LadyPact -> RE: Do Dommes feel thrilled to watch their sub drinking their Golden nectar? (8/29/2008 1:21:37 AM)
|
Original: Pixelslave quote:
I see some merit it that viewpoint. I'm not certain that a dominant would want to think she was humiliating her sub when sharing what she thought was a precious gift to him. Perhaps a Domme who feels that way about this type of activity will be kind enough to share her thoughts on the subject with us? Perhaps I can help. For Me, there is a potential duality (and more) for many activities in a particular dynamic. It's completely possible for the same thing to speak to different parts of a person for different reasons. For this, I usually use the anology of sex, because most people will get what I mean behind it using that example. To be more specific, think of it as sex with a person you are romantically in love with. Also, for the sake of discussion, let's all understand that I am speaking of vaginal coitus. With those things in place, when you think of sex, what do you think of? That thought could be an intimate, loving, bonding act that is shared between two people with that kind of connection. It's all about being with each other. This beautiful, wonderful, sharing of the physical selves. A lot of people don't even term this as sex, but making love. Same act, but now come at it from a different angle. Same two people, but a different motivation. Lust, desire, capture, use of another to fulfill certain animalistic needs. It's all about the drive. The hot, intense need for sexual satisfaction. I hope you'll excuse the language, but term this as a good old fashioned fucking. As I said, same act, but different motivations. It can be one thing on one day, and something completely different on another day. It can depend on the mood, or which feeling a person wants to express, or any of a multitude of different reasons. Perhaps one afternoon, watersports might be a loving, bonding experience, and then the next time, someone could be feeling a bit differently, grab by the hair and....... Well, you get the idea.
|
|
|
|