Termyn8or -> RE: Black Friday Death at Wal-Mart (11/29/2008 2:06:11 PM)
|
I have a great deal of disdain for Walmart, their business practices, their ways and means, and I don't go there. I also try to see all sides of an issue. However in this case, I can't fathom any reasoning that would put the blame on Walmart. None whatsoever. I don't care if they had brand new Rolls Royces for a dollar, it is simply not their fault, plain and simple. So this is what the sheeple have become, nothing but cattle that needs to be penned up and fenced in. What if someone had been killed outside instead ? Would that indemnify Walmart ? What if someone got into a car wreck heading for Walmart, sue them anyway ? What if someone broke their leg in a hurry to get to their car to drive to Walmart, that's their fault as well ? This is as ridiculous as suing gun manufacturers for firearm deaths, I mean when there was no defect in the firearm. I can understand if it goes off without someone pulling (or squeezing) the trigger, but if it operates properly, it is a ridiculous premise for a lawsuit and a very bad precedent to set. Look at how people drive on the highway, it is clear that people simply have no regard for the safety or well being of others. You want another one ? It happened years ago in Cinncinati, Ohio. Just look for Cinncinati Ohio festival seating (I think it was a Who concert). Several people died vying for better seats at a rock concert. Who is to blame ? I say it's not the owner of the establishment, nor the band, nor their producers or promoters. The blame lies with the people, period. Someone backed into my Father's Oldsmobile in their Chevy. Who do I sue GM ? Or maybe whoever sold them the gasoline. How about the tire mnufacturer, after all without these in place the accident could have been prevented. Without anti-freeze the engine would have overheated and locked up thus preventing the accident, so the producer of the antifreeze is equally and severally liable no ? As well as the ones who sold the oil in the engine, the fluid in the transmission. By this screwed up logic today I guess the only one who could not be considered at fault is the firm that sold the brake fluid in the car, except that their brake fluid failed to detect something in the way and failed to cause auto-application of the brakes on that Chevy. Damn, could have sued almost everyone including the steel mill that provided the metal for that Chevy. And to think, he settled for three hundred bucks. Want me to go on ? Chevys have Bosch fuel injectors, now a dented car door is an international incident ! Don't forget that the Chevy would not have started without a battery, so sue them too, bastards ! You picking up what I am laying down here ? I have no love for Walmart, I don't go there I don't like them I think their shit is junk and I think they have harmed the economy of this country. But I simply can't lay this one on them. It's the most ridiculous thing I have heard in a long time. T
|
|
|
|