|
candystripper -> RE: -Not- another fat thread ... No, really. (8/14/2008 1:46:36 AM)
|
In reply to Maxwell: If we really were going to reject a potential partner for health issues, most men over 50 would get rejected due to untreated or untreatable ED. For some reason, ED is never spoken of openly here that I can see. I guess it's ingrained from an early age in most people, particularly women, that it beyond cruel to ever, ever say anything remotely critical of a cock.
We'd take stds f**king seriously, and would not exchange bodily fluids with anyone who couldn't prove to our satisfaction that they are really, truely free of disease. Statistically, we know -- whoosh -- there goes a full 20% or so of all of us, just for having herpes. Hell, most people cannot even NAME all the f**king stds flying around this country.
Those of us interested in 'long term relatinships' would insist on a battery of tests that would reveal such things as whether the tested person was inevitabily going to come down with Hogkins' Disease. Don't want to get stuck as a care-giver to someone in a vegetative state, after all.
We'd probably also reject those who, for whatever reason are at high risk for anything serious, including cancer, diabetes, alzheimer's, and heart disease.
Those of us interested in having a family with our potential mate -- or as one Dom so charmingly puts it -- 'looking for a breeder' -- would insist on some evidence of fertility in the other. Many people are going to be very unhappily surprised to find they are highly unlikely to reproduce.
On and on it goes...and where would it end?
IMO, we'd end up rejecting ~everyone~ but hey, that's JMO.
candystripper
|
|
|
|
