came4U
Posts: 3572
Joined: 1/23/2007
From: London, Ontario
Status: offline
|
The only way I can describe financial success or lack of is as I have in here before.
I see all attributes in mere primal form. I don't know why, but I do. Guess that is why it can be called an innate calculating of how I view someone of the species. In this case, men, Dominant men.
We are born (hopefully) to adapt to our surroundings, however harsh they may be. The strong survive and the weak fail to thrive.
If a certain population lives and was raised in (or around, or have access to the) major cities of a continent, of which are for the most part Capitalist in generality, then wouldn't it make sense that having more assets, better position in life/finances/power? Whether inherited or not, it is an upper hand upon others--even if you are a 100lb weaking in need of a Charles Atlas workout.
Just as early man had to be the fastest, strongest, fittest of his species to gain control of a certain hunting area or woman/women and access to wilderness for vegetable staples, men today still do the same. They are born, grow up, taught how to be responsible, how to save money (allowance) then to make money (occupation choice) and further to gain more assets though the power of such assets. They in turn (most cases) choose a worthy mate, of similar stature both economically and in mannerism (or any other basic colloquial language of their surroundings). ie: Rarely do we see type M: Bank CEO/Stock Analyst marry a type W: Waitress or Janitor. Choices are made out of class or stock preference. *Lets ignore sickness/bad health and genetic deformities in this discussion.
Primal lusts through supply and demand are often a trigger for any instance of chosing a healthy, successful mate. That supply might be food, it might be percentage of men/women in vicinity, it could even be family status within any given villiage. The demand usually requires the actual choice of such forementioned is equal, higher or lacking. All three of these choices make for a different decision in the end result of suitable consequence. We have grocery stores now, men with more income can choose better cuts of steak, if it were a jungle, he would be the fittest to catch a more delicate fleshy animal. (beast or womanly creature).
In other words, if in this year 2008, a man has not adapted to be productively reasonably successful within a certain timeframe (some say you gotta 'make it, be something, somebody' by age 35 or it ain't gonna happen). Explains why even drug dealers have hot pretty young girls hanging about, even hired goons that imply some sort of undying respect to their bossman. Even if they have succeeded by risk and by illegal activity, there is usually someone else who is available to view your status and seeming prestige as a form of heirarchy and find it worthy of feeling stable within and around him.
ok, what it all means.
if you are not a success by 35, have thrived in the economy, built some assetts via brains or even brawn,...likelyhood you are not fit to be a leader, a protector, a mentor or a guide to very many. If you still mop floors at BK at age 35, you are not likely a candidate for any documentary on any 'survival of the fittest' campaign. You haven't been the brightest or most persistent in getting more out of society than some others strive to (education, formal or informal job enhancement training etc).
*this does not include those who are in actual and true guidance positions such as (borderline altruistics) teachers, police and/or military. This type usually sticks to the field they chose out of enjoyment and deserves merit on a higher emotional and financial scale.
< Message edited by came4U -- 11/3/2008 12:23:10 PM >
_____________________________
It hurts.....that you call me a masochist
|
RE: Clarity - 
Profile
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread