Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 4:55:04 PM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Projecting,.....much?

_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 6:06:03 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lronitulstahp

You seem to assume that people of faith aren't capable of grasping scientific fact.  Be sure to tell that to Newton and Galileo.



You do realize that both Galileo and Newton faced religious persecution because of their scientific findings?
They both were men of faith yet their science found them in conflict with their respective churches.
We don't doubt their findings today, yet the same types are people that believed the Sun revolved around the Earth have their descendants in today's Creationists. 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo
Galileo's championing of Copernicanism was controversial within his lifetime. The geocentric view had been dominant since the time of Aristotle, and the controversy engendered by Galileo's presentation of heliocentrism as proven fact resulted in the Catholic Church's prohibiting its advocacy as empirically proven fact, because it was not empirically proven at the time and was contrary to the literal meaning of Scripture.[7] Galileo was eventually forced to recant his heliocentrism and spent the last years of his life under house arrest on orders of the Inquisition.

No. 760: Galileo, Newton, and Math
Galileo died, and Newton was born, in 1642. That was a time of terrible religious
persecution. During their lives, 50000 women were accused of witchcraft ...
http://www.uh.edu/engines/epi760.htm

(in reply to lronitulstahp)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 6:14:09 PM   
lronitulstahp


Posts: 5392
Joined: 10/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

  You do realize that both Galileo and Newton faced religious persecution because of their scientific findings?
They both were men of faith yet their science found them in conflict with their respective churches.
We don't doubt their findings today, yet the same types are people that believed the Sun revolved around the Earth have their descendants in today's Creationists. 
  Once again, for the people in the cheap seats....You seem to assume that people of faith aren't capable of grasping scientific fact.  Be sure to tell that to Newton and Galileo. 
i am not being facetious rml when i say i think it's pretty clear why i chose these two particular individuals to prove a point.  i pretty much assume most of us know the historical meaning behind it.


 



_____________________________

Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for." -Bob Marley

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 6:30:59 PM   
Hippiekinkster


Posts: 5512
Joined: 11/20/2007
From: Liechtenstein
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cyberdude611

A LOT of people believe in creationism though.
That's their problem.
quote:

 And to their credit, science has not disproved it.
Science has not disproved the Chocolate Easter Bunny myth of creation either. Why is that? Well, it's up to those making an assertion to prove the validity of their assertion.
quote:

Science does not know how life began.
Given the current SOTA in molecular genetics, it won't be long until something self-replicating is made in the lab.

quote:

And Palin never said only creationism should be taught. She said it should be taught along with evolution. What is interesting is if you go to the university level you will find on-campus religious services. You will find on-campus religious organizations. And you will find on-campus classes involving christianity, islam, and many other religions. But you go down to the public high schools and such stuff is banned.
I'm not aware of an Uni-level science class which allows extra-curricular organizations to teach their mythology in the classroom as fact. If you find one, you just might have the beginnigs of an argument. Until then, it's just another red-herring strawman.

quote:

Now has having those religious organizations on those college campuses interfered with science and learning? Not at all. In fact going back, the Big Bang theory was first proposed by a Catholic preist in Belgium who had a facination with astronomy. Charles Darwin wrote about his belief in god until the day he died. These people who thought up these theories of evolution and big bang were not atheists.

Albert Einstein had a good quote for this....
"Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind."
"All religions, arts and sciences, are branches of the same tree."
 And this fallacy is called "Argument by authority". 

You don't have any valid arguments; merely internally inconsistent rhetoric. 

_____________________________

"We are convinced that freedom w/o Socialism is privilege and injustice, and that Socialism w/o freedom is slavery and brutality." Bakunin

“Nothing we do, however virtuous, can be accomplished alone; therefore we are saved by love.” Reinhold Ne

(in reply to cyberdude611)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 6:40:12 PM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lronitulstahp

quote:

  You do realize that both Galileo and Newton faced religious persecution because of their scientific findings?
They both were men of faith yet their science found them in conflict with their respective churches.
We don't doubt their findings today, yet the same types are people that believed the Sun revolved around the Earth have their descendants in today's Creationists. 
  Once again, for the people in the cheap seats....You seem to assume that people of faith aren't capable of grasping scientific fact.  Be sure to tell that to Newton and Galileo. 
i am not being facetious rml when i say i think it's pretty clear why i chose these two particular individuals to prove a point.  i pretty much assume most of us know the historical meaning behind it.
 

 

You seem to not be able to grasp my point so let me try again.
 
Religious people seem to want to equate great scientists with religion to prove their points. 

In all the examples listed here, the scientists were either agnostic, atheist, or chastized for their science by the religions they believed in.

The point being science and religion have never shared a happy co-existence.  To claim that the people of Newton's or Galileo's time were accepting of scientific theory any more than Creationists accept Evolution is not accurate, regardless of the individual beliefs of the two. 

(in reply to lronitulstahp)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 6:44:36 PM   
slaveboyforyou


Posts: 3607
Joined: 1/6/2005
From: Arkansas, U.S.A.
Status: offline
quote:

We don't doubt their findings today, yet the same types are people that believed the Sun revolved around the Earth have their descendants in today's Creationists. 


Yes and Darwinism led to social Darwinism which incorrectly applied "survival of the fittest" to every aspect of humanity.  The Nazis used Darwinism as "proof" that certain groups of people were "subhuman" and polluting the gene pool, and thus needed to be eliminated like a virus. 

You also have other examples in history where secularism has went to the extremes and resulted in evil acts.  Stalinist purges, the French Revolution, Chinese Cultural Revolution, the Khmer Rouge, etc, etc.  Science doesn't have all the answers to life, and it's the fool that believes so. 

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 6:56:49 PM   
lronitulstahp


Posts: 5392
Joined: 10/17/2007
Status: offline
my point was that as a religious person, i am still able to have my beliefs and a knowledge of and appreciation for Science...but i can only speak for myself.  Hmm, sort of like Newton and Galileo. (the people of their time weren't the examples i chose to use, but them)  Not all faithful people are fundies. Not all Christians align themselves with the religious right.  i mean, i'm a slut for goodness sake!!!


_____________________________

Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for." -Bob Marley

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 7:26:15 PM   
Jack45


Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Sanity

It is my opinion that someone would have to be extremely insecure for them to maintain that there is any subject which could not be discussed, in regards to science.



It is still the theory of evolution after all. What the gods in the 'White Coats' can't take a little competition?

Education should be free of censorship of opposing views, it shouldn't be TABOO to suggest that maybe humans do not have ALL THE ANSWERS.

Government schools aren't a great place for education anyway.
The GOP revolution old Newt was going to do away with Dept of Education but it is now bigger than ever.

(in reply to Sanity)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 7:30:06 PM   
Jack45


Posts: 220
Joined: 12/20/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou

Yes and Darwinism led to social Darwinism which incorrectly applied "survival of the fittest" to every aspect of humanity.  The Nazis used Darwinism as "proof" that certain groups of people were "subhuman" and polluting the gene pool, and thus needed to be eliminated like a virus. 

You also have other examples in history where secularism has went to the extremes and resulted in evil acts.  Stalinist purges, the French Revolution, Chinese Cultural Revolution, the Khmer Rouge, etc, etc.  Science doesn't have all the answers to life, and it's the fool that believes so. 


Good points. Check out DEMOCIDE, it puts your analysis in even a darker, grimmer view.

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/13/2008 8:12:32 PM   
farglebargle


Posts: 10715
Joined: 6/15/2005
From: Albany, NY
Status: offline
The notion that the earth is less than 10,000 years old is laughable, right?

So, anyone who believes it is also laughable, right?

She's so damn stupid, she CHOSE not to tell her sexually promiscuous unwed teen daughter NOT TO USE A RUBBER!

And choosing her, shows that McCain's addled, too.

Good thing the whole thing is rigged and YOUR vote isn't even counted, eh?

_____________________________

It's not every generation that gets to watch a civilization fall. Looks like we're in for a hell of a show.

ברוך אתה, אדוני אלוקינו, ריבון העולמים, מי יוצר צמחים ריחניים

(in reply to Jack45)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 12:49:33 AM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou
Science doesn't have all the answers to life, and it's the fool that believes so. 

the only answers science does not address are those of inherently subjective value.

The gaps in human understanding about the universe they inhabit could be as easily filled with belief in omniscient and omnipotent chocolate pudding.


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 12:54:27 AM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jack45

It is still the theory of evolution after all. What the gods in the 'White Coats' can't take a little competition?

this is one of the most antiquates misunderstandings of colloquial use of language. Scientific "theories" are not half-ass notions pulled out of the rears of marsupials. That people use the word "theory" in day to day activity to describe any wild notion they've dreamt up after a night of heavy alcohol does not alter how the term applies in scientific circles, where a "theory" is a consistently verifiable, constantly tested, near-universally-true hypothesis that stand perennial rigorous analysis.




_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to Jack45)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 12:59:27 AM   
NihilusZero


Posts: 4036
Joined: 9/10/2008
From: Nashville, TN
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: ThatDaveGuy69

But let's play a little mental game.  Let's pretend that creationism worms its way into the PUBLIC curriculum.  You've suddenly created a religious institution out of a state-funded school.  Lot's of constitutional problems there, but that's another thread.  Now let's pretend that I have a religion that I practice (uhg!) and teach to my children.  My religion says a great turtle shit out the universe after an all-nighter of margaritas and grilled shrimp.  Now we all have to accept that MY religion is JUST AS VALID as any other.  So when does the great turtle myth of creation get taught?  And what do I tell my kids when they are mocked for not beleiving that "god" did it all?  How many versions of creation are you willing to have taught?  How many are you willing to fund?  It spirals out of control pretty damn fast, doesn't it...

This is fantastically to the point and is precisely how Michael Shermer dealt with the issue during a public debate with noted creationist Duane Gish. This is an excerpt:
quote:

For me the highlight of the evening was when I polled the audience as to how
many agreed with Gish that the creation story should be taught in public
schools. A veritable phalanx of hands shot up. I then went through a series
of slides of different creation stories from around the world, asking for a
show of hands as to how many think that this creation story or that creation
story should be taught in public schools. Of course, no one raised their
hands because they think all these other creation stories are silly myths.
These are from the chapter in my book Why People Believe Weird Things on how
to debate a creationist:

--No Creation Story from India, where "The world has always existed as it is
now, unchanging from eternity."

--The Slain Monster Creation Story from Sumeria-Babylonia, where "The world
was created from the parts of a slain monster."

--The Primordial Parents Creation Stories from the Zuni Indians, Cook
Islanders, and Egyptians, where "The world was created by the interaction
of primordial parents."

--The Cosmic Egg Creation Stories from Japan, Samoa, Persia, and China, where
"The world was generated from an egg."

--The Sea Creation Stories from the Burmese, Choctaw Indians, and Icelanders,
where "The world was created from out of the sea."

--The Spoken Edict Creation Stories from the Mayans, the Egyptians, and the
Hebrews, where "The world sprang into being at the command of a god."

When I got to this last slide no one raised their hand, so I left if up and
said, "Uh, are you SURE you don't want this last one taught, because THIS
creation story is YOURS." Slowly it dawned on them what I was doing. Some
hands started to go up, but the rest didn't want to be trapped any further. I
then drove home the point that to insist that the government force public
school children to learn one religious creation story to the exclusion of all
others is not only in violation of the First Amendment's establishment
clause, it is religious bigotry. Since they didn't seem to be getting my
point, I went over the top and yelled out "Shame on you. SHAME ON YOU. This
is bigotry. It is racism. And it is wrong."


_____________________________

"I know it's all a game
I know they're all insane
I know it's all in vain
I know that I'm to blame."
~Siouxsie & the Banshees


NihilusZero.com

CM Sex God du Jour
CM Hall Monitor

(in reply to ThatDaveGuy69)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 4:37:22 AM   
PrincessJ77


Posts: 372
Joined: 7/25/2008
From: point A
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Thadius

Now that would be one hell of a question to ask during the debates...

"As a Christian, do you believe the description of creation in Genesis to be true, if not what other portions of the Bible do you believe to be false?"

Anybody seen a place to submit questions for any of the debates?   I got's me a few that I would love to ask of both candidates.


Let me know if you do and when it's televised. 

(You just made my morning, thanks.)

(in reply to Thadius)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 5:02:10 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: lronitulstahp

my point was that as a religious person, i am still able to have my beliefs and a knowledge of and appreciation for Science...but i can only speak for myself.  Hmm, sort of like Newton and Galileo. (the people of their time weren't the examples i chose to use, but them)  Not all faithful people are fundies. Not all Christians align themselves with the religious right.  i mean, i'm a slut for goodness sake!!!



Probably my fault for not expressing my intention more clearly.  I did get your point that they were religious and that didn't prevent them from making great scientific discoveries.  I was only trying to make a seperate point that belief in their religion wasn't exactly a big help in their scientific work either. 

(in reply to lronitulstahp)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 6:26:05 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: slaveboyforyou


Yes and Darwinism led to social Darwinism which incorrectly applied "survival of the fittest" to every aspect of humanity.  The Nazis used Darwinism as "proof" that certain groups of people were "subhuman" and polluting the gene pool, and thus needed to be eliminated like a virus. 

You also have other examples in history where secularism has went to the extremes and resulted in evil acts.  Stalinist purges, the French Revolution, Chinese Cultural Revolution, the Khmer Rouge, etc, etc.  Science doesn't have all the answers to life, and it's the fool that believes so. 



Not quite sure what you're trying to say here, but the Nazis also used Christianity for that same proof.  Hitler, by all accounts was extremely religious, though he had his own warped view of it.

While Communism is secular, none of the Communist upheavals you mentioned were directly anti-religious in nature.  They were efforts to consolidate political power.

The French Revolution was only anti-religion in the sense that the Catholic Church was seen as the enemy because of the church's support of the monarchy and the state-sanctioned taxes that the church received for that support.  It was not a secular revolution.

I agree science doesn't have all the answers to life, but the answers it does have came from research and evidence to support those answers. 

Still not sure what your examples have to do with that though.

(in reply to slaveboyforyou)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 8:13:43 AM   
DedicatedDom40


Posts: 350
Joined: 9/22/2005
Status: offline
quote:


What i cant understand, is the need to be so condescending towards people with religious beliefs.




I dont have an issue with religious beliefs.  But I do acknowledge that there are religious beliefs that go a little bit overboard and are dangerous to society.

I would describe Pentacostals as dominionists. It is not that they simply do not believe in the separation of church and state - they believe the church (theirs) should BE the government.

Like it or not, Palin was a practicing Pentacostal for 34 years. The fact she has not been actively involved since 2002 would simply classify her as a "Third Wave" Pentacostal. These are people who do not actively associate with the Pentacostal church, and do not carry the Pentacostal label, but do believe and live by many of its teachings.

When I watched the Jesus Camp movie (and I do believe it accurately portrayed the Charismatic Pentacostal), I left the theater knowing that Islam is not the only radical religious extremists that this country needs to be worried about. The Christian message was fine, the guerilla tactics to indoctrinate kids and infiltrate government were all wrong.  Pentacostals may not like Muslims, but at least the radical Muslim movement is not currently infiltrating our government the same way the radical Christian movement is (Monica Goodling and her ilk). I do believe that current government officials who are the most militant about defeating Islam are those who were voted in by the radical Christian right.

How does this nation discuss exactly where Palin is situated in this relgious realm when every attempt to do so results in claims of poitical persecution by godless liberals?  I can assure you that any election candidate that possessed radical Islamic views would make religion a front and center issue. So why doesnt a trail of association with radical Christianity warrant the same discussion?

I have said it before, the vast majority who blindly support this woman without any discussion on her religion are worse than the Obama junkies who blindly follow him and think he's a god.




< Message edited by DedicatedDom40 -- 9/14/2008 8:45:30 AM >

(in reply to lronitulstahp)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 8:28:45 AM   
Archer


Posts: 3207
Joined: 3/11/2005
Status: offline
Folks talk about red herrings and don't see the red herring they are using at that same moment at all.

Palin withihn dyas of the original comment said specificly she wanted the students to have the ability to discuss the ideas of creationism vs evolution in school.
But it does not have to be part of the curriculum.

ie If a student brings up the topic teachers should be prepared and permitted to allow civil discussion about the topic.

Additionally even after being elected Governor of Alaska she made NO MOVE to put creationism into the state curriculum.
NO MOVE, seems if she was the religious nutcase the left leaning blogs would have you think, she'd have made some move to include it in the state curriculum.

"But don't be afraid of information and let kids debate both sides."

"I don't think there should be a prohibition against debate if it comes up in class. It doesn't have to be part of the curriculum."

Edited to add, I work as a scientist and I certainly believe that evolution is the closest answer we have to how life began, as far a science goes.

But I like multiple other scientists have found my way to merge the idea of God creating the universe, with the science of evolution. The two ideas do not conflict unless you have a literal as we understand time 7 days story.



< Message edited by Archer -- 9/14/2008 8:32:19 AM >

(in reply to rulemylife)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 8:36:50 AM   
Owner59


Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006
From: Dirty Jersey
Status: offline
Right Archer,they are soooo open minded,allowing the two to be taught together.Why can`t we be just as open minded?


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

So,Archer,do you think the earth was formed about 10,000 years ago,in 6 days?

And how the fuck can you teach that fairytale,...and the truth,in the same classroom?

Why not teach the Hindu creation story as science fact or the Shinto concepts of the world`s creation?

Many American Indian`s believe the earth was formed when a great bird brought some soil and layed it in the water.

About as provable, as the Christian story.

Why not teach that,along with science?

Hey,while we`re being so open minded about this,let`s teach the Pagen`s creation story along with Creationism (and real science).

Wouldn`t that make the fundies happy?  lol

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~


Jesus Camp.

If you want a good look at the right`s culture war,the fundies and their dark side.

Mixing and ruining(both) religion and politics.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dD2Hyiitpys

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXQ8GH1xwxg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LwPfsE9qcGQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXJcTZ9n69s

< Message edited by Owner59 -- 9/14/2008 9:18:27 AM >


_____________________________

"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals"

President Obama

(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck - 9/14/2008 8:43:41 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Creationism has nothing to do in science class. Let's stop pretending it's a scientific theory, we all know better and that it's a religious myth - those that argue otherwise have a political agenda. If it really has to be discussed in public schools, why not teach creationism as part of a political awareness course (it's a brand new doctrine, and that's no accident), or at a stretch, in the context of religious studies? That will definitely allow students to make up their own mind since, apparently, this is what it's all about.

_____________________________



(in reply to Archer)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Sliming Palin - FactCheck Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094