aftrshock
Posts: 17
Joined: 12/2/2007 Status: offline
|
Being a techie and working in the service industry, I see lots of problems associated with Vista. Honestly, the main issue is that the system requirements for all of the visual niceties are very high; if you don't have a dual-core processor, 2 gigs of RAM, a dedicated video card, and a higher-performance 7200rpm drive with an 8mb cache buffer or above, Vista's going to hose your machine. Celeron processor? Forget it. 512 on ram? Forget it. Integrated video? Forget it. Vista's resource-hungry, and the 'security' feature that asks you 3 times for every action whether you actually want to do it or not is incredibly annoying; Linux actually started this ages ago, but it stores your password for 10 minutes. It's a security feature called 'sudo', meaning superuser do. Now, Microsoft is much like a conman; they've already in the works a newer release, called Microsoft 7. If things look the same way as Microsoft's past, Vista is much like ME; 98 was a solid release (sort of), SE better; like XP SP2. Then ME came out, and destroyed everything, and a short while later, we were graced with XP, though we hated it at first. Looks as though Microsoft is making everybody up their hardware and get higher-end systems for this poorly created OS, meanwhile they're addressing the gripes people had and are fixing, or improving on (making worse) them for the newest OS release. As far as OS and niceties and ease-of-use, I applaud Apple's creation OS X. Honestly, I'm not a huge fan of the prior releases; the only thing I like about them is that they used FreeBSD as a basis. However, Leopard truly is the world's most advanced operating system. It makes your computer easier to use, more functional, more visual, and all over nicer and better. Easiest case-in-point: backups. I have at least 20 customers, per week, who bring their computers in to me because they have failing harddrives. Depending on how failed they are, I can typically retrieve all of their datas without incident. However, on very, very bad cases, the data is corrupted, or lost. How many of these people had a backup? Almost none. Out of those who had a backup, how many of them know how to use it or restore files? Almost none. Got a mac? got an external harddrive? Plug it in. Time Machine (in Leopard) will say, hey, you want to use this for time machine? You say yes, it makes a backup. Lost something? click time machine, search in the spotlight for whatever you're missing, and click restore. done. Harddrive fried? Whole computer died? that external drive contains an exact copy of everything; all your files, settings, applications, you name it. In a Windows machine, if your machine fails, you'll have to reinstall windows, reinstall all your programs, etc, etc. Also, if you want to put in a new OS, you'll have to do the same, and if your motherboard fails or similar, you might be able to 'repair' your installation on a new box, but typically, you'll have to reinstall. Not so with el mac; just plug in your backup drive, and whatever machine is just as yours was. If Microsux could take a few pages from the Leopard book, they would spend the money Apple does to find out how people actually -use- their computers, rather than trying to squeeze the most from every end-user. I need a hobby.
|