dreamysubmale -> RE: 5 Myths of Socialized Medicine (11/1/2008 10:12:49 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: candystripper bestbabynyc, what on earth makes you think the US is about to adopt a National Health Care System? I think you can rest easy, if it worries you, as the greed of the pharameactical companies, insurance industry, etc. is most likely powerful enough to block such a thing from happening at least during your lifetime. starglre, I have heard some 'horror' stories from people dependent on their NHS about waiting 2 years for a hip replacement, etc. I admit I'm not entirely comfy with the government getting in the health care delivery system...but I am quite comfy with furnishing taxpayer-paid care to the poor and uninsured, of which we have many. candystripper [sm=pole.gif] We have a publicly funded healthcare system, in addition to private hospitals and providers. Treatments are generaly very good and are free or subsidised. Many doctors are providers in both the public and private hospitals. Dental treatment is free for under 18s. Unfortunately, since the Government started to fiddle with the system and appointed Hospital Boards to run the taxpayer-funded Hospitals as if they were Private Corporation, things turned badly. It resulted in a lot more employment of back office administrators and board members with no medical or health knowledge with six and seven figure salaries Even with the pouring of billions of dollars the current public health system is failing to keep up with the demands being placed on it, particularly through elective procedures, and will continue to do so. Waiting lists have trebled and fewer people are getting operations. Deaths occur while in waiting lists. Patients get send home early and often die or return with complications that are more serious or send to Australia for services. Government can’t or won’t provide subsidized new life saving medicines due to high costs which in turn costs or shortens lives. However, despite of all it's faults, we’re lucky enough to have access to an enviable range of comprehensive healthcare services. Our public healthcare system is not substandard to the private healthcare system. The doctors and nurses will treat you with the utmost respect and professionalism as if you were been treated in a private hospital. Moreover, if a country of only four million can afford such a system, I cannot see the reason why the US wont. How can you preach Democracy when you deny your most vulnerable, the poor and uninsured such a basic right? And by the way, its not “socialised medicine” I’d rather call it “compassionate medicine” PS: Please excuse me if there is grammar or spelling mistakes. English isn’t my native language.
|
|
|
|