RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


kdsub -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:03:08 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Shoot, KD: without googling, how do you define socialism?


Too late...lol I already googled before I commented in the thread...I've learned my lessons well.

Butch




stella41b -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:04:38 AM)


quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

We have already turned thr corner. If Obama does get elected we will be there. When the working middle class starts having their wages taxed to be doled out to those not working we will indeed be there. 40% of residents pay NO federal taxes now. It will get much worse.


But does this not include the same working middle class who have borrowed thousands to 'own' their homes (but don't yet own them because they haven't yet paid for them in full) 'purchase' their car (which also they don't own even though they're making the repayments) and 'spending' their own earnings (which doesn't become their earnings until they've paid the credit card bills)?

Some great purchasing power you have there.




MrRodgers -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:05:16 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: servantforuse

We have already turned thr corner. If Obama does get elected we will be there. When the working middle class starts having their wages taxed to be doled out to those not working we will indeed be there. 40% of residents pay NO federal taxes now. It will get much worse.

Yea, me too, I am really afraid of Obama. Obama may double my national debt, may double the price of gas and my health insurance premiums, he may cause the loss 2 million more jobs in the next 8 years, he may see family median income reduced another $2,500 a year, he may get us into two more $trillion wars and cut taxes for the rich, Obama will then go to congress and FORCE us to to borrow another $700 billion to bailout the real socialists...wall street which are in fact nothing more than the greediest of capitalist scum.

Imagine that. Oh yes, the 'working class' will be taxed alright our children's working class and it won't be for any socialism for us but...for them...the investor class. Your kids will be taxed to make the capitalist the paper-traders whole again as we can't have them go down so far...they have to go out and get a real job.

I still cannot believe I read either such ignorance or call it what you like...I like unmitigated bullshit. Why is it that as reflected on these boards that nobody wants to look at the history of capitalism ? We have HAD socialism in this country...for the rich and capitalism...for the poor. This socialism has now cost and will cost us oh about $6-7 trillion dollars and not for 'social' purposes but to bailout millionaires.

I guess soon now...we'll ALL be rich enough for a little of this socialism.

How's this for news ?? Not only to we pay for $400,000 parties and $85,000 hunting junkets for AIG exects but the banks us taxpayers have been forced to provide a $250 billion line of credit or to buy their shit paper...yes THOSE banks, have already budgeted $70 BILLION in DISCRETIONARY year-end BONUSES in 2008. Now that's my kind of socialism.

Get a grip people. Read this writing on the wall in BOLD letters. We and our kids and their kids and theirs...will now for a 1/2 a century be victims of the new vanilla slavery...to debt.

Kinkroids...capitalism IS moral hazard...capitalism IS IMMORAL prima facie. How many more of these do we need to get the message ? Hpow much more capitalist propaganda will the masses continue to believe ? Capitalism is buying and selling things among them...paper. They borrow to leverage of moutain of profits on their speculations and when it blows up in their face...WE pay for it.




philosophy -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:06:10 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

We  as a country are not socialists... have never been ...are not moving towards or away from socialism. To meet that definition we would have to be a dictatorship and own or desire to own..not just control... all industry, goods, services, and distribution.


.......well, that's true as long as the US has a definition of socialist that isn't in any dictionary and that no-one else in the world shares. What you're describing is totalitarianism, not socialism per se. Totalitarianism happens under both extreme left and extreme right wing governments. You've clearly bought into the propaganda.........


Nope... I'll be happy for you to list the definition of socialism...we don't meet it...not even close.

Butch


.........ok, except there isn't one definition of socialism. However, as a proponent of the free market perhaps you'd like this definition....
"Some socialists propose various decentralized, worker-managed economic systems. One such system is the "cooperative economy," a largely free market economy in which workers manage the firms and democratically determine remuneration levels and labor divisions. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

....seriously though, read the link. You'll find plenty of things there that aren't in the USA, but you'll also find some that are. You appear to have a visceral idea of what socialism is, the only place that knowledge seems to come from is propaganda.




philosophy -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:08:22 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol

Shoot, KD: without googling, how do you define socialism?


Too late...lol I already googled before I commented in the thread...I've learned my lessons well.

Butch


...really? Perhaps you'd like to share the fruits of that labour.......




kdsub -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:10:21 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

quote:

ORIGINAL: philosophy

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

We  as a country are not socialists... have never been ...are not moving towards or away from socialism. To meet that definition we would have to be a dictatorship and own or desire to own..not just control... all industry, goods, services, and distribution.


.......well, that's true as long as the US has a definition of socialist that isn't in any dictionary and that no-one else in the world shares. What you're describing is totalitarianism, not socialism per se. Totalitarianism happens under both extreme left and extreme right wing governments. You've clearly bought into the propaganda.........


Nope... I'll be happy for you to list the definition of socialism...we don't meet it...not even close.

Butch


.........ok, except there isn't one definition of socialism. However, as a proponent of the free market perhaps you'd like this definition....
"Some socialists propose various decentralized, worker-managed economic systems. One such system is the "cooperative economy," a largely free market economy in which workers manage the firms and democratically determine remuneration levels and labor divisions. "
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Socialism

....seriously though, read the link. You'll find plenty of things there that aren't in the USA, but you'll also find some that are. You appear to have a visceral idea of what socialism is, the only place that knowledge seems to come from is propaganda.


I'm off to get a ct scan...maybe that will divulge why I care at all about this thread...there is one definition...look in a dictionary...not someone’s idea of a definition in an internet thread.

Butch




philosophy -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:11:23 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kdsub

I'm off to get a ct scan...maybe that will divulge why I care at all about this thread...there is one definition...look in a dictionary...not someone’s idea of a definition in an internet thread.

Butch



....good luck with the scan.




Termyn8or -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 11:14:06 AM)

I agree Mus, it just that we should admit it and take kindly to certain types of intervention.

For some unknown reason some assholes can bomb the WTC and turn this into a damnear police state as they take away Citizens' rights. But things that can have a much greater impact on our well being are left in the hands of greedy maniacs who would step on their Mother's throat for a dollar.

The first step is for people to realize that we are not equal, nor the same, and that the qualified are not always placed correctly. If I were CEO of AIG about six tears ago I would have issued a letter stating that we are no longer buying any debt without certain qualifications. Fukum, we are making money anyway.

Carl Tenk, ex boss of my Father (Austrian immigrant). His son was being groomed to run the company and he committed a faux pas. Carl's words to his namesake "Carl, ve are in business to make money, not to LOSE money".

That was a small business though, perhaps grossed five or ten million a year. They had to stand on their own, and Carl, an Austrian immigrant would probably go without food to avoid taking a handout. Where are the people like this ?

I'll tell you where, in unemployment lines and behind the counter at the grocery. This is because the government made it more attractive to outsource to China Inc than to produce anything.

Remember old stereos ? Old pre-Chatsworth Marantz stereo equipment. Highly coveted if you have one that works. They were made here. They cost good money and haven't really depreciated. Yes you can go to eBay and get a Marantz reciever for cheap, but it is a post Chatsworth Marantz. It still had it's merits because of superior design, but is still a foreign product. When you look for a real US made Marantz, forget the checkbook, get a credit card out.

You don't see many model T Fords driving around, but you don't see any Czeckoslovakin Skodas driving around at all. Chrysler imported them in the 1950s. Why ?

I'll tell you something else that you might find hard to believe, but some simple research can bear out the facts. And what exact point this proves, I will leave up to you.

In the days of slavery, there were plenty of US Citizens willing to work. They were starving or just barely eeking out an existence. There were no jobs for them, but there were. When you hire a Man for a job, you pay him and so what, everything is fine. People would travel for good jobs just as they do now. Some say the White Man did not want to pick cotton, but the fact is they would have done anything to feed themselves and their families.

Overall, it was cheaper just to hire people rather than to hire slaves, but someone sold them on the idea. When you hire a Man, if he gets sick he does not come to work and therefore does not get paid. If you own a slave you must pay for the medicine or whatever or lose your investment. Not to mention that you have to beat some of them half to death to get them to answer to "Toby" instead of "Kunta Kinte". You always had the possibility of runaways, and there was just about a plethora of problems associated with owning slaves.

Just like now, they are sold on the idea of having everything made in China. They make more money now, but in the long run it is a bad idea. Technically it is the same thing.

Slavery was brought to our shores by people who could sell that quick buck, and I also believe they had an ulterior, more sinister motive in mind. Other than making money, there is more.

When people are enslaved they are uneducated. The uneducated are easier to manipulte and control. The slave traders were operating internationally and saw it as an opportunity to get ahead while making money. In that they were pioneers in social development.

In any civilized country they knew that slavery would eventually be abolished, and folks, the US was not the first place this has happened. As the ruling class practices eugenics, they delight in the fact that we miscenigate (sp) and overall, with their money we are easier to buy.

In essence, all the companies that make your toys are slavers, it has just become more sophisticated. We don't need the Chinese grunt here, just put the factory over there. Then we can pollute their land and do pretty much what we want. There is not much difference.

How different is it really ? Now the American worker has discovered that here, good performance is not rewarded, in fact sometimes quite the opposite. What did you expect people to do ? They actually responded in a logical way. If I can make the same money as the next guy and produce less, why shouldn't I ?

These factors all combined are what got us into this mess, and when the idea became making money off of money, of course people jumped at it. Do you blame them ? Hard work doesn't pay off, being smart and honest doesn't pay off, loyalty defies the laws of gravity because when it goes up it does not come back down, so what are they suposed to do ?

They speak of American laziness and glut, but when you stop rewarding achievers and denying those rewards to those who are not, what conclusion can be drawn ? The only conclusion is that achievement does not pay, so why waste the time on it ?

You see, these problems are very deep rooted in society, and that makes them very hard to solve. Of course people didn't say no. But why was the question asked ?

These problems are also deep rooted in our own mind. I say I am the top earner where I work, and I don't know anyone who doesn't think the same of themselves. They say "I did twice as much work as the other guy", but then you talk to the other guy and find out it was a bunch of crap. That is our mentality ?

I AM the top earner at our shop because I work on things that cost five grand, not five hundred. I got numbers, but again and again people tell me they are the best employee the company ever had, which is simply not true. They might see it that way, but that doesn't make it true.

But that was spawned by so many bad decisions it is not funny. People came to this attitude because success was not properly rewarded and failure was not properly punished. Over decades they learned that it's not what you know but who you know. Idiots promoted ahead of competent people, relatives getting into the board of directors when the guy who really makes the company work is given a three percent raise. How would you respond to a situation like that ? And after years of subjugating them to this type of system we now wonder why the American worker is not as productive as he could be.

Give me a break, what did you expect ?

And now, we are pretty much lame. We might build a car, but it has many foreign coponents.We can't build a TV or an ipod, or it seems almost anything else, except paper clips. The strawbosses over in China will not attack the paperclip industry because paper is becoming a thing of the past.

China, a slave nation pretty much eh ? Lots of cars on the roads there, lots of TVs and toys in those huts or houses or whatever those primatives live in.

One thing though, a few years ago the head of China's equivalent of the FDA took a bribe and allowed a drug on the market, about a half a dozen people died from it. They executed him. In the US he would have been promoted. Got to keep those slaves in good shape, now that we produce nothing just about, where is their incentive to protect us ? Because they certainly don't and that is why I have a gun.

Get it through your head, it is us and them. If you think you are them because you make a million a year, think again, you are dogmeat. You are nothing. That is how the world works. Get used to it.

In other aspects, keep yourself alive because I think what happens next is going to be quite interesting.

T




Steponme73 -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 3:00:23 PM)

We are so close to socalism now you can smell it in the air!  Elect Obama and we will have arrived!!!  There will be less people paying taxes, more government and those who don't want to amount to anything will be taken care of forever.  That is the socalist way!!!  SPREAD THE WEALTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




kdsub -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 3:33:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Steponme73

We are so close to socalism now you can smell it in the air!  Elect Obama and we will have arrived!!!  There will be less people paying taxes, more government and those who don't want to amount to anything will be taken care of forever.  That is the socalist way!!!  SPREAD THE WEALTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


I just want to thank you in advance for your donation to my meager wealth… I will think of you as I down my beer and snort my cocaine with the extra cash.

Butch




rulemylife -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 4:23:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: kittinSol


Coming from socialistic Europe, where things like education, healthcare and transport function pretty well all in all, I have no fear of government holding the reins of crucial public services. It doesn't surprise me that some people are terrified of the word over here, in America, but I still wish they'd try it just for a few months before cussing it [8D] - it's like they're indoctrinated into hating 'socialism' so much that they think any system that diverges from the strict capitalistic free-market hold 'em all poker is socialism. When it isn't.


It's not just "like" that, it's reality.  It's reinforced in textbooks, in the media, and, of course, if you don't raise your glass and chant USA, USA when someone says we're the greatest country in the world then you're a traitor.

Of course, if you ask someone why socialism is bad, in what ways the U.S. is the greatest, or if they know anything about any other country you will get a blank stare 90% of the time.




rulemylife -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 4:30:49 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Steponme73

We are so close to socalism now you can smell it in the air!  Elect Obama and we will have arrived!!!  There will be less people paying taxes, more government and those who don't want to amount to anything will be taken care of forever.  That is the socalist way!!!  SPREAD THE WEALTH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!


Care to document any of those statements, especially the statement that there will be less people paying taxes?




pahunkboy -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 4:39:41 PM)

We tried your guy, bush.   We even gave him 8 years.  now look at what you have done.

Obama wont be any worse then bush. 

We let the multinational corps rule us long enough.  Just think, in a few short months, Obama will be the king!


The left will call the shots.

The left left bush a good  til.  bush leaves the next, nothing in the til. in fact, 700 bn, and a few trilion GONE from the til.

I hope the uppidy n- gets in. if ony-and-     simply because YOU think he would govern worse then bush.




Termyn8or -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 4:50:00 PM)

People on welfare and disability pay no taxes. Take the jobs away and who do you have left?

T




kdsub -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 4:59:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Termyn8or

People on welfare and disability pay no taxes. Take the jobs away and who do you have left?

T


Is unemployment welfare?...if so you pay taxes on those benefits...why I don't know. As for people on disability...wrong again…  I pay taxes..




kittinSol -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 5:01:35 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: rulemylife
Of course, if you ask someone why socialism is bad, in what ways the U.S. is the greatest, or if they know anything about any other country you will get a blank stare 90% of the time.


So THAT's what it is! They know jack shit about fuck all. I wish they'd just keep on doing the cheerleading jumps and stop trying to pretend they're reasonably informed.




Irishknight -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 5:04:35 PM)

Man... I thought you just hung a left off of mainstreet and you were on Socialist.  I couldn't remember whether it was a street or a boulevard though.  I do remember it running parallel with Marxist and Lennonist.  You guys are making this hard.




kittinSol -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 5:07:28 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Irishknight
You guys are making this hard.


We were trying to make YOU hard [8D] .




pahunkboy -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 5:19:38 PM)

Hey Term, as long as wall street gets paid for reshuffling businesses like Gecko in that movie Greed is Good...  where tycoons make more off of destroying companies then any other way to get paid. then this destruction will flourish.

this type creates nothing. simply reshuffles it  and skims the cream for himself.   even if the entire village is then with out.

Ild trust obamas spreading it around way more then bushes no bid contracts.   NO BID.  think of   padded profit there.

after the past 8 years, NOW people are worried about Obama.   HAAAAAAAA!




LookieNoNookie -> RE: At what point do we turn (socialist) ? (10/20/2008 5:30:47 PM)


Trmn8r....your title is miss-written.

It should read "At what point did we turn (socialist)?"




Page: <<   < prev  1 [2] 3 4   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.1386719