Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double Standards


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double Standards Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 12:40:40 PM   
CreativeDominant


Posts: 11032
Joined: 3/11/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: subtee

Great questions. However. Faux News "fair and balanced?" My eyeballs almost rolled out of my head.
 
Anyway, I think it’s less a matter of quantifying higher vs. lower than it is of different higher standards. I agree Doms are expected, as leaders, to exhibit the “qualities” of leadership that are generally understood and accepted, but also with whatever individual shadings of those characteristics that are specific to each man or woman. Petty behavior, to my mind, would not likely factor in neither generally accepted nor individual definitions of a leader.

 
True, petty behavior would not factor into accepted definitions of a leader.  But then, given that we are dealing with two adults here...one of whom always has the right to say "I withdraw my submission at this moment/for this month/forever" ...neither should the submissive be allowed the leeway of petty behavior.  I can see your point regarding differing high standards but they should equate to each other and be reflective of each other, rather than vary widely.
 
quote:

There is also a huge responsibility in ceding your life to another and obeying. There can be accountability in any number of things at any time of the day or night. There is the maturity it takes to truly trust enough to yield to his or her guidance; to have become an adult and yet give over aspects of your life you’ve been taking care of by yourself—most of which society expects us to self direct. It seems to me a sub must have excellent self discipline and great willpower to “do as you’re told” in any number of situations. There is much responsibility in being a worthy reflection of a dominant both to the outside world and back to him or her.


I cannot argue with this paragraph.  There is not only responsibility and trust, but the breaking down of the walls that submissives seem to instinctively put up around themselves, despite the dominant's want...and the dynamic's need...for transparency.
 
quote:

Dominants may hold subs to a higher standard in doing that which they’d rather not. They may find it difficult to imagine the standard of ceding self motivation over for his or her impulses—whatever they may be.


Some may do exactly that.  In areas such as vulnerability, transparency, communication, many dominants do hold the submissive to a higher standard than what they set for themselves.  I cannot speak to their motivations as I make an effort every single day to be open about my feelings towards others, to allow others to see my thought process in the best way I can, to speak clearly and distinctly and at length about what I feel is right or wrong in my life, their life, the particular dynamic.  Is it difficult?  Sure.  Do I understand that I run the risk...something not addressed in your paragraph above...as being seen by some submissives as being somehow "less" dominant because I do display vulnerability and openness and transparency that many dominants do not?  (an you all know that there are submissives who do view dominants who are open, vulnerable, and transparent as somehow "less" dominant).
 
quote:

Complete selflessness may not be completely possible, but I could imagine a dominant would hold a submissive up to much higher level of selflessness than they would be able or willing to give. It seems to me there is a very high expectation and standard of vulnerability often; to be “transparent” it’s termed, I think quite aptly…to be mentally, emotionally, spiritually, intellectually and, let’s don’t forget, physically open, why, when, how and where he or she wants.



I would suppose it would depend on how you define "selflessness".  In giving herself over to the dominant and considering his needs before her own, the submissive is being selfless.  But let's not forget that it is not total selflessness as she would not be doing so if she was not getting something out of it that satisfied her, either emotionally or physically or mentally or spiritually...something that satisfied that which resides within her that she addresses as submission.  It was noted on a thread the other day that even submissives, selfless as they are, will not remain in a relationship where something within that is needed is not being fulfilled. 
Is it selfless of a dominant to give time up to try and help the submissive improve in an area of her life that she has ceded to his guidance?  Is it selfless of the dominant to nurture her when she has doubts about herself, as either a human or as a submissive?  Is it selfless of a dominant to take on not only the responsibility of making decisions but also the responsibility of stating "I fucked up" and ONLY that and not lay it off on the submissive when his decision turns out to be wrong, even if the choice he made was to try and do things in a manner suggested by the submissive?  Is it selfless when he accepts the fact that things are not great in her life right now and rather than rail at her for not being able to fuck him, cook his meals, be his "safe spot", he steps up and says "I know things are rough for you right now.  I am here for you, use my shoulder and use my heart and use my head and feel the love I have for you and the safety I provide by being the best me I can?"

As for transparency and vulnerability, I discussed those above.  Many dominants do not feel that way.  Many do.  Michael has certainly opened himself up and made himself vulnerable with his postings over the last couple of months by speaking out about his fuck-ups and his flaws.  I've certainly never been shy about revealing my faults and flaws on the boards and to those select few in my life that I deal with on a personal basis.  Do I hold some things back?  Sure...I do.  But my walls aren't as high as some and probably a bit higher than pretty few.  That isn't said to proclaim my being better or Michael being better, it is said to state that it is what WE are.

(in reply to subtee)
Profile   Post #: 41
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 12:46:51 PM   
MadRabbit


Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
It's not so much about a differing set of standards. What I consider to be virtues and vices doesn't change from me to other people. I just am a lot harder on myself than I am on other people!

The guilt, anguish and regret I put myself through when I cross one of my own virtues is much harder than anything anyone else can do to me or anything I would impose upon someone else, often to the point where my close family tells me to lighten up on myself!

That doesn't mean that the line of reasoning "Well, your just a submissive..." gets interjected into my thinking as a viable excuse for a girl doing something wrong. I am just a lot more forgiving of other people than I am myself, because I consider that to be a virtue.

As far as standards themselves, my standards are my standards and my values are my values and if they don't conicide with someone's elses standards and values for a dominant, oh well. Virtues and vices are purely subjective. There is certain things about me that can be perceived as a negative that I happen to like about myself and have no intentions of changing it to meet someone else's ideal.

_____________________________

Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions

Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 42
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 12:56:16 PM   
Honsoku


Posts: 422
Joined: 6/26/2007
Status: offline
FR

As a general rule, I hold myself to a higher standard than the general public. Partially because I know myself and what I am capable better than anyone else and partially because I like being better . I expect to be held to a higher standard as well.

How high of a standard I hold someone else depends on the person. I expect that other people will be better in some things than I am, so their standards in that regard will be held higher than I hold my own. I expect a sharpshooter to be able to hit a bulls-eye at 200 yards more often than I can. The difference is that since I don't have perfect information, I tend to be more forgiving in how I view standards in other people than I do in myself. I am more tolerant of the effect of extraneous factors on others because what might not be a big deal for me, might be a big deal for them. The better I know a person, the less forgiving my standards become. But I will almost always be more forgiving in others than I am in myself.

Should someone hold a leader to higher standards than themselves? Holding someone to universally higher standards is asinine. There is just too much variance in human ability to expect someone to be better than you at everything. You should however, hold them to at least higher standards overall than the general public, otherwise why not follow someone else? Part of being a leader is having the faith of those who follow and a key way to demonstrate that you are deserving of that faith is through excellence in behavior. If you don't care about how well your actions turn out, why should anyone think that you will care about how your actions affect them? If you don't use your own resources in a wise manner, why should anyone else think that you will use their time and effort any better?

Just remember that no matter how much you would like them to be, no one is going to be perfect and anyone that claims to be perfect should be given a wide berth.

(in reply to LadyHibiscus)
Profile   Post #: 43
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 1:16:51 PM   
MadRabbit


Posts: 3460
Joined: 8/9/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: KnightofMists

I don't care what about your so called higher standard of me is... I care about my standard of myself.

Most often.. a person's standard of others is self-serving.  If I am focused on living to the standard of the s-type.. then I have to wonder ..am I the Dominant or is the S-type the dominant.  I am sure that I excell beyond the standards of some s-types and not for others... It just so happens... I have two s-types in my life that exceed my standards and I bet I exceed theirs as well.. well some of the time we do.


I agree with this completely. I am what I am and I strive to constantly change and recreate what I am based on what my own idealization is. To apologize for what I am and to change what I am based on the opinion of another is to seek approval from them and thus become slave to them.

If your perspection of me and your standards match up with my own and you respect me and you become close enough to me for your opinion to have significant influence, then my girl's opinion serves at best as a powerful motivator to keep on progressing and improving to my own standards, but not a source of validation that I am worthy of being a "Dominant".

Power, assertiveness, and control are things I hold as virtues as myself. Some egalatarian girlfriends in the past had opinions that I was too controlling. If I had apologized for it and sought to change it, then it would have meant changing the very thing that makes me "dominant".

Self respect, pride in my accomplishments, and confidence are other virtues. If you value excessive humility and find me to be arrogant, we might have a hard time being friends or lovers.



_____________________________

Advice for New Dominants
The Unpolitically Correct Lifestyle Definitions

Obama is NOT the Messiah! He's just a VERY NAUGHTY BOY

(in reply to KnightofMists)
Profile   Post #: 44
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 1:28:55 PM   
NuevaVida


Posts: 6707
Joined: 8/5/2008
Status: offline
MR your insight is very enlightening and helpful.  Thank you for sharing it.

_____________________________

Live Simply. Love Generously. Care Deeply. Speak Kindly.



(in reply to MadRabbit)
Profile   Post #: 45
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 2:28:11 PM   
Nitefalls1000


Posts: 41
Joined: 5/22/2008
Status: offline
I hold Tops to a higher standard and I expect to be held to that same standard

(in reply to SunNMoon)
Profile   Post #: 46
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 3:16:16 PM   
heartfeltsub


Posts: 1641
Joined: 11/5/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Leatherist

quote:

ORIGINAL: heartfeltsub

The line from the song, which i can't remember the title of at the moment, "If You can't run Your own life, i'll be damned in You run mine." leaps to mind from some of these responses and sums up my feelings as well. i have an extremely high standard for myself, but if i am giving someone authority over me, i want to be damn sure they will run my life at least as well as i would on my own, and i would prefer Him doing a better job than i would do.

heartfelt


At the same time, if I have to do the extra work and time to take on more responsibility and work-I sure as hell am not going to tolerate a screw up who wastes my time, rather than freeing it up so I can be more productive.


i wholeheartedly agree with you, that is why i strive to be the best person i can be, being disciplined, self-motivated, hardworking, etc. i don't think either side of the slash should be slackers and i personally don't have a whole lot of sympathy for s-types who repeatedly cause drama and screw up their own lives. i just have even less for D-types who want authority and respect, but then don't act in a manner worthy of it.

heartfelt

_____________________________

Life is an exciting business, and most exciting when it is lived for others.

Life is a succession of lessons which must be lived to be understood.

Life is either a great adventure or nothing.

Helen Keller

50 NZ points

(in reply to Leatherist)
Profile   Post #: 47
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 3:39:12 PM   
StrongSpirit


Posts: 575
Joined: 4/10/2005
Status: offline
I expect a sub to be submissive, just as I expect a dom to be dominant.

That means no whining from a dom, but arrogance is acceptable.

That means no arrogance from a sub, but begging is acceptable

Honestly, I have been much more impressed with other tops than with other bottoms.  I have seen more arrogant subs both on line and in real life than whiny doms.

On the other hand, that might just be my desire to spank the crap out of an arrogant sub, whereas I tend to ignore a whiny dom

(in reply to SunNMoon)
Profile   Post #: 48
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 4:16:27 PM   
subtee


Posts: 5133
Joined: 7/26/2007
Status: offline
Trust me. There be whiny Doms. They be whining.

_____________________________

Don't believe everything you think...

(in reply to StrongSpirit)
Profile   Post #: 49
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/21/2008 7:53:58 PM   
sublizzie


Posts: 1252
Joined: 5/26/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble 
S-types, do you find yourself holding dominants to higher standards while cutting a break to other s types or is it one standard for all? Something else?


I have a higher standard for dominants than I tend to hold for submissives for the most part. But so many things, to me, seem to be necessary behaviors for both sides of the slash. I don't have a problem with a dominant who is open and transparent. To me, this is the sign of an emotionally healthy person. If a person whines and pouts and stamps their feet then I tend to want to change their diaper, give them a bottle and put them to bed because they obviously are NOT an adult. I have a difficult time with submissives who whine about being expected to submit. I have a very hard time with dominants who lose control and expect people to respect their behavior. For some reason I think adults who are submissive should be adult and responsible enough to follow the rules they've been given. By the same token, I think adults who are dominant should buck up, take the high road, and shoulder the responsibilities they've accepted.

_____________________________

"cooking is my kink"

Collared June 19, 2008
(uncollared 12/21/09 with his death. RIP my Santa)

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 50
RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double S... - 8/22/2008 5:43:28 AM   
MasterSwordsman


Posts: 4
Joined: 5/12/2008
Status: offline
I agree whole heartedly with yourstatments BitaTrumble. I hold myself at a higher standard as a Dominant, and expect as such in the self appointed title of Master. In many ways it seems that in recent years, there has been a bit of a schizm between those who are "old Guard" or remember the ways of proper protocol, and those whom i've yet to give a label to whom deem it acceptable to slap a submissive in the face because he doesn't like her mole. When I have met other Dominants and Masters in the past, I have always looked for their respect of the situation, and their grace in handling. I have always felt that a Dominant male, or Dominant female, should be a gentleman first and foremost, leading and guiding by example.

That said i'm sure to now have a flood of people going "Well what about the pain, the sex, the wanton desire, the power." And let me make myself perfectly clear. It has been my experience of both sides of the whip, to know that the submissive grants the power to the Dominant. Whether it be a healthy relation or not, a submissive expects a certain way of acting from her(his) chosen Dominant, of which she may be able to properly express or not. After this point it is up to the Dominant to guide, shape, and mold this expression, and to be of sound mind enough to weild the trust a submissive has given with discretion and foresight. The agreement of power exchange comes from both sides of the equation in a healthy relation. We Dominate because they submit, they Submit, because they desire our Dominance.

Balance comes in many forms, and in relation to the balance of a "vanilla" relationship, the tides are turned in the Dominant's favor. This is the nature of things as the submissive grants the scale to be tipped in the Dominant's favor, so that she may submit, but in all things there is equal exchange, though we never really know the price we pay.




_____________________________

When the God said "Let there be Light", Night and Day were formed. When man said "Let there be War", the children of Day and Night took up arms. When comes the time to say "Let there be Peace", only the twilight will remain.

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 51
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> RE: Fair and Balanced? This ain't Fox News! On Double Standards Page: <<   < prev  1 2 [3]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094