Satyr6406
Posts: 820
Joined: 3/27/2006 From: New Brunswick, N.J. Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: celticlord2112 quote:
the electoral college appoints the president and the vote of the people is meaningless. And the number of "faithless electors" who have gone against the vote of the people is...???? The number of times the electoral college has invalidated the popular vote is.....???? Re: The Electoral College: There are only nine states where ALL of their electoral votes don't automatically go to the marginal winner of the popular vote. Essentially, this means that less than half of the states (depending on their population) decide who will be president. So, if Californians vote 51% for Sen. A and 49% for Sen. C, then Sen. A gets all of the electoral vote. Not a problem? Oh, really? If the electoral college's votes were dristributed more along the lines of the popular vote, you might have seen some very different results in past races. 1996 and 2000 come to mind, off the top of my head (as does '76 but, I could be mistaken, on that). The Electoral College is an idea whose time is long past unless we wish to assume that people are inherently stupid and not able to make an informed decision for themselves. We have the technology that would allow for a TRUE democratic process in ALL elections instead of situations like the recent one in NYC where Mayor Bloomberg pushed a measure through the city counsel that the people had voted down TWICE (term limits).
< Message edited by Satyr6406 -- 11/12/2008 8:53:05 AM >
_____________________________
Peace and comfort, Michael Former Vice-President Gore didn't invent the internet but, he DID make up global warming!
|