RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


corysub -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 10:13:10 PM)

Someone being in the position of having to make a decision on aborting her child must go through one of the most difficult experiences a human being can endure.  Obviously, some woman could care less and, it seems to me, use abortion instead of the pill.  However, with only one excpetion, I have a daughter and would want her to always have the option of "choice" in the matter being part of the generation that remembers the back room coat hanger atrocites of the past. I never want to go back there.  However, I also believe that those people who don't believe in abortion should have that right not taken from them too in the form of words of stone being thrown at them for their views.  Acceptance, toleration of both points of view should be what we strive for in the country.  There are no winners in this.
The one "exception" I would have to this would be the killing of the baby in the late term pregnacy, unless their was a medical need by the mother.  If a baby should survive an abortion procedure all the medical assistance we would expect for ourselves should be provided.  Call it what you will.. I would call anything less the most horrible act of murder of an innocent.




philosophy -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 10:16:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: CalifChick

So hey, phil, if modern-day Christians were around back during ol' Adam & Eve time, they would have chopped down the apple tree, or encased it in cement, or stood guard 24/7 to make sure no one were to partake of the forbidden fruit, since eating the fruit was not morally acceptable...  thereby removing free will, huh?


Cali



...that's pretty much what i'm driving at Cali......thanks for putting it so succinctly. [:)]




MadAxeman -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 10:24:51 PM)

What Bear said




GreedyTop -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 10:30:12 PM)

~FR~ 

Bear..I love you :)




GreedyTop -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 10:35:42 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella
Well I *do* pay taxes. And while I dislike most forms of socialism, I do support it in cases of children, the elderly, the disabled, and others who are literally incapable of fending for themselves.


This is another point I wanted to address:

Sure you pay taxes.. .how much of what you pay is actually GOING to the above issues??

You realize that in the current administration more spending is going to military spending? including our presence in Iraq/Afghanistan? Where we are KILLING people?  Here's a link, in PIE CHART form.

How about putting your money where your mouth is, and quit telling me what to do with my body?




catize -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 10:47:47 PM)

quote:

 Though I do want to say that the arguement about "well, what if my mother aborted me," or "what if Einsein's mother aborted him?" is a pile of bullshit. "What Ifs" are just that, "what ifs." We can not base anything on a "what if" simply because it is just an assumption. To do otherwise is just self deluding ourselves to believing that we have the ability to control something which is and was beyond our control and prior to our ablility to be self aware. 


Agreed!  It is as silly as "what if they had used birth contol?"
the results would have been the same.




knees2you -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:02:49 PM)

...i've been saving this post for a while.......however, as we now have a poster who characterises abortion as stab stab sucky suck, and calls it feticide i figure it's time.

quote:

Pro-life people are anti-Christian. That's the hypothesis. Let me explain.

Way back in the Garden of Eden, God placed the Tree of Life and the Tree of Knowledge there and told Adam and Eve to leave them alone. Why? Why put them where Adam and Eve could get to them? i mean, God has the whole of creation to play with....so why put them where Adam and Eve can even get close? There's only one possible explanation that jibes with God not being an utter bastard. Free Will.
God doesn't want people to follow because they have no choice. He doesn't want people to worship Him blindly. It has to be a decision. There has to be Free Will.
Now the pro-life position, as it applies to changing legislation, removes choice. Removes the element of free will from the equation. That position seeks to do something that God Himself forebore to do. Remove the element of choice. This is clearly hubris.
Thus, my hypothesis runs, those that seek to change legislation to make abortion illegal are anti-Christian. They have forgotten the first principle.......free will.  philosophy

 
I Believe God was referring to free will as to whether
or not we would Believe in Him?
 
who in your mind is the only one who is allowed to give and take a life?
 
Murder is Murder[sm=beatdeadhorse.gif]
 
Always, knees[sm=cactus.gif]




WyldHrt -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:04:59 PM)

quote:

Please allow me to introduce myself....

*checks out the long undies with lil puppies on 'em*
Got it [;)] 




MAMandSlave -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:15:33 PM)

I have absolutley no problem with Pro life beliefs, but I believe that if one individual wants to stop another from a choice that is thiers by law, then the individual who is trying to stop the abortion, should agree, in a legally binding document, to either adopt the baby upon birth, or to pay for all expenses for that child unil age 18. They also need to be willing to pay for all medical expenses for the mother above and beyond the what the cost of the abortion should be.
That will never happen of course.
As it stands right now, abortion is legal, and the a fetus is a fetus, not a child, so abortion is not legally murder. Each individual has thier right to believe what they want, but legally, it is not murder.




WyldHrt -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:21:06 PM)

CL- When you can tell me firsthand how it feels to be a 16 year old girl, pregnant (despite precautions), physically and emotionally unprepared, and scared out of your mind, then you get to judge. Until then,  realize that what you keep pressing as fact is simply your opinion, and you know what they say about opinions...




GreedyTop -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:22:28 PM)

he wont get it, Wyld ....




WyldHrt -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:25:18 PM)

I know, Greedy, but what I really wanted to say is probably a TOS violation [8D]




GreedyTop -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:28:32 PM)

yeah, I'm proud that I've not said much of what I initially typed..lol




lemmebeYourMine -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:31:10 PM)

Opens the book of Genesis, Opens the books of Mathew, Mark, Luke, and John. Looks at all the pages inbetween Genesis and the First truely Christian of the books. Do not and did not the Jews follow the laws of Moses.  Don't Christians follow a different leader, someone by the name of Jesus Christ?  Now I know, same God, who is never changing. I don't argue that he is or has. I do however want to bring the argument of the OP Back into focus. Why center it around Abortion? Because it's a hot topic.

What the OP seems to be saying is that all laws banning all things that involve a binary set of choices being made are anti-christian? WHAT???  If I follow correctly at least, that is where the OP Could have gone, too bad he was too focused on just one hot topic. I would rather address the tobacco smoking laws being passed in certain states.  Theology is not my strong suit, i am no priest nor other studied theologian. HOWEVER I would say that Most Christians do not prescribe that their focus is on providing all with equal free will. They are not for getting rid of laws against abortion, adultery; flips to the story of Mary Magdalene, Hey didn't she commit adultery and Jesus forgave her: There-by adultery is OK... it must be; if God chose to forgive her. Hmmmmmmmm, sadly no. Christians still judge and have laws against adultery. Rape should not be "out-lawed" and rapists punished under a law because Damn it there goes our Free will given by God's design.

Did not the same God who created free will by placing the tree in Adam and Eve's presence full well knowing what was to come *to whatever degree you feel comfortable with* Also hand down the laws to Moses; and then still end up wiping out a bunch of people who weren't worshipping him, and were creating idols? Didn't he deny many the right to see the promised land after handing down said laws because they were not faithful enough?  Aren't Christians still subscribing to those ten commandments? Don't they talk about the Deadly sins; ones that God finds unforgiveable as seen in the movie "Seven"? And this even though they know Jesus Christ himself came to forgive all who would Believe of their sins.

I think that the biggest thing I want to say is that the OPs thinking is limited to one tiny aspect of Christianity, that I would in no means have categorized as Doctrine.

Did Not Jesus say to render unto Ceasar what is ceasar's;  and unto God what is God's? (regarding taxes I know). Soooooooo, I will cut this short as I am not at all into this argument Pro-choice; Pro-life; it's an old hat and you are one or the other, no one will dissuade any of us from our stands. Therefore abortion aside, laws of the government are apart from Laws of God. Of which laws, Free will was never part of. Yes God created and promoted and desires free will, but he also desires us to follow two simple principals we are seemingly incapable of. "Love they neighbor as thyself" "Love thy God with all your heart, soul, and mind"

Free Will didn't give us the right to ignore everything else God says, nor does it give the government the right to withdraw laws that are in place to protect it's people. Now we may often not agree with those laws, or that they are necessary to serve this purpose; but alot of them including any and all abortion laws are set up to do just that. And whether or not you agree the laws against abortion that are always being debated were proposed to protect an innocent, unborn cell-to-child, zygote-to-infant from undue death. By undue I mean unnatural; forced?; delibrate?; inflicted.  

If you are wondering about Church and state being seperate Here's my opinion; it is SUPPOSED to be, but how many of our Presidents were/are Christians?  So no true seperation has really ever been made I would argue.

and now continue with your thread hijacking as it were.
Lemmebe.




WyldHrt -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:32:54 PM)

*smooch* GMTA.
I'm off to bed, I'll leave the *censored* ones in your capable hands.




hizgeorgiapeach -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/27/2008 11:35:44 PM)

I had originally promised myself that absolutely, positively, under no circumstances, would I reply to this thread.  I managed until now, but simply can't any longer.  I've been fighting the urge to do so for Hours now - and I'm through fighting with myself.
 
Phil - as to your OP - you make a very good point.  Free Will means having the option for ANY of the choices, and then choosing what the individual feels is best for herself (or himself) - not in being told by folks who don't know you, don't live your life, don't have your personal relationship with Diety, your individual experiences and concerns tell you, "hey, I find this particular choice invalid because I consider it morally objectionable, therefore I'm making the choice FOR YOU, so that *I won't be Offended by Your morality.  But just so you feel like you still have some say in the matter - here is an option that I Will approve of as Morally Viable In My Own Eyes, and you can do that.  Good luck, don't ask for my help now that I've made your decision for you."  If nothing else, such an attitude out of Kinksters - folks who are Routinely Judged About Their Sexuality by the "normals" in society - I consider it hypocritical to start getting pissy about a Moral issue while condeming others for getting pissy about YOUR sexual Morality.  (You being Generic in this sense.)
 
As for the Rest of the various comments on the thread.....
 
How many of you have actually had to face the decision making process?  How many of you have been faced with agonizing over what is actually Best for Everyone Who Is Actually Concerned with the situation?  How many of you have sat in the doctor's office, waiting for an appointment, having to face the second thoughts that run rampant?  How many of you have woken up afterwards in both physical and emotional agony, not even knowing that you've been crying nearly hysterically in your drug induced sleep until the nurse asks you if you're through crying?  How many of you have faced hate filled, judgemental, obscenity screaming asshats waiting outside the doctor's office to call you a murderer - while at the same time having no idea of WHY you were there, or what brought you to the decision, and frankly not giving a shit as to the Why so long as you know that they consider you scum because they're screaming it at  you at the top of their lungs six inches from your face?  How many of you have had to try and pull the shreds of your dignity around you to walk that sort of gauntlet, while inside all you want to do is scream back at the unknowing, unknown haters who have the temerity and Utter Gall to think they have some sort of right to stand in Judgement - or perhaps just to punch a few of them violently and repeatedly in the face to make them back off?
 
It is Not an easy decision to make.  It is even more difficult to carry through with once it's made, even knowing that it IS the best choice available to you.  It is something that you question yourself on for the REST OF YOUR LIFE once it's made.  Yes, I have faced that decision making process.  I faced that hate filled screaming gauntlet.  And not one... NOT ONE... of those screaming "pro-life" folks stopped even for a second to ask me WHY I did what I did, or to find out what my emotional state was in coming to the decision, or to give a flying rat's ass what sort of pain I was in across the emotional and physical spectrum.
 
How many of you who simply say, rather self rightously, "put the kid up for adoption" would stand up and volunteer to take in a child that might not live to see his or her first birthday?  How many of you - HONESTLY - have the fucking Fortitude it takes to raise a severely handicapped child from birth, to deal with the daily emotional traumas, the uncertainty, the constant medical emergencies?  And if you have the fortitude to do it Once, how about 2? 3? 4? that all have severe problems and can't even survive without machines to keep their blood pumping and force oxygen into their lungs, and that will never - for as long as the machines are capable of forcing oxygen - know who you are, who they are, or do anything other than lay in a crib with a feeding tube up their nose while You wait for the machines to finally fail in their task? 
 
It's so easy to sit there, smug and self rightous, saying that it's never a valid option.  That it's never the right choice.  But you're wrong.  Sometimes, it's the Only viable choice.




MadAxeman -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/28/2008 12:42:45 AM)

WOW! We have the winning post.




MistresseLotus -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/28/2008 12:52:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: DomKen

I have an idea, if you don't approve of abortion don't have one. In the great tradition of this nation I expect you to not stick your nose into anyone else's business.


Well, drat!  Now that's just too easy!  Where's the drama??? 

(very good point.  I think all those babies that were forced to be born.. should end up on the doorstep of the well-meaning pro-lifers) 






MistresseLotus -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/28/2008 12:57:50 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: ncprincess

quote:

ORIGINAL: Elisabella


Men have a vested interest in abortion. Or do you imagine that all aborted fetuses are female?

Besides, as the laws currently stand, a woman can terminate a pregnancy without the father's consent or even knowledge. That child wasn't created by the woman alone. That's pretty messed up.


If the pregnancy were a result of rape or incest you think the man should have a say in what happens to the fetus? IMO, the only say I'd give THAT man was if I used a sharp or dull knife to ensure he'd never rape again.


   If only science could find a way to take the result of his rape and implant the fetus into his abodomen to gestate, birth and raise.....




MadAxeman -> RE: Pro-life Anti-Christian (10/28/2008 1:34:39 AM)

Via the ear




Page: <<   < prev  7 8 [9] 10 11   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
3.100586E-02