PeonForHer
Posts: 19612
Joined: 9/27/2008 Status: offline
|
So what about anyother request a Domme make in general about a discussion she's having? Were you to be owned would you feel so entitled to being part of her public discussions even though your pointed excluded? Note: I do get the difference between interacting with the Domme who owns you and other Dommes. If so directed by my own domina. (That'd be a strange request, though!) However, that bears no relevance, as you say, to ‘rules’ regarding conduct here. This forum is absolutely not, in my opinion, to be seen as analogous to one Domina (made up of several parts) talking with Her sub (also made up of many parts). Politely...there's more tactful ways to deal with this type of situation than "denied!" (And that's a hell of a statement coming from me) Yes – that was impolite. I should have been a lot less blunt. Apologies to FloridaMistresse for that. Akasha said: To add to that, I'll also state that what a *sub* thinks can help a femdom relationship dynamic work is FAR different from what a femdom thinks, in many cases. I don't care HOW much experience a sub has, he can't 100% state he knows what's going on if he's never been the woman in a relationship. To which Boijen commented: M.Aakasha that's exactly the point of the OP if I get it right. And the point that was obviously not made clear to some reading the thread and following discussion. I cannot possibly know what MsK would say to the thread in question if I didn't ask. I also can only relay the conversation and yes it's different coming from me than Her. Any experience is going to be different for any individual...AND with this one commonality between being a Domme, it provides a certain level of relation to the situation and the opinions on how to deal with the situation. Yes, ‘a certain level of relations’ – but not less. More fundamentally, though – and once again – the original poster doesn’t own the rest of the thread. S/he is just the one who sets a certain theme of a discussion going. If one has an interest, a comment to make, a related question on which help is needed – then, in my view, a contribution is not only legitimate but desirable, because this is what makes so many people read forums. It’s central to their vibrancy. As a side note: I've noticed males (in general) have no problem staking a claim in places and exclaiming "no women allowed" and sticking to that...look at the US military and any Pro sports team. However, when the shoe is on the other foot it's all about how "unfair" it is that a woman would dare exclude men from their lives in any way. Firstly, two wrongs don’t make a right! Secondly, I’m not “men in general”, nor is any other individual male writing here. Thirdly, let’s not forget who else other than men were asked, by implication,to keep their comments to themselves. I’m particularly conscious in this respect right now of Stella’s last contribution, above. Well, this is how I conclude it all to myself. If there were to be a majority decision that questions which exclude certain people are legitimate, I wouldn’t like it, would feel it to be misguided, but I’d go along with it.
< Message edited by PeonForHer -- 11/17/2008 12:12:37 PM >
_____________________________
http://www.domme-chronicles.com
|