Elisabella -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 7:36:27 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: CalifChick quote:
ORIGINAL: Elisabella quote:
I'm sorry that nobody, as far as I can see, addressed your OP about removing free will. I did. quote:
There are obviously ways to terminate a pregnancy without legal abortion. Respectfully, I still don't think that's it. It isn't about method or cause or result. I'll go out on a limb and say it isn't even really about abortion. It is about Christians espousing free will, and then not allowing people to have free will, but only allowing them the choices that Christians find morally acceptable. Or hell, I could be entirely wrong. Cali Personally, I think you're wrong. Free will doesn't end with the letter of the law. Free will is what was given to us by God, and IIRC the whole point of free will is to be able to own the consequences, both positive and negative. Rosa Parks used her free will to break the law. So did Jeffrey Dahmer. Outlawing abortion, outlawing ANYTHING, doesn't take away the ABILITY to do it. It just says "if you do this within the borders of this nation you will have to answer to the justice system of this nation." That's it. That's why I brought up the fact that women have aborted babies since the dawn of civilization - and the majority of the time they did so in places where there was no legally sanctioned, doctor provided abortion. If a law was passed saying all doctors who perform abortions will lose their licenses, the doctors would still have the free will to either comply with the law or break it. They would make their choice based on their own morals, and regardless of whether the law calls them on it or not, a Christian would still believe that God would hold them accountable. Confusing the Christian doctrine of free will with secular legal options is a misguided analogy at best.
|
|
|
|