Owner59
Posts: 17033
Joined: 3/14/2006 From: Dirty Jersey Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Archer Everyone seems to ignore the second part of the statement. "at least not without a corresponding reduction in government spending. " McCain has already specified and had a consistant record that spending cuts are part of his adgenda. Problem is that the media and the Democrats have not bothered to ask the obvious question. Mostly because they don't want to focus the debate on the fact that they have NO spending cuts other than military spending planned. What will McCain cut??? Well so far he's been able to confine his confirmed spending cuts to earmarks. But even I am not believing that those are the only cuts he intends to make. Want to make the race better? then somebody needs to ask him specificly what he intends to cut toher than earmarks. I would call McBush`s tax-cuts for millionaires,... an "earmark". They are the same in every respect. Benefiting a very few, at the expense of us all. Payed for with moneys we don`t have,there for financed by borrowing the money from China/Saudi Arabia. Only rich/connecting people getting access to lawmakers for their pork. Etc.,etc. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Does it really make sence to go into debt,to give rich people bigger tax-cuts,when it`s pretty obvious that the economy is not benefitting from them.And knowing we all(the taxpayers)will foot that bill.
_____________________________
"As for our common defense, we reject as false the choice between our safety and our ideals" President Obama
|