julietsierra
Posts: 1841
Joined: 9/26/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: NeedingMore220 but if I'm upset about something, they would have no idea how to relate to me. Actually, I find this true regarding others who do what we do as well. I've never found that simply calling myself a submissive or slave has made what I do - what my Master and I do - any more palatable to others who call themselves slaves and submissives if what it is we do goes against what they think is appropriate for a relationship. Let me give you a for-instance. (obligatory qualifier included) For instance, we read on here all the time about the "horrors" of getting involved with a married man. Yet, people do it all the time (*sigh* and yes, for the sake of argument, the wife knows). Now, if that submissive/slave involved with that married Dominant/Master has a problem and goes to talk to someone she trusts who just happens to be very opposed to those sorts of relationships, I guarantee you, she's not going to get any support from that person beyond "Kick him to the curb!!" No matter what she's trying to gain some insight on, for that person she tried to gain some support from, it's likely to all come back to the fact that the dominant is married - the "evil cur!!" And far from being supportive, that person will, can and has done more damage than dealing with it on one's own ever would. And that's not to mention that very often - all TOO often - what is discussed with one submissive is also the information of that person's dominant, so at least in real life, the damage that is done in the search of support is significant. If I speak to a submissive, whether the topic is cats, family members or relationships, if that person has a Master, I presume I'm speaking to him as well, and I structure my conversations accordingly. LOTS of people get in trouble presuming that what is discussed will never be brought up between submissives and their owners. juliet
|