Alumbrado
Posts: 5560
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: philosophy quote:
ORIGINAL: Alumbrado The 'debating tactic' that I regularly use, that is pissing you and others off, is that of not accepting things just because you claim they are so... ..no it isn't. And you telling us it is wont work either. What you do, is distort what others write, attack the straw man argument you have just invented and then have a go at people when they don't play the game that you have decided they ought to play. You're absolutely not alone in doing this and have, in the past, rightly held those people up as bad arguers. You have also in the past made me realise when i have made an error. i may not enjoy the experience but i thank you for it. However, by ducking and diving around in this thread you are destroying whatever credibility you have earned. The issue i have repeatedly concentrated on is the inherent bigotry in the sign Camille saw. You have not, at any point, seriously addressed that issue.....and have, instead, either pretended it isn't there or attacked other posters on points they haven't tried to make. This is the sort of thing you are capable of catching and confronting in others........but you appear to be blind to it when it's your behaviour at issue. Definitely someone here is blinded... but I have no trouble seeing post after post where I expressly addressed by disagreeing with your assertions. (If it is only 'addressing' when someone agrees with you, you've pretty much proven my earlier point). It is not the case that the lack of French in a curriculum is neccesarily either bigotry, isolationism, dishonourable, or worrisome in the extreme. Assertions that you issued as a condemnation, a judgement, and finally as a challenge. When asked how or why you came to those conclusions relevant to the desire for such a streamlined curriculum for employment purposes, your responses were framed in such erudition as accsuing me of being on drugs and denial of your own words. If it bothers you when people ask such questions of your assertions, and it bothers you when people bring up that your past denying of clearly printed words on a page feels like deja vu, your remedies are obvious.
|