popeye1250
Posts: 18104
Joined: 1/27/2006 From: New Hampshire Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DomKen Seems to me you aren't going to support any democratic candidate and should therefore stick to supporting your prefered candidate rather than trying, rather ham handedly, to stir up trouble and doubt in other candidates supporters. You might try convincing people of the superiority of your chosen candidate instead. For instance you could extoll the virtues of having professional lobbyists actually being the top level of White House staff. Or maybe you could explain how appointing another "strict constructionist" supreme court justice and overturning Roe v Wade will be good for women's health. How about explaining how an invasion of Iran won't be quite the same spectacular disaster as the invasion of Iraq? Maybe how the young man, at the tender age of 51, exercised poor judgement when he tried to influence federal regulators for Keating but since has become a banking and economics expert? DomKen, and how about explaining why Obama wants to "double foreign aid" and further enrich a whole bunch of people in Washington including lawyers, lobbyists, and corporations? Foreign aid should be ended and that money returned to the Taxpayers to whom it rightly belongs! Or,.....how he'd "get our Troops out of Iraq" only to put them in a new war in *Darfur* where we would be bogged down for decades! What the hell does *Darfur* have to do with us? Obama would be the "extension of Bush" not McCain! He wants to do the same things as Bush only more!
_____________________________
"But Your Honor, this is not a Jury of my Peers, these people are all decent, honest, law-abiding citizens!"
|