tsatske -> RE: weight issues (10/8/2008 7:12:31 AM)
|
Darcy, the insurance you mention makes a difference. Most private insurances, here, will pay for a nutritionist only for a specific health problem (which for some reason morbid obesity is not one of - ??? - how crazy is that) - and then will genrally pay for one or two visits. The nutritionist will give you some pamplets and discuss the dietary needs of your condition with you. Diabetics have it better, we get to go see 'diabetic educators' as well, so that gets us some extra visits. But rather WW or a nutritionist or a diet coach or what have you, yes, in the states, it is going to be out of pocket. By that measure, WW is cheap, at $10 a week. however, i just approve of the WW program in the same way I approve of AA, almost - it really works. If it were free, I would be talking it up just as much. My experience with OA was not as positive. WW meetings are what I WISH OA was, and they work. at OA, everyone seems to be - well, still fat. And, they assure you, it's about running a good program and growing spirtually, it's not about weight loss anyway. That's why i do WW instead. I run a good program already, in AA, and i am as spirtually (and spherically) grown as i need to be, again, i get that in AA. What i want now, however unimportant you (you being the OA member giving me the 'what's important' schtick, not YOU) think it is, is to lose weight. I am going to die of Morbid Obesity if I do not lose weight. To stand there with some still bigger than me after "3 wonderful years in the program" OA member telling me the weight loss is not the important thing, seems to me like an AA member saying not drinking isn't important, just so you are running a good program and growing... So i guess the reason WW works for me, is it feels natural. Like i said, it is what I wanted OA to be. (except that it does have a fee, of course)
|
|
|
|