|
Termyn8or -> RE: Evolution Instruction in FL (8/24/2008 8:58:37 PM)
|
Oh boy this could be a hot topic indeed. I just did a search for "Ten questions to ask your biology teacher about evolution" and what I found was not convincing to say the least.
First of all they seem to attack Darwin specifically, saying photos were fake and all that. That the whole theory is based on non-facts. At the same time they are selling us non-facts that are much more far fetched. Preposterous I say, to say the least. they point out what they call faked evidence and fixed photos, yet in the Bible there are some pictures. Do you think these are actual photos of Jesus, Moses and whoever else ?
When you are in chemistry or metallurgy classes and they put up a representation of a molecule, do you think you are really looking at a molecule ? Hell no. Nobody has ever seen one, but for some reason the science and technology built upon such representations seem to work, or there would be no transistor, no internet, no alot of things. Truth is science has proven itself a hell of a lot more than religion.
The fact that you can read this post proves that their ideas on metallurgy and electronics was correct. The common transistor, of which there are millions in your computer proves they were on the right track. The building block of those ICs therein contain these transistors, and even though they couldn't see it, they figured out the silicon, doped with gallium (I think) produces a polarized material, and when sandwiched between layers of silicon doped with arsenic produces a device that can control a larger current by application of a smaller current, thus amplification. The very (CRT) monitor you may look at uses phosphorous similarly doped to produce the different colors. They are made into tiny dots and you can see them with a magnifying glass.
Now just how would these people come up with all this if their representative models as well as theories and conclusions were wrong ?
Really though, even as a dictator, I would only mess with this in one way. As a leader of a country such as this, abiding by the Constitution, creation via evolution. I have questions for the evolutionists as well.
The first day God created the Earth, how long was a day ? Were there people with calendars there to mark each passing day by our definition of a day ? Surely any one of them with a brain cell would admit that before the word day was defined, it could have been millions of years.
Some other day, God created Woman. Thing is God created every other species on the planet and gave them gender and reproductive abilities, why would an omnipotent being even think not to do that in the first place when creating his masterpiece, the pinnacle of Earthly domain ? To joke, because the subject is a joke but a very sad one, I guess Adam was allowed to jack off when he got his morning woodie. Onanism had not yet been defined.
Then to forestall the perception of incest they write that someone goes off to the land of Nod to get a Wife. Wait a minute, I thought there were only two people on the planet not long ago, what did this guy find, a non-human ?
Then they get to this tree of knowledge. That's the real kicker. Adam and Eve realize they are naked and sew fig leafs to cover their genitals. Do they contend that we were supposed to remain naked like animals and just stay in the garden of Eden forever ? That this is what our Creator wanted ? There is no way I believe that, and if true, why was the tree of knowledge even there ? To test them, like a Dom testing a sub or something. If that is the case why do we have the spirit to excel and to outdo ourselves and others ?
You ask creationists these questions and I can almost guarantee an answer that will be gibberish. They won't stop, you have to grab them by the throat and choke them, and say "Listen, none of this had happened yet". They have no conception of a timeline, nor anything else. It is all faith.
Last but not least, the Vatican has more gold than the US government, but they need your money.
That sums it up IMO. I firmly, and strongly believe that children can be taught the ways of their Parents, but under NO circumstances should anybody be allowed to indoctrinate them with religion. It is the most crippling thing that can happen tyo the human mind, and I think that exposing kids to religion should be punished by death.
Someone said we would have had a Man on the Moon in the year 700, at first I was going to express doubt about that statement, but having read what I have written, I am not so sure. The church has made great scientists and scholars of the past recant their most brilliant theories, well they did give them the choice of being burned at the stake.
I will agree that 90% of my problems are of my own making, but the problems of the world, I would say that religion has caused about 70% of it. Look around you, if you take the blinders off you can see almost. Look past the surface, and while you may not like what you see, it is better to know that it is there.
T
|
|
|
|
