wldflwr -> RE: Biden/Palin "debate" to be a complete farce (9/26/2008 9:03:00 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hizgeorgiapeach quote:
ORIGINAL: Hippiekinkster IIRC, Obama taught Constitutionsal Law. I think one would need a passing familiarity to do that. Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. Those who can't teach, administrate. His erstwhile time as an instructor doesn't seem to have done him any good - his voting record still sucks diseased mucus, what liitle there actually IS of his voting record, considering that he simply voted "present" the vast majority of the time. What, exactly, does a vote of "present" mean in the halls of congress? Does it mean "I'm here, but I'm to apathetic to vote"? Does it mean "I'm here, and I Want to vote X, but my party says vote Y, and I can't go agains the party line"? Does it mean "I'm here, and I want to vote X OR Y, but that would hurt my money machine"? Or perhaps it simply means "I'm here, but I'm to stupid to have a clue what's going on, so I'll fake it." Senator Obama did in fact vote "present" on several occasions, but obviously you have no idea what that means. The "present" vote is used by lawmakers in situations where they agree, in spirit, with a bill, but the current version of the bill is not good enough to vote "yes" due to expense, riders or earmarks that are entirely inappropriate, or inadequate planning or funding. The "present" vote is taking a stand and says a lot more than if the Senator had just voted "no". The Republican Party leaders understand this. They are lawmakers, it's what they do everyday as part of their job. What they were counting on was that YOU would not understand the meaning of the "present" vote. Now you do.
|
|
|
|