puella
Posts: 2457
Joined: 12/2/2004 Status: offline
|
Normally, I think I would find Sarah Palins latest answer to that question a bit embarrassing, sad and perhaps even humorous in a cringe inducing sort of way.... but with her answer during the debate and in other interviews where she expresses a desire to expand the role of the Vice President , a la Cheney, I find this response more disturbing. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l40nrw3V3GA "...[The Vice President is] in charge of the U.S. Senate so if they want to they can really get in there with the senators and make a lot of good policy changes ..." NO, Sarah, the Vice President is NOT in charge of the Senate, he/she does NOT orchestrate policy changes via the legislative branch, because the Vice President, whether Cheney likes it or not, is NOT a part of the legislative branch. The only thing the VP does with the senate is break a tie. The founding fathers did NOT leave a lot of leeway and flexibility to grant the VP some sort of ruling hand over the senate. It is not the VP's job to "administer the plans" the Executive branch thinks are pressing. There is nothing for you to "tap into with that position". If you do not know what your job description is, are you really ready to assume that role?
_____________________________
We must move forward, not backward, upward, not forward, and always twirling, twirling, twirling towards freedom...... The Simpsons War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." ...Ambrose Bierce "Don't you oppress me!"....Stan/Loretta
|