paulr1980
Posts: 7
Joined: 8/2/2008 Status: offline
|
Hi Mike. Yes, those saying they are looking for "clients" are basically professionals being paid or needing money to sexually stimulate. While I have nothing against what two consenting people do, I personally find professionals to be automatically suspect of their claim to being truly dominant. Today nearly everyone's aunt and sister can go by the "domme" titlte. Often those claiming to be "domme" are switches or even sub. I know guys play these games with women, but it still doesn't justify the lying. I am big on honesty and being up front from the start about it. If a woman wants to put on an act in a catsuit, fine. But that is just a role she is playing if being paid as far as I am concerned. Similarly, you come across every so often a woman who might have a site claiming she is not a pro but expecting some "tribute" or payment for something, be it to have access to her site or what have you, all while she is claiming she is not a prodom and usually very critical and harsh on the professional community, claiming that she is the real deal and the others are fakes. Its such hypocracy. Run from these women. True dominant woman, I have found, are not stuck on titles, have no websites, which usually is a sign of some other agenda that is either motivated for financial gain or motivated by some unsaid pyschological and emotional issue--or both. Real dominant women can be found in as ordinary places as the grocery store. And more women are dominant than they even know. I find that your nature can bring that out in a woman and attract them to you. Women in general love a man that can be vulnerable to them and who they can trust opening up to and being vulnerable to as well. This is the purest connection you can have with another woman and if you find that great match, you both are as much slaves as masters to one another over time. It's rare compared to mere vanilla relationships, but frequent enough to be found and had if you genuinely look for it.
< Message edited by paulr1980 -- 8/9/2008 3:20:10 PM >
|