Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Congress 3 USA 0


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Congress 3 USA 0 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 2:18:55 AM   
TheUtopian


Posts: 259
Status: offline
quote:



Currency arbitragers then take advantage of this split. They buy cheaper dollars on the open market, then sell then to the Fed, which would be forced under its obligations to pay the arbitrary fixed price. This further devalues the currency, so arbitragers invest their profits in more dollars at the true lower value, selling them to the Fed at the fixed higher price, etc. etc., pumping more and more money out of the government under the value of the dollar becomes so out of whack that the Fed would be forced to devalue the currency----and then the cycle starts again, until the currency is almost worthless, and inflation is rampant.


Our currency is almost worthless right now. In fact, if were not for the intimidation factor of the US military---and the gullibility of certain trading partners---we'd have to exchange gold as a form of payment for imported goods.

The current floating rate scheme encourages our government to spend into oblivion....and while you may be technically correct about the system's weakness through its susceptibility to speculation, the basis point for its creation was to eliminate speculation.

Just like with the financier-driven derivatives model that is crushing the system right now, we need to contain and declare-war-on those who buy and sell large blocs of money for no other purpose than to make profits.

Like I mentioned in reference to competitive-devaluation one-upsmanship, ala global trade - At least fixed parities/parity-between-currencies provided the crucial benefit of price predictability: which meant that international traders would know that dollar-denominated bills of exchange used in international import-export- transactions could be expected to vary no more than plus or minus 1% over their three month or six month period. You don't have anything close to that with this crapy floating rate scheme.

The floating rate scheme is purely financier-driven - and you and I have a fundamental difference in philosophy in that respect.


quote:


The evidence of credit markets freezing is already there---banks are reluctant to lend to each other, so they are unable to continue their day to day business as usual, and must hold their assets (hurting profits, incidentally) instead of participating in the money market. Should this continue, banks may be reluctant to lend to business and consumers too, and banks unable to meet cash flow demands will cease to exist, obviously never loaning again. The fear mongering is great, yes, but the problem does essentially exist.

Yes, the bill sucks, is a band-aid, and manipulates the situation for the benefit of the wealthy elite. That's why I'm glad it failed in the House. But realistically, something will need to be done---preferably more at the consumer end. We'll see what "they" propose next.


The Federal Reserve doesn't seem to be frozen up. Based on what I've been reading it seems as though they've extended over 1.5 trillion in credit over that last 45 days to a wholw host of Bankers, financiers, swap houses, etc.

Since we've already nationalized AIG, Fannie & Freddy, why not keep going and just incrementally nationalize the Federal Reserve and force it to directly issue credit only to production-driven factions of ''mainstreet'' with an emphasis on rebuilding our infrastructure, new and alternative forms of transportation, health care, manufacturing, defense production, etc, etc.

And while we're at it, go with Peter Defazio's--- My congressman----idea of instituting a ''Tobin themed'' securities transfer tax on all Wall Street transactions. It would raise billions.

Anyways.....there's so many more alternatives to just handing over more sheep to the wolves.




- R


PS - The end of Bretton Woods was mentioned just for the sake of noting the specific point in time we began our tailspin.{My opinion}

< Message edited by TheUtopian -- 10/2/2008 2:31:57 AM >


_____________________________

Vae Victus! - Woe to the conquered....

My tears are the cure for cancer - I sweat testosterone, bleed black, and piss excellence.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 61
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 2:27:12 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
The Federal Reserve, our Central Bank, is not a "bank" the way you think. It controls money supply and regulates the banking system.

Nationalize it? It's the federal agency in charge of monetary policy. It's not a business, public or private.

And it can't "freeze up," as it has the power to create money at will.

The problem is that the actual banks are nervous about lending to each other, and yes, that puts the brakes on credit.

----------------------------------

(separated because this point seems a tangent)

All currency, backed or not, has only the value extended by the strength of and confidence in the government issuing it.

Money is a concept, not a thing. It's a means to facilitate trade, hold value, and management repayment of debt.

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 10/2/2008 2:33:10 AM >

(in reply to TheUtopian)
Profile   Post #: 62
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 2:41:59 AM   
TheUtopian


Posts: 259
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

The Federal Reserve, our Central Bank, is not a "bank" the way you think. It controls money supply and regulates the banking system.

Nationalize it? It's the federal agency in charge of monetary policy. It's not a business, public or private.

And it can't "freeze up," as it has the power to create money at will.

The problem is that the actual banks are nervous about lending to each other, and yes, that puts the brakes on credit.


I'm talking about forcing the member banks---through the nationalization of the Federal Reserve---to issue credit in the name of the US government. Bypass member-bank authority by way of our government.

Bypass the banks by directly issuing credit.



- R





< Message edited by TheUtopian -- 10/2/2008 2:47:37 AM >


_____________________________

Vae Victus! - Woe to the conquered....

My tears are the cure for cancer - I sweat testosterone, bleed black, and piss excellence.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 63
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 2:46:36 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
You aren't understanding this.

The Federal Reserve exists by creation of Congress. It's Directors and Chair are appointed by the President. It's literally not possible to "nationalize" it---it's already an agency of the federal government.

If the government wants to extend credit, that would have to happen through the Treasury department--which is why the bailout bill puts handling this in the hands of the Secretary of the Treasury.

"Member Banks" aren't banks in the sense you mean either---they are essentially field offices of the Fed.

To "force" banks to offer credit in the manner you suggest would mean nationalizing the commercial banks. We've already essentially nationalized some investment banks, while the rest have become commercial banks (and thus are now under Fed jurisdiction). To nationalize commercial banking would mean a severe departure from capitalism.

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 10/2/2008 2:55:38 AM >

(in reply to TheUtopian)
Profile   Post #: 64
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 2:55:14 AM   
TheUtopian


Posts: 259
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Musicmystery

You aren't understanding this.

The Federal Reserve exists by creation of Congress. It's Directors and Chair are appointed by the President. It's literally not possible to "nationalize" it---it's already an agency of the federal government.

If the government wants to extend credit, that would have to happen through the Treasury department--which is why the bailout bill puts handling this in the hands of the Secretary of the Treasury.


No - It's clearly you who seems to not understand.

You seem think that without the banks we can't dispense credit. That's simply not true.We issue credit directly through the treasury/government, bypassing the banks.

Very simple.


- R




< Message edited by TheUtopian -- 10/2/2008 3:01:51 AM >


_____________________________

Vae Victus! - Woe to the conquered....

My tears are the cure for cancer - I sweat testosterone, bleed black, and piss excellence.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 65
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 2:56:42 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline
quote:

You seem think that without the banks we can't dispense credit. That's simply not true.We issue credit directly through the treasury, bypassing the banks.


Which I just said.

And obviously private money exists too, but without the banking system, the transactions costs would soar.

That's true even working through the Treasury, incidentally.

< Message edited by Musicmystery -- 10/2/2008 3:00:56 AM >

(in reply to TheUtopian)
Profile   Post #: 66
RE: Congress 3 USA 0 - 10/2/2008 3:10:00 AM   
TheUtopian


Posts: 259
Status: offline
quote:



And obviously private money exists too, but without the banking system, the transactions costs would soar.

That's true even working through the Treasury, incidentally.


I would wager that the 2 1/2 to 3 percent JP Morgan Chase charges us on the lend back far exceeds those costs.



- R

By the way....here is a partial excerpt from exceptional article that surrounds the nationalization of the Federal Reserve. For the dude with the beard....

quote:

McKinney: Nationalize the Federal Reserve September 25th, 2008 · Cynthia McKinney, who earlier put out a ten point plan to address the financial crisis, has now expanded on that to add four more actions, including nationalizing the Federal Reserve, auditing firms, prosecuting any criminal activity and eliminating derivatives trading.
Cynthia McKinney


A Gift for a Generation: A U.S. Financial System of Our Own
September 25, 2008 Last week, I posted ten points (that were by no means exhaustive) for Congressional action immediately in the wake of the financial crisis now gripping our country. At that time, the Democratic leadership of Congress was prepared to adjourn the current legislative Session to campaign, without taking any action at all to put policies in place that protect U.S. taxpayers and the global community that has accepted U.S. financial leadership. Those ten points, to be taken in conjunction with the Power to the People Committee’s platform available on the campaign website at (http://votetruth08.com/index.php/resources/campaignplatform), are as follows:
12. elimination of all derivatives trading;
13. nationalization of the Federal Reserve and the establishment of a federally-owned, public banking system that makes credit available for small businesses, homeowners, manufacturing operations, renewable energy and infrastructure investments; and
14. criminal prosecution of any activities that violated the law, including conflicts of interest that led to the current crisis. Ellen Brown, author of “The Web of Debt” writes at http://www.webofdebt.com/articles/, “Such a public bank today could solve not only the housing crisis but a number of other pressing problems, including the infrastructure crisis and the energy crisis. Once bankrupt businesses have been restored to solvency, the usual practice is to return them to private hands; but a better plan for Fannie and Freddie might be to simply keep them as public institutions.” Too many times politicians have told us to support the “free market.” The unfolding news informs us in a most costly manner that free markets don’t work. This is a financial system of their making. It’s now past time for the people to have an economic system of their own. A reading of the full text on the Congressional “Agreement on Principles” for the proposed $700 billion bailout reveals the sham that this so-called agreement truly is. Today our country faces an economic 9/11. The problem that is unfolding is truly systemic and no stop-gap measures that maintain the current bankrupt structure will be sufficient to resolve this crisis of the U.S. economic engine. Today is my son’s birthday. What a gift to the young people of this country if we were to present to them a clean break from the policies that produced this economic disaster, the “financial tsunami” that former Comptroller General David Walker warned us of so many months ago and instead offered them a U.S. economic superstructure that truly was their own.



< Message edited by TheUtopian -- 10/2/2008 4:08:08 AM >


_____________________________

Vae Victus! - Woe to the conquered....

My tears are the cure for cancer - I sweat testosterone, bleed black, and piss excellence.

(in reply to Musicmystery)
Profile   Post #: 67
Page:   <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Congress 3 USA 0 Page: <<   < prev  1 2 3 [4]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.059