Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

RE: Watching the Debate ...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Watching the Debate ... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 12:47:13 AM   
meatcleaver


Posts: 9030
Joined: 3/13/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: corysub

President and don't wait for the "re-write". For example,  the Soviet Unions first assesment of young Jack Kennedy was tht he was naieve, inexperienced and the typical "lets negotiate an honorable defeat" democrat that pushed them to put missiles 90 miles offshore.  They "mischaracterized" his words and his determination and we found ourselves on the brink of an atomic war.  Scary times not to be repeated.


Joe Biden was right when he said the "Presidency is not a place for on the job training".  It would be great if Obama would give any evidence that he has the skill set to actually deliver and execute on the "words" he so elequently delivers.  Sorry, I don't see it... Would love to see that evidence from some of his supporters here. Obviously, Obama is a quick study and has shown a lot of "flexibility" in his stand on issues.  However, the "real world" is not a debat, and the residency is not a job for on the job training!   


I don't want to puncture your national fairy tale but read your history, the Soviets got what they wanted. The Soviets wanted to put nukes onto Cuba in response to the US siting missiles in Turkey aimed at Russia and Russia wanted the US to withdraw its missiles from Turkey. At some point during the Cuba crisis the US did agree to withdraw its nukes from Turkey and the Soviets ended up with what they wanted in the first place.

< Message edited by meatcleaver -- 10/8/2008 1:02:39 AM >


_____________________________

There are fascists who consider themselves humanitarians, like cannibals on a health kick, eating only vegetarians.

(in reply to corysub)
Profile   Post #: 21
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 4:37:16 AM   
PlayfulOne


Posts: 1047
Status: offline
FH,

Boy how we forget.  Was Pakistan ever actually an ally?

I seem to remember we were "spreading democracy" as W put it.  Yet, and please feel free to correct any error here,  we were more than happy to buddy up with President Musharraf.  Do you not think President was a rather iffy term for someone who took over in a military coup, suspended the constitution (not once but twice) and then appointed himself.

Musharraf dragged Pakistan along for the ride while he did whatever we wished in order to receive whatever pay and aid we were willing to provide.  I think that fits the definition of a mercenary rather than an ally. 

Ever wonder how much he personally tucked away before he resigned?

K

(in reply to meatcleaver)
Profile   Post #: 22
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 5:14:25 AM   
Paulnz


Posts: 411
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


Pakistan might not be another Great Britain, but they have certainly assisted us in the war against terrorists.

Do we have a problem with them, in that they do have a problem with the "bandit area" on their border? Yep.

But, Obama's plan may well turn a reluctant ally into a party to a live fire war - and they have nukes.




Pakistan has 169 million people and impossible terrain. McCain seems to understand this. Obama is downright dangerous and if elected President one would hope his advisers will rein him in or the result could be disastrous.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 23
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 5:44:47 AM   
xXLithiumXx


Posts: 723
Joined: 9/2/2008
From: Hell, Kentucky
Status: offline
 I am watching the debate this morning, granted its in 7 minute long incriments on youtube but, watching it I am.

When it comes to Pakistan, since that is the OP this morning, plausible deniablity be damned. The fact is, Bin Ladin is out there, everyone knows that he is, getting him may bring justice to 9/11, but in the long run, we have spent the last 7 almost 8 years over there raiding, raping, interrogating, reforming, and forcing a people that doesnt want anything to do with us, so that,  even if we got Bin Ladin, some one over there is going to be pissed off enough to see that maybe ole Bin Ladin had a point. Americans are tyrants, and we need another flaming plane up the ass because we didnt get it the first time. So....get BinLadin...thats awesome. But will it take us another 8 years and depression to get the next guy? Because we may not be able to bounce back from this one, let alone another one.

_____________________________

If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?

Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement


You have to believe in yourself. -Tsun Tzu-

Resident Malkavian.

(in reply to Paulnz)
Profile   Post #: 24
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 5:53:49 AM   
SilverMark


Posts: 3457
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline
It amazes me that an attack in a ungoverned area of a country harboring terrorists brings such a diatribe of rebuke yet, attacking Iraq and everyone knowing when we would is somehow different and was supported? If we can pin point Bin Laden and the Pakistani's aren't able or willing to take him out We Will.
Nothing was said about an invasion or military conflict with the Government of Pakistan. Go ahead....shoot the Bastard PLEASE!
The Pakistani's will issue statements as to their anger and then go right back to planning the annihilation of India. If anyone is President and they have the opportunity and don't seize it, they should be run out of the White house!

(in reply to xXLithiumXx)
Profile   Post #: 25
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 5:57:54 AM   
rulemylife


Posts: 14614
Joined: 8/23/2004
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY




Pakistan might not be another Great Britain, but they have certainly assisted us in the war against terrorists.

Do we have a problem with them, in that they do have a problem with the "bandit area" on their border? Yep.

But, Obama's plan may well turn a reluctant ally into a party to a live fire war - and they have nukes.

Yet ... he's willing to sit down with the president of Iran, and the dictator of N. Korea "without precondition"?

There is something basically skewed with this thinking, and I'm not simply trying to "make points" on Obama.

Firm


Isn't what Obama suggested exactly what Bush is already doing in a last-ditch effort to save face on his promise to get Bin-Laden?

U.S. Takes Heat Over Pakistan Border Raids, Pakistan Army Chief ...
Pakitan's military chief lashed out at the United States over cross-border raids
by American troops from Afghanistan and said his country's sovereignty will ...

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2008/09/10/terror/main4437559.shtml?source=RSSattr=World_4437559
President Bush Secretly Oks Border Raids Into Pakistan | NewsHour ...


Sep 12, 2008 ... NewsHour Teacher Center, Video Blog, President Bush Secretly Oks Border Raids
Into Pakistan.
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/video/blog/2008/09/president_bush_secretly_oks_bo.html
The New York Times reported Thursday that President Bush two months ago secretly approved orders for cross border raids from Afghanistan into Pakistan without prior permission from the Pakistani government.
While the US has carried out airstrikes in the region for months this is a break in strategy as it puts US military troops and CIA personal on the ground in an allied country without permission. While the US military insists the raids are part of a greater Afghanistan strategy, the army chief and newly elected government of Pakistan have roundly denounced the raids.


And what Miss Congeniality got publicly spanked by McCain for saying she supported?

Political Radar: Palin Supports Cross-Border Pakistan Raids
Sep 28, 2008 ... Sarah Palin endorsed cross-border raids by U.S. troops into Pakistan to prevent
terrorists from crossing the border into Afghanistan. ...
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalradar/2008/09/palin-supports.html
 

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 26
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 6:05:46 AM   
xXLithiumXx


Posts: 723
Joined: 9/2/2008
From: Hell, Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

It amazes me that an attack in a ungoverned area of a country harboring terrorists brings such a diatribe of rebuke yet, attacking Iraq and everyone knowing when we would is somehow different and was supported? If we can pin point Bin Laden and the Pakistani's aren't able or willing to take him out We Will.
Nothing was said about an invasion or military conflict with the Government of Pakistan. Go ahead....shoot the Bastard PLEASE!
The Pakistani's will issue statements as to their anger and then go right back to planning the annihilation of India. If anyone is President and they have the opportunity and don't seize it, they should be run out of the White house!


Im not rebuking. If we can get him, sure get him. Im just saying, dont expect that he will be the last one. Weve been over there ass fucking those people for 8 years...some one else is bound to be just as pissed off as Bin Ladin is.

_____________________________

If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?

Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement


You have to believe in yourself. -Tsun Tzu-

Resident Malkavian.

(in reply to SilverMark)
Profile   Post #: 27
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 7:00:09 AM   
cloudboy


Posts: 7306
Joined: 12/14/2005
Status: offline

The endless US Presidential election, lasting 10 months or so, cannot help but devolve into a circus.

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 28
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 7:43:40 AM   
Musicmystery


Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY

They are talking about Obama's plan to invade Pakistan if necessary.

It occurred to me, while I was listening, how turned around things seem to get sometimes ...

McCain is willing to sit down and talk with our allies ... and is willing to attack our enemies.

Obama is willing to sit down and talk with our enemies ... and is willing to attack our allies.

Strange.

Firm


A number of commentators have noted that McCain and Obama are not far apart policy-wise. After all, they seek to led the same nation with the same problems and the same political realities.

The partisanship--as apart on this forum as anywhere else--sweeps that aside in the interests of finding attack angles. Those partisan attacks, unfortunately, can so cloud the issues that careful analysis to parse the differences becomes difficult.

And for many people, those difference don't matter---they've already decided what they think.



(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 29
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 8:59:22 AM   
subtee


Posts: 5133
Joined: 7/26/2007
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: BitaTruble

~FR~

Obama's actual comment was if Bin Ladin was in our sights and Pakistan either could not or would not go after him, then we would. He never used the word invade. Tom Brokaw used it .. maybe that's where the confusion lies. The only definition of invade that I could find which would fit the OP was 'to move into' since there is no conquest or pillage/plunder involved in going after Bin Laden as far as Pakistan is concerned. 

As far as I can tell, Obama doesn't want to move into Pakistan. He just wants to visit, get Bin Laden then get out. And why on Earth would we be allies with a country that harbors terrorists? That's a direct violation of the Patriot Act passed by both houses and signed into law by our President. And did not our esteemed president declare we would go after the evil doers no matter where on Earth they might hide? Remember 'if you're not with us, you're against us? I thought Bush did an excellent job in the early days after 9/11. Now it's time to finish what we started, get that son-of-a-bitch and be done with it.

Don't get me wrong .. I think diplomacy should be tried with Pakistan and I believe that Obama thinks that as well ... and maybe some new blood in the WH, whether that's McCain or Obama will enable some talks that will lead to a joint venture in capturing the bastard, but if not .. then we have every right (in fact I consider it a responsibility to ensure the safety of future generations) as a sovereign nation, to hunt down and capture or kill the terrorists who are responsible for the destruction and death of 9/11.

~Don't fuck with a menopausal sadist from Texas who owns guns~



This is exactly correct and what Obama iterated and reiterated. To claim to not understand the difference between attacking a country and attacking terrorists is intentional obfuscation or dimness.

_____________________________

Don't believe everything you think...

(in reply to BitaTruble)
Profile   Post #: 30
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 9:23:51 AM   
SilverMark


Posts: 3457
Joined: 5/9/2007
Status: offline
I don't disagree with you...this sight attributes a reply to things I post based on who's post preceeds mine.
You are correct, there will be many in line for us to shoot Bin Laden is the face of the movment for now I hope
it dosen't take 8 years to get the next one! Just shoot Bin Laden first!

(in reply to xXLithiumXx)
Profile   Post #: 31
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 10:25:38 AM   
magicone


Posts: 53
Joined: 10/28/2006
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: FirmhandKY


quote:

ORIGINAL: MzMia

quote:

ORIGINAL: slvemike4u

Plausible deniability?...Really Firm,you would want to deny ,and or keep secret, getting Bin Laden.If I had my druthers his body would go on tour and every American who wanted would get a chance to view his rotting corpse.


I recall about 7 years ago a little incident called "9/11".
Who was the mastermind behind 9/11?
Was his name Bin Laden?

Where is Bin Laden these days Firm?
Is he in Iraq?
Do we even care about Bin Laden any more?

I also recall the tactics that led up to our soon to be 8 years long war in Iraq.
mike? Do you recall President Bush sitting down to negotiate prior to bombing Iraq?
Why am I thinking another case of:  pot, kettle, black here?

Hummm, was our President willing to sit and wait and chat with our "friends" in
the UN, prior to going to Iraq?
Or do we have "friends" in the UN?


Can someone explain the negotiations that took place prior to our going over to Iraq?
I mean how long did President Bush sit down and talk prior to going, Firm?


Bush went to the UN, and engaged the UN several times before the Iraq war.

How soon we forget. Especially when it is convenient.

Firm


and as far as i know the UN didnt agree so far, beside the UN didnt gave blessing...
and please - before i get offended about my statement....
as long as i know the states, Mr Bush had an agreement with Osama Bin Laden as Russia was strong - the cold War still did exist... , states felt threatende about the power of russia... and hey Osama did got a lot of money for....come on thats politic.
to me as an habitant of europe and observing all that... i do have much more a problem with that the States take a position for themself like "we are the world"... and nothing else does exist.
and hey... i am not talking about anyone in special....
i am more than glad if there is any person so far in all that searching of power, able to see himself not as the centre of the world and to free his mind.. so may some solutions could be found...
but hey this are just my two cents....

(in reply to FirmhandKY)
Profile   Post #: 32
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 10:53:08 AM   
bipolarber


Posts: 2792
Joined: 9/25/2004
Status: offline
Here's the thing: Earlier in the campaign, and then again last night, McCain claimed, "I know how to get OBL, my friends... I know absolutely where he is, and how to get him. IF I am elected President, I will capture him, and I will kill him."

Okay... so, if McCain is sitting on this information, if he HAS knowledge about where OBL is, and how to defeat him... Why hasn't he done it already?! Isn't he required by his sense of duty as an American citizen, and a Senator of the US, and a former member of the military, to divulge this information? Is this some kind of blackmail attempt by McCain? If we don't deliver the goods, (bring it to the West bridge at midnight, and we'll swap) ...he'll just let OBL continue to stay free and plot further attacks against the USA? If this is true, is this what you would term "patriotic" behavior?

(in reply to magicone)
Profile   Post #: 33
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 11:41:11 AM   
cjan


Posts: 3513
Joined: 2/21/2008
Status: offline
I'm not sure where to post this, so I thought I'd try here. I found this e-mail in my inbox from the Queen of England this morning. I'm not sure if it is a hoax or not since I haven't been able to stand watching the news for the last coupla weeks and have been sticking to the cartoon channel. Here is the text of the message, it looks official and came with a nice pic of the Queen, but I know it is against the rules to post pics here so I left it out.
quote:


To the citizens of the United States of America from Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II In light of your failure in recent years to nominate competent candidates for President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective immediately. (You should look up 'revocation' in the Oxford English Dictionary.) Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths, and territories (except Kansas, which she does not fancy). Your new Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, will appoint a Governor for America without the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire may be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect: ----------------------- 1. The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'colour,' 'favour,' 'labour' and 'neighbour.' Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters, and the suffix '-ize' will be replaced by the suffix '-ise.' Generally, you will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. (look up 'vocabulary'). ------------------------ 2. Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with filler noises such as ''like' and 'you know' is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as U.S. English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take into account the reinstated let ter 'u'' and the elimination of '-ize.' ------------------- 3. July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday. ----------------- 4. You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers, or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you're not quite ready to be independent. Guns should only be used for shooting grouse. If you can't sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist,then you're not ready to shoot grouse. ---------------------- 5. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler. Although a permit will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public. ---------------------- 6. All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you will start driving on the left side with immediate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables. Both roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour. -------------------- 7. The former USA will adopt UK prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) of roughly $10/US gallon. Get used to it. ------------------- 8. You will learn to make real chips. Those things you callFrench fries are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut, fried in animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar. ------------------- 9. The cold, tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all. Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager. South African beer is also acceptable, as they are pound for pound the greatest sporting nation on earth and it can only be due to the beer. They are also part of the British Commonwealth - see what it did for them. American brands will be referred to as Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of further confusion. --------------------- 10. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good guys. Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play English characters. Watching Andie Macdowell attempt English dialogue in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's ears removed with a cheese grater. --------------------- 11. You will cease playing American football. There is only one kind of proper football; you call it soccer. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which has some similarities to American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of nancies). --------------------- 12. Further, you will stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which is not played outside of America. Since only 2.1% of you are aware there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable. You will learn cricket, and we will let you face the South Africans first to take the sting out of their deliveries. -------------------- 13. You must tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us mad. ----------------- 14. An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all monies due (backdated to 1776). --------------- 15. Daily Tea Time begins promptly at 4 p.m. with proper cups, with saucers, and never mugs, with high quality biscuits (cookies) and cakes; plus strawberries (with cream) when in season. God Save the Queen!


_____________________________

"I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A bird will fall ,frozen , dead, from a bough without ever having felt sorry for itself."- D.H. L

" When you look into the abyss, the abyss also looks in to you"- Frank Nitti



(in reply to bipolarber)
Profile   Post #: 34
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 11:52:41 AM   
kittinSol


Posts: 16926
Status: offline
Yay, our time has come back  .

_____________________________



(in reply to cjan)
Profile   Post #: 35
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 2:27:42 PM   
LaTigresse


Posts: 26123
Joined: 1/15/2006
Status: offline
That was delightful!

God save the Queen!


_____________________________

My twisted, self deprecating, sense of humour, finds alot to laugh about, in your lack of one!

Just because you are well educated, articulate, and can use big, fancy words, properly........does not mean you are right!

(in reply to kittinSol)
Profile   Post #: 36
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 2:34:21 PM   
lronitulstahp


Posts: 5392
Joined: 10/17/2007
Status: offline
quote:

God save the Queen!
Apparently that prayer has been answered...Herself and the Queen Mum being not allowed to die it would seem.
(Should either fall off tomorrow....please know i had NOTHING to do with it)

~slut is not amused

_____________________________

Truth is, everybody is going to hurt you; you just gotta find the ones worth suffering for." -Bob Marley

(in reply to LaTigresse)
Profile   Post #: 37
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 2:52:43 PM   
xXLithiumXx


Posts: 723
Joined: 9/2/2008
From: Hell, Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: SilverMark

I don't disagree with you...this sight attributes a reply to things I post based on who's post preceeds mine.
You are correct, there will be many in line for us to shoot Bin Laden is the face of the movment for now I hope
it dosen't take 8 years to get the next one! Just shoot Bin Laden first!


That it does...

I generally try to quote who I am replying to, just so it is clear to whom I speak.

And again, I agree. Shoot the fucker, but dont waste 8 years and how many billions doing so.

_____________________________

If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?

Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement


You have to believe in yourself. -Tsun Tzu-

Resident Malkavian.

(in reply to SilverMark)
Profile   Post #: 38
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 2:55:01 PM   
xXLithiumXx


Posts: 723
Joined: 9/2/2008
From: Hell, Kentucky
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: cjan

I'm not sure where to post this, so I thought I'd try here. I found this e-mail in my inbox from the Queen of England this morning. I'm not sure if it is a hoax or not since I haven't been able to stand watching the news for the last coupla weeks and have been sticking to the cartoon channel. Here is the text of the message, it looks official and came with a nice pic of the Queen, but I know it is against the rules to post pics here so I left it out.
quote:


To the citizens of the United States of America from Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II In light of your failure in recent years to nominate competent candidates for President of the USA and thus to govern yourselves, we hereby give notice of the revocation of your independence, effective immediately. (You should look up 'revocation' in the Oxford English Dictionary.) Her Sovereign Majesty Queen Elizabeth II will resume monarchical duties over all states, commonwealths, and territories (except Kansas, which she does not fancy). Your new Prime Minister, Gordon Brown, will appoint a Governor for America without the need for further elections. Congress and the Senate will be disbanded. A questionnaire may be circulated next year to determine whether any of you noticed. To aid in the transition to a British Crown dependency, the following rules are introduced with immediate effect: ----------------------- 1. The letter 'U' will be reinstated in words such as 'colour,' 'favour,' 'labour' and 'neighbour.' Likewise, you will learn to spell 'doughnut' without skipping half the letters, and the suffix '-ize' will be replaced by the suffix '-ise.' Generally, you will be expected to raise your vocabulary to acceptable levels. (look up 'vocabulary'). ------------------------ 2. Using the same twenty-seven words interspersed with filler noises such as ''like' and 'you know' is an unacceptable and inefficient form of communication. There is no such thing as U.S. English. We will let Microsoft know on your behalf. The Microsoft spell-checker will be adjusted to take into account the reinstated let ter 'u'' and the elimination of '-ize.' ------------------- 3. July 4th will no longer be celebrated as a holiday. ----------------- 4. You will learn to resolve personal issues without using guns, lawyers, or therapists. The fact that you need so many lawyers and therapists shows that you're not quite ready to be independent. Guns should only be used for shooting grouse. If you can't sort things out without suing someone or speaking to a therapist,then you're not ready to shoot grouse. ---------------------- 5. Therefore, you will no longer be allowed to own or carry anything more dangerous than a vegetable peeler. Although a permit will be required if you wish to carry a vegetable peeler in public. ---------------------- 6. All intersections will be replaced with roundabouts, and you will start driving on the left side with immediate effect. At the same time, you will go metric with immediate effect and without the benefit of conversion tables. Both roundabouts and metrication will help you understand the British sense of humour. -------------------- 7. The former USA will adopt UK prices on petrol (which you have been calling gasoline) of roughly $10/US gallon. Get used to it. ------------------- 8. You will learn to make real chips. Those things you callFrench fries are not real chips, and those things you insist on calling potato chips are properly called crisps. Real chips are thick cut, fried in animal fat, and dressed not with catsup but with vinegar. ------------------- 9. The cold, tasteless stuff you insist on calling beer is not actually beer at all. Henceforth, only proper British Bitter will be referred to as beer, and European brews of known and accepted provenance will be referred to as Lager. South African beer is also acceptable, as they are pound for pound the greatest sporting nation on earth and it can only be due to the beer. They are also part of the British Commonwealth - see what it did for them. American brands will be referred to as Near-Frozen Gnat's Urine, so that all can be sold without risk of further confusion. --------------------- 10. Hollywood will be required occasionally to cast English actors as good guys. Hollywood will also be required to cast English actors to play English characters. Watching Andie Macdowell attempt English dialogue in Four Weddings and a Funeral was an experience akin to having one's ears removed with a cheese grater. --------------------- 11. You will cease playing American football. There is only one kind of proper football; you call it soccer. Those of you brave enough will, in time, be allowed to play rugby (which has some similarities to American football, but does not involve stopping for a rest every twenty seconds or wearing full kevlar body armour like a bunch of nancies). --------------------- 12. Further, you will stop playing baseball. It is not reasonable to host an event called the World Series for a game which is not played outside of America. Since only 2.1% of you are aware there is a world beyond your borders, your error is understandable. You will learn cricket, and we will let you face the South Africans first to take the sting out of their deliveries. -------------------- 13. You must tell us who killed JFK. It's been driving us mad. ----------------- 14. An internal revenue agent (i.e. tax collector) from Her Majesty's Government will be with you shortly to ensure the acquisition of all monies due (backdated to 1776). --------------- 15. Daily Tea Time begins promptly at 4 p.m. with proper cups, with saucers, and never mugs, with high quality biscuits (cookies) and cakes; plus strawberries (with cream) when in season. God Save the Queen!



Its a hoax or it would have mentioned that Britis punk and pop music will be accepted and all defilers of said sound will be killed.

If not it should have been.

_____________________________

If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her friends?

Ideas don't stay in some minds very long because they don't like solitary confinement


You have to believe in yourself. -Tsun Tzu-

Resident Malkavian.

(in reply to cjan)
Profile   Post #: 39
RE: Watching the Debate ... - 10/8/2008 4:00:08 PM   
philosophy


Posts: 5284
Joined: 2/15/2004
Status: offline
....apparently the original was written by John Cleese......

(in reply to xXLithiumXx)
Profile   Post #: 40
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid >> RE: Watching the Debate ... Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.109