ResidentSadist
Posts: 12580
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: a mean old Daddy, but I like you - Joni Mitchell
Status: offline
|
I took the time to compile this comprehensive reply so that newcomers will not mistakenly think that the OP is “unsupported by fact” as hardbodysub claims. I offer you these links to verify for yourself the extensive pudendal nerve research.
“pudendal nerve” links
"pudendal nerve" + "sexual stimulation" links
There is some interesting reading in those links and you will learn of the connection between the G-spot, pudendal nerve and orgasms.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
quote:
ORIGINAL: hardbodysub
You might try reading my post again, slowly this time. . . . .
Ok, I read your post again. . . “slowly”. It still quotes the OP and KoM’s reply making the a comment that you didn’t think KoM’s opinion about it being irresponcible was valid but instead felt the OP was "unsupported by fact and illogical”.
quote:
I specifically said that I DON'T consider your post irresponsible. Someone else said that, earlier, and I disagreed with it.
What the fuck are you talking about? I never said you thought I was irresponsible. In order, I quoted KoM (“I think it is Irresponsible to suggest otherwise”) and you ("unsupported by fact and illogical")… and in order I replied. Perhaps you need to take your own advice and reread this real “slowly” ?
quote:
In regard to the "unsupported by fact and illogical", take a look at this quote: "I have found spanking is pretty much universally sexually arousing. I can even spank most people into orgasmic bliss." I seriously doubt that your sample of spankees is representative of the universe. They probably wouldn't be letting you touch them if they weren't inclined to be turned on by spanking in the first place. Concluding that you can "spank most people into orgasmic bliss" is quite a stretch, and clearly not supported by anything but your own small (in relation to "most people"), unrepresentative, unscientific sample of partners.
That makes the conclusion illogical.
You are wrong and that is a misleading lie because it wasn't the conclusion of the post!
But first, are you really saying my replies to other people had something to do with your comments about the OP being "unsupported by fact"? You have replied two different times in this thread now stating that you were replying to KoM’s post about the OP being “irresponsible” saying you didn’t think KoM’s opinion about it being irresponcible was valid but instead felt the OP was "unsupported by fact and illogical”. Now you want us to believe your comments, which would still be incorrect, were directed at the previously unmentioned post # 6? I don’t think anyone can read “slowly” enough to believe that convoluted bullshit.
My good sir, I do not call you a liar but instead point out that the words you have spoken are untrue. Making up a concordance to my other comments to try and justify it won’t sell very well on these forums. wow . . . just wow . . .
Even if you could change target of your words mid breath, you can’t pluck a few words out of context and claim they are a conclusion. How in the world do you expect readers to believe you and that the supportive opinions I expressed were a “conclusion”? Allow me to explain what my comments in the reply you mention were about. . . if you read "slowly", I am sure you can keep up.
Post # 6 was in reply to littlewonder who said spanking wasn’t sexy when “it just friggin hurts” but if she was “in the mood” and it is “done for pleasure” then it is sexy. I stipulated that “if you do anything brutally enough it becomes painful” and concluded that “if you were approached right and your man turned you on first” it could be sexy. Further, I support the conclusion that approach is important with comments about my own approach saying, “I have found spanking is pretty much universally sexually arousing” and “I can even spank most people into orgasmic bliss”.
I know for a fact you are educated enough to know what a conclusion is. I see you make them yourself. For example, in the Age and BDSM thread, post # 87 you said,
”As everyone knows, nobody over 40 could possibly maintain a youthful physique, look much younger than their years, and be in any way attractive. It's just impossible,…” [and then you make this conclusion] “so nobody under 35 should even consider anyone over 40. Period.”
See, that is what a conclusion looks like. Speaking of conclusions, I have made some of my own. As you now know, I did a thread history on you before I chose which attitude to adopt while writing my response to your second unfounded reply in my thread. I am left with these questions after assessing your post history and deriving your behavior pattern from it.
So what really happened? I mean, you went through all that trouble to quote KoM, disagree with him and jump on his a “bash the OP” wagon. Did you google the pudendal nerve and discover the mountain of clinical sexual studies and information about it that made your comments looks foolish?
/you just been spanked and I bet it wasn’t sexual stimulating
_____________________________
-=BDSM Book List=- Reading is Fundamental !!!
I give good thread.
|
RE: -=Does spanking lead to sexual arousal?=- - 
Profile
RE: -=Does spanking lead to sexual arousal?=- - 
To top it off, I'm now in the mood for oyster/clam bisque. How weird is that?
New Messages
No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages
Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages
Locked w/o New Messages
Post New Thread