look alike and terroristy look`n and all,a lot of farmers,herders,laborers,and just regular folks got sent to hell in Cuba.Many guys who had no inclinations to,would be turned into terrorists in Cuba.

Again,another example of how inept and un-qualified the bushies have been in the war on terror.

And  another.

We need a change.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 8/8/2008 8:11:52 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 8:10:43 AM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59


I heard a figure (on BBC News) that nine out of ten guys sent to Cuba where "sold" to the US and terrorists.

That`s a big percentage.You look at ten guys,and only one`s a bad guy.The rest,un-lucky slobs who were in the wrong place at the wrong time.

When they were actually nobodies who were just swept up in the war,and were "sold" to the US by someone settling a score or wanting easy money.Imagine that,get rid of your personal enemies and get a pay day to boot.


....fair point and one that needs making.....

quote:

Being that all brown people look alike and terroristy look`n and all,a lot of farmers,herders,laborers,and just regular folks got sent to hell in Cuba.Many guys who had no inclinations to,would be turned into terrorists in Cuba.

Again,another example of how inept and un-qualified the bushies have been in the war on terror.

And  another.

We need a change.


..oh come on. The partisan stuff is getting a bit polemic even for me. Tossing the racism card around as much as this is no different to the poster that keeps putting Obama's middle name in speech marks. It's tossing mud and hoping some sticks. Please stop it......your points are far better made without the too-obvious propaganda.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 8:20:46 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
 
My point wasn`t about bigotry.

It was about fresh faced GIs on a battle field, trying to distinguish between the bad guys and the good guys.

The policy of wholesale grabbing of anyone called a terrorist and shipping them off is where the flaw and ineptitude is.


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 12:09:39 PM   
amenableboy


Posts: 19
Joined: 12/6/2006
Status: offline
quote:

Sadly we had to take their word for it that the people they were delivering weren't just disliked neighbours.


And, sadly, we just must take your word that these people were detained on the word of a neighbor. One would hope it would take more justification than that. But, of course, we do not know. If it is the case that the flimsiest pretext is used as justification for imprisoning people, perhaps, for the rest of their natural lives, I would have a problem with this. Then again, if a non-state actor decided to take up arms and kill an American soldier, I have no problem with locking them away for the rest of their natural lives.

One gets the feeling in these forums that it is more about the president than about the mission. Meaning, of course, if Obama were president, and enacting these same policies (as the next president will do, regardless of party), many here wouldn't be quite so dismissive or derogatory. Personally, I am undecided about which candidate to vote for in November, but the fact that we are in a death struggle with Islamic fundamentalists seems fairly clear to me.

I find the attitudes here particularly strange. Everyone here is involved in an alternative sexuality lifestyle. Well, those who aren't, *wish* to be involved in said lifestyle. The people with whom you appear to be identifying with would happily kill you for your involvement. And the death would not be pleasant.

This is not to say that we should regard all muslims as the enemy. Nor is it to say that we should allow our government license to lock up anyone they choose. It is only to say that, perhaps, we should move past the hyperbole and start discussing this issue rationally. It is not about one man, it is not about one president. This is now a fact of life, and it will be a fact that we have to live with for, I think, the rest of our natural lives, whether a Democrat or Republican is in office. Maybe, just maybe, it is time to get serious about this, more serious than the level of discourse one finds here.

(in reply to Owner59)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 12:40:55 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: amenableboy

And, sadly, we just must take your word that these people were detained on the word of a neighbor. One would hope it would take more justification than that. But, of course, we do not know.


...there has been a fair amount of comment on this issue in the press for the last few years.

quote:

 If it is the case that the flimsiest pretext is used as justification for imprisoning people, perhaps, for the rest of their natural lives, I would have a problem with this. Then again, if a non-state actor decided to take up arms and kill an American soldier, I have no problem with locking them away for the rest of their natural lives.


...fair enough, not many would disagree with either statement.

quote:

One gets the feeling in these forums that it is more about the president than about the mission. Meaning, of course, if Obama were president, and enacting these same policies (as the next president will do, regardless of party), many here wouldn't be quite so dismissive or derogatory. Personally, I am undecided about which candidate to vote for in November, but the fact that we are in a death struggle with Islamic fundamentalists seems fairly clear to me.


...not everything can be reduced to mere partisan politics. If, as you appear to suggest, you decry that tendency it would behoove you not to blithely continue said tendency.

quote:

I find the attitudes here particularly strange. Everyone here is involved in an alternative sexuality lifestyle. Well, those who aren't, *wish* to be involved in said lifestyle. The people with whom you appear to be identifying with would happily kill you for your involvement. And the death would not be pleasant.


...excuse me? Where, precisely, did i say that i identified with Islamic terrorists?

quote:

This is not to say that we should regard all muslims as the enemy. Nor is it to say that we should allow our government license to lock up anyone they choose. It is only to say that, perhaps, we should move past the hyperbole and start discussing this issue rationally. It is not about one man, it is not about one president. This is now a fact of life, and it will be a fact that we have to live with for, I think, the rest of our natural lives, whether a Democrat or Republican is in office. Maybe, just maybe, it is time to get serious about this, more serious than the level of discourse one finds here.



....nice to know you don't regard all Muslims as an enemy. Now, moving on, how about rationally answering my question as to whether or not the driver ought to continue to be locked up after his sentence ends. Try to avoid the partisanship you have decried. When i see you criticise McCain in the same terms you criticise Obama then i'll know you aren't a hypocrite.

(in reply to amenableboy)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 12:54:37 PM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
9 out of 10 were grabbed up on Mr Habib's word according to a report estimate. (I'd counter that with the West Point report saying 73% were a demonstrated threat, which of course admits that 27% of them were not)
Seem to forget that 5 out of 10 have been released already and sent back to their counrties as well.
They got a bit out of hand about who they took, OK I'll cop to that fog of war and all that.
And I've been critical of the slowness of the status hearings not having been handled with any speed resembling reasonable.

But over half of the folks detained have been released (420) the remaining number sits about 350 according to an NPR report.

And 30 some of them have been killed or captured again fighting in Afghanistan predominently.

The real shocker is that these military courts who everyone swore to god cound never provide a trial that was fair seem to have provided exactly that a fair verdict and a sentance that would qualify as pretty light.

(in reply to amenableboy)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 1:06:06 PM   
amenableboy


Posts: 19
Joined: 12/6/2006
Status: offline
quote:

...not everything can be reduced to mere partisan politics. If, as you appear to suggest, you decry that tendency it would behoove you not to blithely continue said tendency.


I would agree with this. But where, exactly, did you read anything in my post that would qualify as "partisan"? Please do inform.

quote:

...excuse me? Where, precisely, did i say that i identified with Islamic terrorists?


As I was addressing a point that you made, I see why you would believe I was aiming this at you. I was not, however. So, we will leave this.

quote:

....nice to know you don't regard all Muslims as an enemy. Now, moving on, how about rationally answering my question as to whether or not the driver ought to continue to be locked up after his sentence ends. Try to avoid the partisanship you have decried. When i see you criticise McCain in the same terms you criticise Obama then i'll know you aren't a hypocrite.


First, I am not sure I believe he should be locked up for the rest of his life. If the facts of the case are as presented, he received a sentence that he deserved, and it may have been a bit lenient. That said, I believe he received a fair trial, and that his punishment was just. Perhaps you missed this, but the point is that he was in Gitmo for a valid reason - he was an advocate and active participant in the actions that led to the deaths of thousands of people.

Second, your response was on point until you went off the rails a bit. You may wish to point out to me where I was advocating for on candidate or another. I have read back through my responses a number of times, and I cannot find where I have endorsed anyone.  Your strange use of punctuation aside, it is not very hard to see where you are coming from with this response. Which speaks directly to the point I was making earlier (you may wish to read through it again): it doesn't matter who is in office, we have to decide how to handle all of this anyway. This issue is not going away. It will be with us for the next thirty years. What, exactly, does the President's political party matter here?




(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 1:13:08 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
"Meaning, of course, if Obama were president, and enacting these same policies (as the next president will do, regardless of party), many here wouldn't be quite so dismissive or derogatory."

......i think it was this part of your post that gave me some trouble. It read, to me, as partisan. However, on a second look i wonder if i mispercieved your point.

Look at it this way. The sitting president, rather than being the great uniter or whatever, has polarised public opinion in the US. So, people opposed to his policies have as counterparts people who support those same policies. There seems to be little or no middle ground. So Obama is seen, by some, as bringing change and McCain is seen, by some, as being the 'more of the same' candidate.
This is why Bush is so central to these discussions.....as you rightly point out it's not really about the individuals concerned. There is a bigger, more profound, ethical debate happening in the US and the presidential vote will decide who wins.


(in reply to amenableboy)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 1:22:45 PM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
I think we are fooling only ourselves if we think that the handling of terrorists as run of the mill criminals is the only way to do this.
Further I think that those who were in fact captred by coallition troops on the battlefield are exactly where they need to be at GITMO. Those captured by others and turned over they should i my book be given some break accounting for the fact that evidence is sparse at best for them. I'm fully on record as saying that a year maybe 2 would be acceptable for getting the ststus hearing completed, but this 4 or 5 years stuff is beyond what I feel is acceptable.

I'e also been on record as saying simply this for who gets GITMO and who gets civilian trials
Captured in combat by US or other military on foreign soil GITMO
Captured by US law enforcement inside the US Civilian trial (exception active attack on military target )
Now I'm sure there are folks who would fall throguh the cracks and not sure how I'd handle those.

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 1:29:20 PM   
popeye1250


Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006
From: New Hampshire
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rule

The prosecutors attempted to put away for an extremely long time a lowly driver of a CIA operative. What are the important beans about that CIA operative that he might spill to the public that they tried to keep from the public for that extremely long time?
 
He is likely to be murdered in prison or shortly after he is released, to prevent him from making public some odd little facts that he may know.


Ten bucks says he'll have an "accident" the first month he's out.

_____________________________

"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"

(in reply to Rule)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 1:29:50 PM   
Thadius


Posts: 5091
Joined: 10/11/2005
Status: offline
On top of the valid point you raise Archer, there are other reasons some of these prisoners are still in Gitmo.

quote:

http://www.newsweek.com/id/141513

The largest block of Gitmo prisoners—nearly 100 of the remaining 270—hail from Yemen, a country that so far has resisted taking back detainees because of U.S. demands that they be put on trial back home (or, at least, that the Yemenis pledge to keep a close eye on them). "Of course, we want our citizens back," says Abdulwahab al-Hajjri, Yemen's ambassador to the United States. "But [the United States] has these conditions, so this is taking time." Other prisoners come from countries that allegedly engage in torture, such as Syria, Libya and China. Attempts to find countries in Europe willing to take them have hit a brick wall.


_____________________________

When the character of a man is not clear to you, look at his friends." ~ Japanese Proverb

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 1:35:55 PM   
slvemike4u


Posts: 17896
Joined: 1/15/2008
From: United States
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Yep... years of holding detainees in legal limbo. Years of imprisonning people without charge, without trial, without evidence provided to a court of law. Years of torture, abductions and locking up a few minors, just for good measure. Years of making up its own rules, attempting to rewrite the law, ignoring the treaties of which it is a signatory, and of being judge and jury at the same time, and the U.S. Government comes up with... the conviction of bin Laden's DRIVER. For driving people around and for being a member of Al Quaida. Well, is it completely embarrassing, or what?!

It's a really poor show. We should demand our money back: this farce has got to stop. Charge those people, or release them.
Kittin,there is another thread asking the question"what was the last movie you walked out on"....if only I could have walked out on this one 6 years ago.An earlier poster posited that these were "bad guys"picked up in most cases on the battlefields of Afghanastan...in some case's maybe,but a number of them were handed over for cash payments..bounty's paid by our government to hand over AQ baddies...not exactly unimpeachable evidence if you ask me,it would seem some were just pointed out to gain a larger payoff

_____________________________

If we want things to stay as they are,things will have to change...Tancredi from "the Leopard"

Forget Guns-----Ban the pools

Funny stuff....https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eNwFf991d-4


(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 2:12:38 PM   
Vendaval


Posts: 10297
Joined: 1/15/2005
Status: offline
The court's sentence should be respected.  According to the link, there are another 80 or so awaiting trail.  This process may take a year or longer.

_____________________________

"Beware, the woods at night, beware the lunar light.
So in this gray haze we'll be meating again, and on that
great day, I will tease you all the same."
"WOLF MOON", OCTOBER RUST, TYPE O NEGATIVE


http://KinkMeet.co.uk

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 2:17:27 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Vendaval

The court's sentence should be respected.  According to the link, there are another 80 or so awaiting trail.  This process may take a year or longer.


...agreed. My take on it is that this court process is the only thing that legitimises Gitmo......even that is a bit arguable. If the authorities then start ignoring the court system they set up then that is an enormous problem. Justice is indivisible. You can't have a bit of it here and none of it there.....it either exists or it doesn't and the US has, historically, tried to stand for justice.

(in reply to Vendaval)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 2:57:15 PM   
DomDolf


Posts: 363
Joined: 7/11/2008
Status: offline
Do you actually believe that the military has no filter on who is apprehended and what is done with them to assure that we are not imprisoning innocent people? Mistakes happen, but you are very naive if you feel that we can just grab anyone and have them sent to Gitmo. Do you also believe that the military will release ALL known facts about a person they have in custody? We do have a filtering process and we do hold back information for many and varied reasons. Therefore you cannot and will not know every person and all factors in their imprisonment.

There are separate rules for foreigners and for times of war. Our nicey nice situation for crime here in the US does not hold water well in a time of war against combatants. No, we cannot hold them forever, just until the war is over or some country agrees to take responsibility for them so we don't have to. We have a responsibility to hold known terrorists for as long as this war goes on. Releasing them puts them back on the battlefield if they are not watched closely. By the way, the battlefield goes beyond the area where troops and weapons are evident. There is strong proof that when a member of the Opposing Forces is released they will go right back to the battle. If we prevent deaths to our service members by holding the known and highly suspect personnel of the OF then that's fine with me.


(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 3:03:53 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: DomDolf

Do you actually believe that the military has no filter on who is apprehended and what is done with them to assure that we are not imprisoning innocent people?


..i think, as Archer has pointed out, that the fog of war can confuse things. A conservative estimate of those wrongly sent to Gitmo hovers around the 27% mark.

quote:

 Mistakes happen, but you are very naive if you feel that we can just grab anyone and have them sent to Gitmo.


...of course not Gitmo is visible. Rendition is another matter.

quote:

 Do you also believe that the military will release ALL known facts about a person they have in custody? We do have a filtering process and we do hold back information for many and varied reasons. Therefore you cannot and will not know every person and all factors in their imprisonment.


...neither do you. No-one does. The only oversight on this is the judicial process.

quote:

There are separate rules for foreigners and for times of war. Our nicey nice situation for crime here in the US does not hold water well in a time of war against combatants. No, we cannot hold them forever, just until the war is over or some country agrees to take responsibility for them so we don't have to. We have a responsibility to hold known terrorists for as long as this war goes on. Releasing them puts them back on the battlefield if they are not watched closely. By the way, the battlefield goes beyond the area where troops and weapons are evident. There is strong proof that when a member of the Opposing Forces is released they will go right back to the battle. If we prevent deaths to our service members by holding the known and highly suspect personnel of the OF then that's fine with me.


...there's also proof that innocents have been caught up in this.....and that because admitting a mistake may send a wrong message (or so some think) those innocents have suffered needlessly. i'm absolutely not suggesting that 100% of those in Gitmo are innocent, but if we're the side of truth and justice then one percent is too much.

(in reply to DomDolf)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: trials over - 8/8/2008 7:54:53 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
 
I have no doubt that Hamdan is guilty of aiding and helping OBL.

I`ve seen more than one photo of him with a walkie-talkie and a Kalashnikov, standing next to bin-laden.

You can`t do that and not be a high ranking member.

And still they couldn`t pin him down.WTF?

My point was that the admin., is lame,in-affective and losing the war on terror.

You think Hamdan would`a walked w/ 5.5, if he was tried by an American jury?

Forget about it.

The bushies blew it.(sorry bushsymps)The kangaroo court back-fired.

If they had just followed the law,justice might have been served and our justice system wouldn`t be a laughing stock.

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 8/8/2008 8:03:33 PM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to philosophy)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: trials over Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.078