gypsygrl -> RE: Nature Vrs Nuture... Does it Matter? (10/9/2008 2:12:55 PM)
|
Historically, when a question of human bahavior is debated in terms of nature vs. nurture, there have been specific policy orientations associated with each answer. If something is considered, based on the available evidence, to be natural, generally people are more accepting of the phenomena and less likely to try to interfere with it. If something is considered to be the product of nuture its given way to an emphasis on parenting styles as a way of modifying, altering, eliminating or encouraging the behavior. In years past, like the 19th century, social problems we currently understand to be substantially influenced by culture/nuture were taken to be biologically determined; things like crime, developmental disability and impoverishment. The most common policy responses involved incarceration/institutionalization and containment and attempts to develop positive policies were in the minority until the middle of the 20th century when thinking about these matters changed. Because our thinking on these matters have changed in favor of nurture, we now tend to favor educational solutions (I'm not talking about indivuals, but social policy) Ok, so yeah, as a cultural historian, I have an interest in nurture/nature debates and feel they matter. :) But when it comes down to understanding my own way of being in the world, my adult sexuality has already been formed--whether its been formed by nature or nurture is irrelevant to my sexual practice. The same goes for my personality: its largely a done deal regardless of how it got that way.
|
|
|
|