mystickoolaid
Posts: 519
Joined: 11/15/2008 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: AAkasha It seems there are a lot of femdoms that have the viewpoint that submissives don't get to give them orgasms. Yet for male subs, the prospect of giving their domina this pleasure is the ultimate carrot. Subs - if you know you will *never* be able to give your femdom an orgasm, does that make you less likely to serve her? How about if you know you are able to make her wet and turn her on, but will never get to see the act through to completion. Aside from cuckolds, it seems the potential submissive pool may be smaller if you take orgasms (for her) off the table. True? Dominant women -- are you able to happily get very turned on, get wet, without having an orgasm, after dominating your submissive partner? Or do you not only take orgasms off the table, you take sexual arousal off as well? Akasha The pool is smaller if you take orgasms off the table on either side. Most male subs AND Doms relationships in this lifestyle tend to be more sexual. I know a lot of male subs who never get to touch their female Doms, while most of the female submissives I know are REQUIRED to service their Master on a regular basis, in whatever way he wants. This is not always true, I have just observed this to be more common. For the Dominant women getting turned on question... for some just having that control is very "hot", for others they are able to stay cool, even cold, calloused, and calculated in their Domination. Everyone has their own style, which can vary depending on the mood, the sub, the situation, etc. I think it boils down to everyone doing things their *own* way and hopes to find (or has found) someone who's ideas mesh well for play or otherwise.
|