blacksword404
Posts: 2068
Joined: 1/4/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: blackcat39 If this is a woman trying to catch a guy, a guy is naturally faster than women ( why they don't race against each other), so the woman would never catch the guy. After a day, he would move on and she would never catch him before he got bored and did something else, unless he knew he was being followed and waited for her. Two people walk at different speeds, no two people walk at the same speed, its almost like a finger print. Naturally a woman is slower than a guy, and that is why women slow down men when they walk together. I don't think you should overcomplicate this, if the person has skills at tracking and following, that is what should be expressed in the writing, not some lame idea of unrealistic geometry/math. Its not like its rocket science to follow someone at a discrete distance or actively make sure your not being followed. After four pages of people making this into rocket science, I gotta admit, people love to overcomplicate simple things. The story isn't about the math at all. It's the fact that some people like to nitpick and i wanted to make sure the math was right. Otherwise somebody would point out how the story was not accurate. And there would be discussions on the curvature of the earth. And they would get a knee to the gut and an elbow uppercut.
< Message edited by blacksword404 -- 11/8/2008 2:29:56 PM >
_____________________________
Don't fight him. Embrace your inner asshole. Tu fellas magnus penum meum...iterum Genuine catnip/kryptonite. Ego sum erus. The capacity to learn is a gift, the ability to learn a skill, the willingness to learn a choice. Dune HH
|