RE: Obama's speech. (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


popeye1250 -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 10:55:35 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Celeres

quote:

ORIGINAL: popeye1250

The reason I don't like Obama is because he's too much of a Leftist weenie.
If we caught Bin Laden alive Obama would want to give him a "trial!"
And he'd make sure he had a muslim bible in his jail cell!
McCain would attach a chain around Bin Laden's neck attached to a 200 pound block and give him a kick and push him right into the pit at "Alligator Adventure."


Haha, gotta love Street Justice... "a nation of thugs" is what we will become.



Awww, poor Bin Laden![sm=river.gif]
I bet he'd give the alligators diarea!
Enough with this "martyr" crap, just go right into Pakistan and kill him or capture him and feed him to the gators.
You don't need to "analize" it!
He's a COWARD and a murderer! Nothing more nothing less!




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:03:27 AM)

Did Obama give a speech last night???

I can't find anyone on the news talking about it today... what did he say????




Owner59 -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:06:38 AM)

Now it`s about an un-known crook from butt fuckville,USA.

Funny how the news is.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:10:58 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

Now it`s about an un-known crook from butt fuckville,USA.

Funny how the news is.

Where? I haven't seen anything regarding Senator Obama and Rexko in today's news cycle?




FatDomDaddy -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:20:37 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

butt fuckville,USA.




LOL... rhat statement is exacrly why common Americans hate Liberals.




rulemylife -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:38:49 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59

butt fuckville,USA.




LOL... rhat statement is exacrly why common Americans hate Liberals.


What's a "common American"? 




Mercnbeth -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:42:34 AM)

~ Fast Reply ~
 
I feel bad that the speech from Olympus is getting the short shift. I found it most enlightening.

The Senator pointed out the fact that more Americans were working for less, had homes in foreclosure, see their homes losing value, had difficulty affording college, and couldn't afford to put gas in their cars. Jobs they go to and work voluntarily, homes they bought voluntarily, education that is not guaranteed by the Constitution or any amendment to it, cars that are bought and used as a end decision process. Senator Obama said that all these problems continue because the government didn't and doesn't "respond". What I waited for was exactly HOW the Senator would respond in the event he became President. Did anyone hear any further commentary that could be interpreted as an answer?

Will you expect and demand answers before you cast your vote?  Are you ready to blinding go forth with someone who can point out the obvious but is unwilling to assign any blame to the perpetrators, the people who made those decisions regarding residence, job, mode of transportation? Although it wasn't the Senator, someone else at the convention went beyond these adult made decisions and furthered the case of excusing failure by saying that people shouldn't have to, or be expected to relocate in order to get a "good job". Alluding to the requirement that businesses should bring whatever job or responsibility to the place where people live, and not where the work is. I tried to imagine the construction boom that was occurring in Vegas being outsourced to Detroit; but don't think that manufactured housing was what Steve Wynn has in mind for his next casino.

Forget for a minute about how the Senator will fund his proposals. Let's give him an open checkbook. What is the reality of an Obama administration? Will your choice of housing be government determined? Will everyone be a government employee working out of your government subsidized home? Will you be driving in a government provided personal vehicle, or be allowed to have a personal vehicle? Will you have a say in what education and what level you child can achieve or will your progeny be enrolled in a blanket education program brought to you by the same government bureaucracy which brought you "No child left behind"?

I listened - that is what I heard. How about you?  




rulemylife -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:56:01 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:


Again, is it not a victory that he remains free? Especially after Cowboy Bush's "dead-or-alive" speech. You don't think that makes us look weak and foolish in the eyes of the rest of the world, particularly the terrorists?

For what it's worth, I thought then Bush made a mistake with that "dead-or-alive" bit. Great theater, lousy policy. It is far too easy to make a martyr of him--and that would be the antithesis of justice.

Bin Laden free and hiding in a cave is not a great outcome, merely the best outcome. Even Arafat usually managed to find a decent hotel.

quote:

Far be it from me to question your motives, but somehow I think that if this had been an Al Gore administration you and every other conservative Republican would be beating the "why haven't we captured Bin Laden?" drum.
I can only speak for myself and say you would not--for the reasons I have already outlined.


I do understand your argument, but it comes down to whether we want to let him be seen as a martyr or whether we want the U.S. to be seen as a country terrorists can attack with impunity because we lack the will to capture them.  Not to mention the very idea of justice for the U.S. but especially for the families of 9/11 victims.




slvemike4u -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 12:05:47 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Ummmmm Mandela was a national hero.Ummmm ,obl was behind 9/11.

Ummmm.....Osama bin Laden is a hero to the purveyors of radical fundamentalist Islam--who have shown more than ample willingness to kill and die for their beliefs. What we think of him is immaterial--what has relevance is what his followers think of him. To the South African government, Nelson Mandela was a terrorist, and we would do well to remember that: the cliche that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" holds true even for bin Laden.

As for justice:

The goal of every terrorist is to draw the eyes of the world upon himself. The terrorist wins when everything people do they do looking around for warning signs of the next terrorist attack. The terrorist wins when we make him relevant. The terrorist loses when we make him irrelevant.

Bin Laden behind bars is bin Laden forever at center stage. Bin Laden killed in a hail of gunfire is a martyr to Islam and a hero on a par with Saladin. Both outcomes are bin Laden victorious.

Giving bin Laden the victory he craves is not my idea of justice.
Actually CL,I find myself agreeing with you on this.The terrorist indeed loses when we make him irrelevant and I am all for that.With one small caveat though,first my government keeps faith with it's citizens and the memory of his victims...and brings him to justice in one form or another for the crimes perpatrated against us.To make an argument that we are better served by him sitting in his cave is illogical and an afront to those that died on Sept.11th 2001..




rulemylife -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 12:06:57 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

~ Fast Reply ~
 
I feel bad that the speech from Olympus is getting the short shift. I found it most enlightening.

The Senator pointed out the fact that more Americans were working for less, had homes in foreclosure, see their homes losing value, had difficulty affording college, and couldn't afford to put gas in their cars. Jobs they go to and work voluntarily, homes they bought voluntarily, education that is not guaranteed by the Constitution or any amendment to it, cars that are bought and used as a end decision process. Senator Obama said that all these problems continue because the government didn't and doesn't "respond". What I waited for was exactly HOW the Senator would respond in the event he became President. Did anyone hear any further commentary that could be interpreted as an answer?

Will you expect and demand answers before you cast your vote?  Are you ready to blinding go forth with someone who can point out the obvious but is unwilling to assign any blame to the perpetrators, the people who made those decisions regarding residence, job, mode of transportation? Although it wasn't the Senator, someone else at the convention went beyond these adult made decisions and furthered the case of excusing failure by saying that people shouldn't have to, or be expected to relocate in order to get a "good job". Alluding to the requirement that businesses should bring whatever job or responsibility to the place where people live, and not where the work is. I tried to imagine the construction boom that was occurring in Vegas being outsourced to Detroit; but don't think that manufactured housing was what Steve Wynn has in mind for his next casino.

Forget for a minute about how the Senator will fund his proposals. Let's give him an open checkbook. What is the reality of an Obama administration? Will your choice of housing be government determined? Will everyone be a government employee working out of your government subsidized home? Will you be driving in a government provided personal vehicle, or be allowed to have a personal vehicle? Will you have a say in what education and what level you child can achieve or will your progeny be enrolled in a blanket education program brought to you by the same government bureaucracy which brought you "No child left behind"?

I listened - that is what I heard. How about you?  


Yep, that's what I heard too!  He clearly wants to turn us into Stalinists and re-create Soviet policies.  Soon we'll be standing in lines for bread and toilet paper and referring to each other as comrade. 

Of course, this is just a fast reply.  I really didn't have the time to read all of what you said.




Vendaval -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 4:00:24 PM)

Yes, that was spot on!  I loved the ordinary people that came to the podium and spoke about their own life experiences and why their are voting for Senators Obama and Biden.


quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol
Independently from Obama's speech, I loved this line from this ordinary guy from Indiana, Barney Smith: "We need to put Barney Smith before Smith Barney." It pretty much says it all.




caitlyn -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 5:02:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn
Have you considered that those wanting to see a more detailed plan ... not ultra detailed, but a good general framework would be nice ... are the same folks that would like to get away from the popularity contest of our current system?


Maybe it's the folks like you who make it a popularity contest.  It's not hard to find the answers to the questions that have been raised here, but you're not going to find them listening to one or two speeches and a few sound-bites on your evening news. 


That of course, assumes that I have watched only one or two speeches and a few sound bites on the news ... a pretty big assumption to make towards a total stranger.
 
Truth be told, I have right around 90 hours this year, working as a volunteer for a candidate for the Democratic nomination ... three hours a night, three nights a week, for ten weeks. I don't suppose anyone here noticed that I suddenly had time to start posting again, right after my choice exited the race. Watching and reading information from all candidates, from both parties ... probably ten times that number.
 
But, perhaps you are right, and a stockholder in this company has no right to ask the important "how and why" questions of someone that wants to be our CEO.




Thadius -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 6:41:25 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn
Have you considered that those wanting to see a more detailed plan ... not ultra detailed, but a good general framework would be nice ... are the same folks that would like to get away from the popularity contest of our current system?


Maybe it's the folks like you who make it a popularity contest.  It's not hard to find the answers to the questions that have been raised here, but you're not going to find them listening to one or two speeches and a few sound-bites on your evening news. 


That of course, assumes that I have watched only one or two speeches and a few sound bites on the news ... a pretty big assumption to make towards a total stranger.
 
Truth be told, I have right around 90 hours this year, working as a volunteer for a candidate for the Democratic nomination ... three hours a night, three nights a week, for ten weeks. I don't suppose anyone here noticed that I suddenly had time to start posting again, right after my choice exited the race. Watching and reading information from all candidates, from both parties ... probably ten times that number.
 
But, perhaps you are right, and a stockholder in this company has no right to ask the important "how and why" questions of someone that wants to be our CEO.


Well said, and thanks for taking part in the process.




Owner59 -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 7:21:51 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

quote:

ORIGINAL: celticlord2112

quote:

ORIGINAL: Owner59
Ummmmm Mandela was a national hero.Ummmm ,obl was behind 9/11.

Ummmm.....Osama bin Laden is a hero to the purveyors of radical fundamentalist Islam--who have shown more than ample willingness to kill and die for their beliefs. What we think of him is immaterial--what has relevance is what his followers think of him. To the South African government, Nelson Mandela was a terrorist, and we would do well to remember that: the cliche that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter" holds true even for bin Laden.

As for justice:

The goal of every terrorist is to draw the eyes of the world upon himself. The terrorist wins when everything people do they do looking around for warning signs of the next terrorist attack. The terrorist wins when we make him relevant. The terrorist loses when we make him irrelevant.

Bin Laden behind bars is bin Laden forever at center stage. Bin Laden killed in a hail of gunfire is a martyr to Islam and a hero on a par with Saladin. Both outcomes are bin Laden victorious.

Giving bin Laden the victory he craves is not my idea of justice.
Actually CL,I find myself agreeing with you on this.The terrorist indeed loses when we make him irrelevant and I am all for that.With one small caveat though,first my government keeps faith with it's citizens and the memory of his victims...and brings him to justice in one form or another for the crimes perpatrated against us.To make an argument that we are better served by him sitting in his cave is illogical and an afront to those that died on Sept.11th 2001..




Pffft,..

Yeah,that Tim McVeigh,what a martyr he`s become.since his execution.


What a bunch of crap!


If we captured that rat.tried and killed him, like we did terrorist McVeigh,he`d be a fading memory by now.


Instead he`s having more children and planing more attacks on us.


But neo-cons call that success.It takes all kinds.






corysub -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 7:33:23 PM)

Hillary stands corrected... Obama does not just bring a speech in 2002 to the table...he brings TWO speeches,
2002 and 2008.  In one night he doubled his resume'.

Interesting to note that the second place position on the republican side has more executive experience actually
a Governor running a large state, as well as a small town as a very successful mayor.  As Governor, she cut
wasteful spending, eliminated pork (including the bridge to nowhere and, in fact, the state is building their own
bridge and a $40 billion pipeline.  Hopefully, she will convince McCain to reverse is stand on ANWR.  The
woman is also an avid hunter and demolished the Wildlife Federation claim (and money solicitation) that the
poor polar bears are an indangered species, suing the U.S. Government on behalf of the State of Alaska.

McCain putting her on the ballot has renewed my energy to support the republican ticket even though I now
consider myself an independent after their horrendous pig like, democrat like, rape of the public purse.




subtee -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 7:43:18 PM)

Here's the Polar Bear dealio. She sued the Bush admin over it

As marine mammals, polar bears are regulated by the federal government, not the state. Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne last week made the listing decision and said it was based on three findings. "First, sea ice is vital to polar bear survival. Second, the polar bear's sea-ice habitat has dramatically melted in recent decades. Third, computer models suggest sea ice is likely to further recede in the future," he said.
http://www.adn.com/polarbears/story/413710.html





Thadius -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 10:11:31 PM)

http://www.businessandmedia.org/printer/2008/20080506084437.aspx

http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=3066

I guess it is wrong to ask that policy be based on science and not on agendas...  I know the poor penguins and polar bears are drowning and starving...[8|]




Vendaval -> RE: Obama's speech. (8/29/2008 11:16:50 PM)

I think that all of us need to be asking the "how and why" of the candidates. It is very admirable of you to have put in the hours of volunteer work and careful consideratin of the issues and problems facing America today.


quote:

ORIGINAL: caitlyn
But, perhaps you are right, and a stockholder in this company has no right to ask the important "how and why" questions of someone that wants to be our CEO.




Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 4 [5]

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.03125