Musicmystery
Posts: 30259
Joined: 3/14/2005 Status: offline
|
~FR~ Folks are using "socialist" as if it's some danger we're about to fall into, ending capitalism, under the apparent belief that simply leaving everything to the markets will create prosperity, and that any other movement of money undermines that perfect system. This is not realistic. Under a perfect capitalism, you could simply show up and take my produced (or purchased) goods. Perhaps I can afford my own police/army, but that certainly takes away from production, and if I can't afford it, depresses small business. So we agree to have a police/army/justice system---but where does that money come from? We could fund those police/army/justices privately, but then they'd be literally bought and paid for, working for the wealthy that hired them. If this is socialism, then the U.S. has been socialist for over two centuries, and all the candidates are socialist. And if that's your view of capitalism, then only the wealthy have a shot. Such arguments oppose socialism with civilization, not capitalism. Igg, Ogg, and the Creation of Taxes
|