RE: No Response is a Response?

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Polls and Other Random Stupidity

[Poll]

No Response is a Response?

Rude.

19% (17)

Accepted Etiquette.

51% (44)

Both.

29% (25)

Total Votes : 86

(last vote on : 10/22/2008 1:33:54 PM)
(Poll ended: 10/31/2008 12:00:00 AM)

Message

Kalista07 -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:00:45 PM)
nods, shakes, convulses uhmmm...Yes, Red...That'd be a big, fat, slutty, sloppy, wet YES!!! Missed You too...We've been spending quality time together today Kali (who's pretty convinced He is going to be sorry that He taught me how to play WOW today)

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:06:44 PM)
hehehe.... OK so, that's two votes for "yes, I'd reply to smut mail from a known redhead." Got it! must think of something perverted to send [sm=writing.gif] I'm glad the two of you got to spend a nice day together, Kali. That's really awesome. Linea, I'm glad your sister was awesome when you talked to her.

beargonewild -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:09:38 PM)
snort Should be very easy for you Red!

Kalista07 -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:13:02 PM)
i is going to bed all....nighty night. Kali

MadAxeman -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:16:56 PM)
*I'd like some of that there thing*

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:27:17 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: beargonewild snort Should be very easy for you Red! Bear, the words "easy" and "Red" should never be in the same sentence. tries to hold straight face [8\|] face errupts in laughter [:D] quote: ORIGINAL: MadAxeman *I'd like some of that there thing* Oh dear... I've turned into the Pied Piper of wank fodder. [:o]

MadAxeman -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:32:20 PM)
*Forget the pie, fodder will suffice* *And that makes me a....rat?*

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:38:52 PM)
Shall I call you Templeton? Signed, Charlotte [;)]

MadAxeman -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:45:00 PM)
*See that?* *Your comment sailing over my head there.*

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:47:54 PM)
Poor Axey. there, there The book by E.B. White, called "Charlotte's Web" had a lovely rat named Templeton in it. [:)] eta Wiki reference: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlottes_Web and YouTube: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pe880aDOw8g&NR=1

MadAxeman -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:52:05 PM)
*Don't do that, I am palatable not patable* *Charlotte Templeton is a rat that did something nasty to you?*

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:55:52 PM)
Actually, my family had a pet rat before I was born named Herman. Turned out he was a girl. [8\|] Poor rat. (see the links I posted... there may be a test tomorrow... I'm off to bed now) Huggles, all. [;)]

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 9:58:45 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: MadAxeman *Don't do that, I am palatable not patable* What type of garnish do we serve with roasted rat?

MadAxeman -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/12/2008 10:09:11 PM)
*Black pepper, I also like it on strawberries, try it.*

cravesdom -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/13/2008 1:09:14 AM)
I don't think it is necessarily rude not to respond and there was a time when I first signed up with CM that I couldn't physically respond to every single email I got. I do think if the email is polite and some thought and time obviously went into it, it is not too hard to write back a simple "thank you but no thank you" response.

Icarys -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/13/2008 6:52:22 AM)
quote: ORIGINAL: HandSolo quote: ORIGINAL: Icarys Was the "both" meant to pull the independent vote out of the equation?[:D] Well, no, I thought it fairer to allow for the fact I may have worded the poll based on my bias. I also think it is a valid position: that the Internet is an inherently rude place. I voted "Both" so I can view the results without skewing them. Edit: Apparently, I can remove options, so if you think it's clouding the issue, I'll delete "Both." Honestly I think it may have being that so many have taken both..if the only options were one or the other what might it look like..then again "both" is a choice..still would've been interesting to see.

HandSolo -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/13/2008 8:00:02 AM)
You can have all of the "Both" votes, it'd be 2:3 in favor of "Accepted Etiquette." I think we both know that would not be the result of a two-way poll. Even a 50/50 split of the waffle vote would be a landslide, approximately the 3:1 that I observe on any thread on the topic. Edit: I have an idea. Stay tuned.

Daddysredhead -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/13/2008 1:27:09 PM)
thinks HandSolo fried his brain whilst coming up with another idea [:o] oh no!

dcnovice -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/13/2008 1:44:34 PM)
I voted both. In many cases, I'm told, intro e-mails are one-liners or form letters. I see those as the CM equivalent of spam and think one can delete them without qualm. I've done so myself. On the other hand, I'd lean toward answering (even with a "No thanks") a note that was clearly written for me and which showed evidence of having read my profile.

HandSolo -> RE: No Response is a Response? (10/13/2008 2:32:42 PM)
quote: ORIGINAL: Daddysredhead thinks HandSolo fried his brain whilst coming up with another idea [:o] oh no! I fried long ago. The Cunning Plan is in action, but I forgot one important detail, which I'll reveal once TCP matures.

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 next > >>

4.614258E-02