aravain -> RE: Who else didn't glue themselves to the tv over 9/11 ? (9/12/2008 12:30:53 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: MrRodgers I mourn all of the dead that DIDN'T HAVE to DIE and went up into those building to save lives, did just that...and didn't come down. Does anybody try to be a dead hero ? I think not. Furthermore, no moral ambiguity is created by whom one does or doesn't remember or mourn for their death. Hmmm... That sort of opinion makes me tend to assume that the speaker believes in an 'afterlife' that is *worse* than current existence. Which would be fascinating to talk about. But, if you believe in christianity's 'heaven' or 'reincarnation' or any number of other benevolent 'afterlifes' then mourning, which in essence is wishing that someone wasn't dead, didn't have to die, could still be alive, etc. IS a major sign of disrespect. It is effectively saying "hello, I don't think you deserved to experience a better existence yet" to the dead person, or "I'm too weak to last without you". Both of those are a huge insult in my book, especially the latter. And I really disagree with your last statement. If you're mourning for someone because they didn't 'deserve' to die, and also place some sort of value or quality on 'human life' then... in essence, unless you're mourning EVERY human being that dies (including the muderers, rapists, and general 'evil' people) you ARE creating a moral ambiguity in yourself. You're saying 'this person is worth more than that person' which, in most religions/belief systems/whatever, is a judgement call that people are not supposed to make. *shrug* In response to the other people who are surprised by the indifference, cynacism, or anything else in this thread... really? You're surprised? Did you think that, in a society which practically preaches egotistical behavior, everyone would bind together on some abstract concept of mass-empathy? Apathy is not a myth. Misanthropy is not a myth. People being/acting/reacting different is not a myth.
|
|
|
|