RE: Is religion important in politics ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


meatcleaver -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:38:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: sirsholly

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver


I've spent quite sometime in America, going to church is like going to a club, there is social pressure to do it and to be seen to do it.




your ignorant generalization could be offensive to those of us Americans who go to church for the right reasons....if your opinion mattered.



What are the right reasons for believing in superstition?

I can understand people saying they believe for political reasons, that is being rational if not entirely honest.


this doesn't even justify a response.[8|]



Then why did you respond?[8|]




sirsholly -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:41:13 AM)

to say so. Problem?




Alumbrado -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:41:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: RealityLicks

It's not about the right to worship but the right to worship privately, if at all.  Our Foreign Secretary is an atheist.  He wouldn't be free to do the same job in your country yet you invoke the hoary myth of the pilgrim fathers and their search for religious freedom.

I can't speak for every vagary of law in each European country but EU law is based on democratic principles which allow real freedom of religion - ie, to have none if that is your belief.  If any EU country violates that right, an EU citizen has recourse in law.

I don't know of any "religious army" except for the Swiss Guard in the Vatican, a ceremonial escort.  As for powers to convict or tax; see my comments regarding the European Convention on Human Rights above.  Clearly, you last visited Europe during the plague of 1347 or you'd know that things have moved on a little.


quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

The observation that US politicians wanting to get a majority of the votes try to appear like as many members of the majority as they can, is hardly denying others their right to worship differently.
Kennedy debunked the myth that one had to belong to a specific WASP church to win office, other politicans have debunked the notion that one 'must' be a Chritian at all. 

When was the last Catholic head of state in England, Denmark, etc, or the last Protestant ruler in Italy?

The notion that Europe by contrast has no church state link, sounds fine and grand and all.... Except for that pesky matter of the facts that no religion in the US has the legislated power to tax, or convict, or raise an army, or legally require a politician to belong to a specific denomination etc, as they do in so many other places.



So where is the evidence that if the US somehow or another implemented this change that no one is willing to define, the rest of the world would applaud?



You are losing touch with reality... I'm not the one who posted about the puritans, or  pilgrims.  I did mention those who came to America to get away from your European monarch and church obsessed culture...some of us are still very successful at it, in spite of the best efforts of others.

This is just a continuation of your desperate tap dance to keep any of those nasty old facts from sticking to you.  You made a sweeping generalization that is being torn apart, and all you have in defense is irrational debate tricks.









celticlord2112 -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:41:20 AM)

quote:

What are the right reasons for believing in superstition?

"Belief" itself is irrational by definition.  Yet it is the one thing that will trump logic and reason every time.

That is the order of things.




RealityLicks -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:48:07 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

As an interesting aside, in 2006 Keith Ellison was the first Muslim elected to the US Congress.  The first Muslim elected to the British Parliament was Mohammad Sarwar in 1997.



Wrong.  I can remember Keith Vaz being elected in 1987 and he's still serving.  Near my home is a street named after Nairoji, who was a Zoroastrian MP in the 1800s.  The point isn't belonging to another religion than CofE, it's the freedom to have none.




genevieve66 -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:53:10 AM)

If we could ever have a president with enough balls and intellectual prowess to admit his atheism that would be an amazing moment. A true progressive intellectual free thinking person for fuck sake, can you imagine it? Maybe someday. Hell, we still have people thinking that Obama is a muslim and Bush is a good leader, can't expect miracles...[8|] 


quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

What are the right reasons for believing in superstition?

"Belief" itself is irrational by definition.  Yet it is the one thing that will trump logic and reason every time.

That is the order of things.





Alumbrado -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 9:59:45 AM)

Keith Vaz? The one who wants Rushdie's head on a platter...the one who says there is no such thing as absolute  freedom of speech when it comes to disagreeing with his religion's doctrine?  Yeah, he's as non-religious as they come.[:D]

As Jefferson pointed out, it isn't rule by the majority, it is rule by the majority who vote... which means that politicians are going to resemble the majority of voters.  Any assertion that no one in America has freedom to believe as they wish is pretty weak if that's all you have to pin it on.

BTW, Jefferson didn't do too badly in politics while disavowing affiliation with any religion...




celticlord2112 -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:07:27 AM)

quote:

Wrong. I can remember Keith Vaz being elected in 1987 and he's still serving. Near my home is a street named after Nairoji, who was a Zoroastrian MP in the 1800s. The point isn't belonging to another religion than CofE, it's the freedom to have none.

Keith Vaz is a practicing Roman Catholic.





philosophy -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:16:32 AM)

FR

.......religion used to be politics. Or at least a tool of politics. Henry VIII comes to mind. What i find interesting is that the US has laws that theoretically provide a seperation of church and state, yet the apparent Democratic will trumps that the vast majority of the time. Are there any members of the Senate or Congress who are open aethists? It would be interesting to know if the religious demographics of those institutions mirror the demographics of the population as a whole.




celticlord2112 -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:27:10 AM)

quote:

Are there any members of the Senate or Congress who are open aethists? It would be interesting to know if the religious demographics of those institutions mirror the demographics of the population as a whole.

http://www.adherents.com/adh_congress.html

Broadly stated, yes they do.




meatcleaver -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:30:24 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

Keith Vaz? The one who wants Rushdie's head on a platter...the one who says there is no such thing as absolute  freedom of speech when it comes to disagreeing with his religion's doctrine?  Yeah, he's as non-religious as they come.[:D]



Keith Vaz is a Christian and was stating a political view, not a religious view.

I'm making the assumption here you think Vaz is a muslim.




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:30:36 AM)

i thought politics was the new religion...for the rich




meatcleaver -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:33:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

i thought politics was the new religion...for the rich


Religion has always been politics. As Charlemagne pointed out, his biggest political error was to have the pope crown him and so give the papacy divine right over kings. Napoleon refused to be crowned by the churchg for that very reason.




philosophy -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:35:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

Are there any members of the Senate or Congress who are open aethists? It would be interesting to know if the religious demographics of those institutions mirror the demographics of the population as a whole.

http://www.adherents.com/adh_congress.html

Broadly stated, yes they do.



...thanks for the link. Couldn't find any openly aethist though.......

It would seem that those who have a religious belief are open about it, and good for them. Those who have no belief though don't seem confident enough to be open about it.
i appreciate the qualification (broadly stated), it makes sense. Where it seems to break down is in those with no religion.  i'm sure there are some aethists in the US, that part of the demographics doesn't seem to be represented.
What this means for the putative separation of church and state is rather unsettling. It implies a cherry picking approach to the constitution. So everyone is right alongside the right to bear arms, peaceful protest, the pursuit of happiness etc.........but that pesky separation business seems to get a bit overlooked.




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:38:05 AM)

that's ok, i don't follow the BS that is the US government anyway




philosophy -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:40:15 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: michaelOfGeorgia

that's ok, i don't follow the BS that is the US government anyway


....but do you watch the weather reports? i assume you do, because weather can directly affect your life. It's a sensible thing to do. Same with politics. You don't have to like it, but it will affect your life as surely as a hurricane.




michaelOfGeorgia -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:41:32 AM)

nope...i have weatherbug...if something important happens...it usually tells me




celticlord2112 -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:44:42 AM)

quote:

What this means for the putative separation of church and state is rather unsettling. It implies a cherry picking approach to the constitution.

Not true.  As these are elected representatives, the Constitution has no relevance to the topic at hand.

The Constitution forbids Congress from enacting any law respecting the establishment of religion or the free exercise thereof.  If the people, in exercising their right of the franchise, opt not to vote for atheists, nothing in the Constitution suggests they do otherwise.

The Constitution is properly silent on how people "ought" to vote.




RCdc -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 10:49:53 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: meatcleaver

quote:

ORIGINAL: Alumbrado

Keith Vaz? The one who wants Rushdie's head on a platter...the one who says there is no such thing as absolute  freedom of speech when it comes to disagreeing with his religion's doctrine?  Yeah, he's as non-religious as they come.[:D]



Keith Vaz is a Christian and was stating a political view, not a religious view.

I'm making the assumption here you think Vaz is a muslim.


He is a roman catholic, not christian nor muslim.
 
the.dark.




sirsholly -> RE: Is religion important in politics ? (8/28/2008 11:05:00 AM)

Roman Catholics are Christian.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875