rulemylife
Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: FatDomDaddy Reading this thread I am reminded a question I always ask myself, why do liberal defenders always respond to questions of corruption, slight of hand, bending the truth, and supposed dirty campaigning with "Yeah, well the Republicans do it too and/or do it worse"? I don't know, but my guess is because the so-called questions of corruption against Obama that people keep posting are invariably rumors and unsubstantiated allegations. I have yet to see anything credible here. But this is an issue of free speech right? So, that being the case, why aren't conservatives complaining of McCain's strong-arming the press? Since he nominated Palin he has refused to answer legitimate questions, refused to participate in interviews with those he has deemed critical of him, and, in general tried to bully the media. This man is running for President of us all, not just of the Republican Party. Doesn't that tend to limit free speech by intimidating the media? He's beginning to use the same tactics Bush used in '04. Remember Democrats being refused admittance to his campaign events. Remember the "loyalty oath" the RNC required to be signed before admittance? A loyalty oath, for God's sake. How much more totalitarian and less respective of free speech could you be? Yet, the same people whining about this non-issue were strangely silent then. I mean, this was a sitting United States President who was allowed to restrict access to hearing his views based on party affiliation. So why is it not legitimate to say the Republicans do it too, and worse? Especially when these abuses by the Republican Party were widely reported by mainstream media sources and we're here debating a topic authenticated by the respected journalism of soon-to-be-famous Hank the blogger.
< Message edited by rulemylife -- 9/29/2008 7:24:35 AM >
|