Collarspace Discussion Forums


Home  Login  Search 

More newbie thoughts...


View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
 
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> More newbie thoughts... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 10:33:51 AM   
Crazytwice


Posts: 145
Joined: 11/28/2005
From: North of Boston
Status: offline
Here's another hurdle in my attempt to understand and embrace d/s.
Perhaps I'm not submissive, perhaps I'm "hearing" the wrong doms, or perhaps I simply misunderstand.

Anyway... here goes:

I'm a big proponent of the equal division of labor, especially in the running of a busy household. I've seen far too many marriages fail because one partner felt they were working harder than the other. I'll use a real-life scenario to clarify this point.
For example, the reality of our current economy makes it necessary for many
(if not most) households to rely on a two-person income. Often both husband and wife are carrying a 40-hour plus workweek outside the home. Because many woman ( I believe ),
are more attuned to child-rearing and household management ( be it from nature or nurture), she carries this additional burden. Fatique and burn-out can ensue, resentment may build, intimacy becomes a thing of the past, and the relationship disintregrates.
The wife may decide she can do better with someone else, or even alone, having one less person to manage in the mix. The husband is dismissed as a liability to her efforts.
He is spiritually castrated, feeling that he was unable to fulfill his need to lead, protect, and support his family.
( He is "pussified", if you will, which I know is another thread but I had to add my 2 cents.
I think the pussification of the American male is greatly influenced by economics).

OK, back on track. Given that a couple may be in it for the long haul, a lifetime commitment as the goal, how does a master/slave relationship address the problems inherent in unequal division of labor?

I have read doms proclaim that after a 12-hour workday, they feel entitled to come home and have their needs met. I'm sure many vanilla men feel this way too. I have no real problem there. But what if his partner has also put in a 12-hour workday? I am exhausted after a 12 hour shift. I would resent having to meet my dom's needs while my own needs ( rest, for example), were left unmet.

As a slave, are you expected to ignore your own needs for the goal of living in service?
We all have a basic heirarchy of needs. If these basic needs aren't being met, how can we truly give of ourselves to others?

I can embrace the sacrifice of self for an ideal and a power believed to be greater than my self. From the common but by no means trivial sacrifice required in raising a child, to the more lofty goal of community service or dedicating one's life to the service of God.

But is a master/slave relationship an ideal, a power greater than ourselves? Am I expected to set aside my own needs to meet those of one who is perfectly capable of tending to himself? Someone who is, after all, just another man, with the same
frailties, limitations, needs, and desires as myself?

Just thinking...
I eagerly await opinions and feedback.
Thank you in advance.
CT

_____________________________

"If you build it, he will come"
~Field of Dreams~
Profile   Post #: 1
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 11:02:04 AM   
Shayna


Posts: 205
Joined: 1/16/2005
Status: offline
quote:

As a slave, are you expected to ignore your own needs for the goal of living in service?
We all have a basic heirarchy of needs. If these basic needs aren't being met, how can we truly give of ourselves to others?

I can embrace the sacrifice of self for an ideal and a power believed to be greater than my self. From the common but by no means trivial sacrifice required in raising a child, to the more lofty goal of community service or dedicating one's life to the service of God.

But is a master/slave relationship an ideal, a power greater than ourselves? Am I expected to set aside my own needs to meet those of one who is perfectly capable of tending to himself? Someone who is, after all, just another man, with the same
frailties, limitations, needs, and desires as myself?


Never having been a slave, I can just say it's my understanding that yes, a slave's first priority is to serve her/his Master. It sounds like it's not your cup of tea given your struggles with the notion of putting a Master's needs before your own.

My suggestion is to think through what you are looking for in a relationship. There are many resources on the net to help you understand various ways of being in a D/s relationship or participating in BDSM activities. Finding out what works for you and your needs is part of the adventure.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 2
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 11:03:05 AM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
Hmm, well, in my case...

My slavery ( let's call it that for arguments sake ) arouse from my marriage. It was such a slow process though that I never really stopped to analyze it. My husband was military, already had 3 children when I met him ( his first wife had passed giving birth to the youngest ), so, when we married, there was no question of me working outside the home. Though I was never 'told' that I could not work outside the home, I made the assumption that I would not ( this just happened to be what he wanted anyway, so the discussion was never necessary ).

After our daughter was born, HE made the decision that I should go back to school. This was not something that I wanted to do; he decided that it would be in my best interest, and so it was done. Our youngest was only a year at that time. Quite frankly my day, once I started school again, was quite busy...get up, make breakfast for everyone, take the 3 oldest to school, clean up the house, drop the baby off at my moms, go to school...pick the 3 oldest up from school, pick the baby up, go home...wash clothes, make dinner, help with homework, keep an eye on the baby...have dinner ready when my husband came home...sit down have dinner, clean the dishes, finish any chores that still needed to be done...sit down for an hour or two with the family...go to bed. Sometimes, he would come and help me with the dishes and we would spend that time talking about our day, and about small things ( quality time between the adults ).

Through all this, I never once felt that I was being shortchanged. Never thought that my role was less than his. If anything, he showed me every single day that 'my service and devotion' to him and his wants and needs were appreciated, needed, and wanted.

When I finished with school, he sat down with me and asked me if I wanted to work outside the home; my answer was a resounding NO. I was content to take care of him, our family, and our home. Things may have been easier money wise if I had worked outside the home, but we were lucky that it never came to that extent.

That's just from my own experience though.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 3
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 11:23:51 AM   
LuckyAlbatross


Posts: 19224
Joined: 10/25/2005
Status: offline
All relationships are about mutual fulfillment.

All responsible adults have to take care of things in their lifes. Dom's don't get a "Don't pay bills" card and subs don't get a "Don't take out the trash" card.

HOW you divvy up responsibilities is up to the individual relationship. D/s isn't about acts- it's about the dynamic.

Some dominants are "stay at home doms" while the sub is the one to go out and work at a paying job. It works great for them.

What matters is that the sub is adhering to the authority of the dom, that everyone is doing what needs to be done, that everyone is fulfilled and that life runs smoothly.

However you work that out in your own relationship is what works best for you.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 4
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 11:29:20 AM   
troilus


Posts: 11
Joined: 11/25/2005
Status: offline
D/s can be as little as the Dom setting the sexual agenda each night to as much as total slavery, where the sub lives in a cage, is sent out to work hard for the Master, and comes home exhausted and still has to satisfy the Master. I'm dominant but uncomfortable with such a high level of D/s. I see my dominance as being able to fulfill my desires and also to physically control my sexual partner. Also, I like being able to tell someone to do something she might not otherwise do, and have her do it, and enjoy the looks on her face and such. A good sub for me would find enjoyment in our sexual activity like so. But if she came home and said, "I can't do it tonight" that'd be the end of discussion, and hopefully she'd be less exhausted later in the week.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 5
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 11:31:30 AM   
OscarHargraves


Posts: 693
Joined: 8/9/2005
Status: offline
Let's face it. There are some times when D's doesn't work for some people. That's not to say it doesn't work AT ALL for them. I'm saying that they may have to be able to turn it on and off. If you are both working outside the home and working 12 hour days then maybe you need to be man & wife on weekdays and Dom & Sub on weekends.

It sounds like a Master & Slave relationship just isn't going to work. You are already chaffing at the bit and unless you can stop that things will only get worse. If you had a Dom/Sub relationship (vs. a Master/Slave relationship) you could still share the tasks and responsibilities to accomplish everything without giving up your D's life.

However if this man does not appreciate that you work the same tiring schedule he does and still wants you to do everything at home then it's time for a serious talk and maybe even some professional counseling. Don't let your anger and bad feelings eat up your love. Fix it or get help fixing it so you two can continue to be happy with each other.


< Message edited by OscarHargraves -- 12/25/2005 11:32:26 AM >


_____________________________

Never drive faster than your guardian angel can fly ! !

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 6
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 11:42:58 AM   
Delvin


Posts: 151
Joined: 8/23/2005
From: Texas
Status: offline
There are many aspects to serving someone and each home will handle how a slave functions from day to day. Though before going into some of the details, let us look at some of the not so obvious views, values, rituals and beliefs within this lifestyle.

Many believe that this life of Master and slave is one of mental and spiritual over the actual physical and the need to BE drives people to this. We can remove some of the "chores" for a moment a slave may endure in a home, and we can remove the "needs" of the Master as well as the slave for the moment as well. The belief that Master is in control of his home and all who reside in it, the belief that slave is there as an object to be used to ease the Master's life.

The value of a slave and the rituals a slave may do on a daily basis for me seems to keep the girls in check within themselves. These can be from something as simple as asking permission to go do something away from Master to elaborate rituals involving getting dressed, fixing dinner, eating and sleeping. Each one of these "rituals" tends to keep both Master and slave focused on their life and who and what they are. How a Master views you and that look he gives is all that is needed sometimes. Are you a slave in his eyes? or have you changed to something he needs to place on a pedestal or marry or worse, become partners within the relationship. Is he Master and you slave?

Chores are chores be it cooking dinner to fixing the doorbell to painting that spare room. Some chores are daily, taking out the trash, cleaning the home to the "lets add another room to the house (cringe)", and given the needs of both Master and slave, how the Master runs his home will ultimately decide whether a slave even works outside the home. Sure, the money is nice, both working, both achieving...what? Somewhere the decision to make more money vs. being who you are must come up. For some this may not be a conflict while others may loose focus on what they are, driving home the need to work and pay bills (yes even the kinky have bills) the fact that you are owned or own someone could get lost, or at the very least overlooked sometimes.

Now, if your looking at these chores as "well, he could do that just as easily", I would think some slaves may ask you to rethink what you feel you are, while some Masters would begin the lecture of slave and the requirements to serve. Real life example coming up;

I go to grab a cup of coffee. It is an easy process, I stand, walk to the kitchen, pour the coffee and mix in the sugar and cream to taste then walks back to my desk. In Horror my slave will come running out of the bedroom with a look of total rejection because she failed to get that coffee. I smile, whisper something like (I'm bottoming from the top) and send her on her way.

She has had a long day, tired perhaps or simply needed some alone time for herself (I know, strictly forbidden in MASTERS GUIDE 101), but whatever...

We have our rituals which constantly keeps us focused, and she will be the first to tell you she will extend those elf-like radar ears for the next cup of coffee I need and be there to serve it, tired or not.

I can do it all, clean my home, do my laundry, cook and even...gasp...dress myself. But then, why have a slave? Why have domestic slaves? Maybe just a little sex toy instead?

Naw, it goes a lot deeper then any chore thank goodness

D

p.s. (going to start placing this damn message in my posts)... These views are mine, and there are simply too many different variations and views AND labels AND beliefs to even begin to listing them. Anything I post unless mentioned is my belief and posted like this to avoid the highjacker a reason to whine and moan that this isn't "their" belief.

(in reply to IrishMist)
Profile   Post #: 7
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 12:01:24 PM   
BlkTallFullfig


Posts: 5585
Joined: 6/25/2004
Status: offline
quote:

Never having been a slave, I can just say it's my understanding that yes, a slave's first priority is to serve her/his Master. It sounds like it's not your cup of tea given your struggles with the notion of putting a Master's needs before your own.

My suggestion is to think through what you are looking for in a relationship. There are many resources on the net to help you understand various ways of being in a D/s relationship or participating in BDSM activities. Finding out what works for you and your needs is part of the adventure
My sentiments have been expressed by Shayna, no need for me to repeat the words. M

_____________________________

a.k.a. SexyBossyBBW
""Touching was, and still is, and will always be, the true revolution" Nikki Giovanni

(in reply to Shayna)
Profile   Post #: 8
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 1:12:17 PM   
candystripper


Posts: 3486
Joined: 11/1/2005
Status: offline
Crazytwice (such a cool nick), maybe if i explain my thoughts it will help you.

First, i think the two people in the relationship choose their labels (or forego them) as it enhances their enjoyment of the relationship. You may well end up as a "slave" but it would be up to your "Master" to help figure out what that meant.

Not all slaves or submissives are house slaves. i hate housekeeping; washing dishes, doing laundry, cooking, food shopping etc. My standard of cleanliness is "gee, i wish this house would get straightened out". i hope/want/desire a Man with enough money to pay for a few hours of maid service a month, and who can cook, after which i would do dishes. In short, He'd share the chores with me so i'd be happiest and freeiest to play, etc.

i do have fantasises that might be callled "sevice". Bathing Him; giving Him manicures and pedicures; massaging Him; etc. i hope to find as many as such pleasures for us both as possible. (And of course, i am looking forward to play and sex.)

i hope this helps. Your relationship can be anything you want, working within the parameters of finances and time, etc. But just because a Man does all the cooking does not make Him any less the Dom, or Master.

candystripper


< Message edited by candystripper -- 12/25/2005 1:14:39 PM >

(in reply to BlkTallFullfig)
Profile   Post #: 9
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 1:18:28 PM   
IrishMist


Posts: 7480
Joined: 11/17/2005
Status: offline
I wanted to add something that I was thinking about. Submission or Slavery...it really comes down to the dynamics between the two people involved. With my husband, there was no question that I was a slave; but with others, I have not been able to give that level of devotion; so it was more of submission ( in my own eyes, and my own opinion that is ). It all really comes down to who and what you are with the person that you are with at that time.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 10
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 1:25:25 PM   
Noah


Posts: 1660
Joined: 7/5/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crazytwice

Here's another hurdle in my attempt to understand and embrace d/s.
Perhaps I'm not submissive, perhaps I'm "hearing" the wrong doms, or perhaps I simply misunderstand.

Anyway... here goes:

.....

But is a master/slave relationship an ideal, a power greater than ourselves? Am I expected to set aside my own needs to meet those of one who is perfectly capable of tending to himself? Someone who is, after all, just another man, with the same
frailties, limitations, needs, and desires as myself?

Just thinking...
I eagerly await opinions and feedback.
Thank you in advance.
CT


I think there is a crucial issue here that is kind of slipping by un-noticed. Let me say that the ways you choose to value things and name things are up to you; I'm not here to judge them wrong.

Is sounds as though there is a certain calculus at work in your post in which some unnamed things, things which you enjoy and want, would betallied up in a plus column. You allude to some so forgive me If I don't get the particulars just right as that doesn't affect the point I'm trying to share. It seems that it would be tallied in the plus column that someone you loved comitted himself to you in some way, it would presumably count in the plus column if he behaved toward you in a dominant fashion, if he contributed to a sense of belonging in you, contributed to some fun for you and maybe a fulfilling sex life. I'm guessing that your calculus counts things like those as plusses on his ledger too and I think that you would like very much to be abe to give him lots of plusses on his ledger. I am not saying, for instance, that it sounds like you are only thinking about this in terms of what is in it for you.

It sounds though as if, when you come home tired from work and are presented with cooking dinner for him, say, or picking up his towels from the bathroom floor or rubbing his feet, that these would be accounted in the minus column, because after all you had a rough day too, etc.

quote:

As a slave, are you expected to ignore your own needs for the goal of living in service?
We all have a basic heirarchy of needs. If these basic needs aren't being met, how can we truly give of ourselves to others?


Some people who call themselves submissive or slave are not ignoring their own needs by addressing the needs or desires of their dominant. Some people find Service to Others listed very very high in their own personal needs hierarchy. They would rather serve than rest, so to speak, it is almost as if they live to serve and they rest only reluctantly, only because their body demands it.

I'll offer you an example meant to illustrate my point. Think of an adult who had to get up in the night to attend to a houseguest who stupidly drank too much and became ill. That might very well be counted as a negative in his relationship with the houseguest. But that same adult, awakened by the sound of his child being sick would rush from his bed and be present for the child, not tallying the cost in lost sleep against the child, for instance. He might not be thinking explicitly about it because he was busy with the crisis but if he reflected upon it later he might be grateful for having had the oportunity to be present for his beloved child. The whole yucky transaction would in the end count as a positive in the parent's life. It is a good life and a richly meaningful one in which one can do something as important as tend to and sooth and clean up after a beloved innocent in need or danger.

(Of course you referred to this sort of dynamic in your post. I don't imagine I'm introducing you to an idea. I'm only positioning it in the conversation at a certain angle.)

Now the situations don't mirror each other perfectly by any means, the wife coming home tired to towels on the floor and the parent of the sick child. I know. But in each case the character of the response can be the same, if the person involved chooses to encounter events in a certain way.

As you have suggested, some people are very oriented to acts of service. They find fulfillment in acts of service generally. Toward family, friends, community, even strangers. They don't think I had to do that for him but rather I got to do that for him, or her.

A service oriented person can be subject to some insidious negative societal pressure. Friends (or others) who don't themselves feel a service orientation may look at a service oriented person and tell her for her own good "the way you are acting is wrong and unhealthy. You shouldn't do so much for people. It isn't fair. You should count up your acts of service in a book and unless someone matches you tit for tat you shouldn't do things for them. If you keep serving people it means that something is wrong, injustice exists and you are its victim, and this all might say something very bad about you."

If acting in service is a quite natural mode for a person to express love or simply express herself then I think that she should not trouble herself much about what that sort of critic says. Every time (I'm speaking very generally of course; I don't mean literally or necessarily every single time) a service oriented person gets to do an act of service it just naturally records itself in her plus column. She feels rewarded by it. It is case of the old saying about virtue being its own reward.

If your own personality is not as heavy on Will to Serve then you might want a relationship in which you are appreciated for expressing your care and devotion and yes, submissiveness, in other ways. That would be fine and there are plenty of potential partners for wonderful relationships of that sort. Imagine a man for whom a thorough sort of self-sufficiency is so natural and so deeply ingrained that it just doesn't even make sense in his world for other people to do mundane chores for him. He might still have a need or desire to exert his will upon a willing partner, to be submitted to, that is. And he might frequent your favorite bookstore and be totally hot, so keep your eyes open.

Another possibility for a person who does not feel a strong service orientation would be to commit to a high degree of service anyway, not in any way that devalues her natural inclination, mind you. But as what might be called in aother context a sacrificial offering. A certain person who does not find fulfillment in service might find fulfillment in the sacrifice, as such. This especially if she knows that the person she loves and wants to be with is naturally or culturally tuned to encounter acts of service as acts of love. I am obviously not introducing the notion of noble sacrifice to you but only reflecting on the subject which you raised eloquently in your post.

Another, slightly different approach, less centered upon ones' own psychology, would be open up the value calculus in a different way. Are you aware--hopefully because he told you quite unambiguously--that it gives your partner a deep sort of pleasure, far beyond that of the foot rub itself, to experience your devotion in the form of this end-of-the-day massage? Does it happen to be the case, or could you choose to make it the case that his pleasure in this might be a deep pleasure and fulfillment to you, outweighing your native displeasure at postponing your rest?

If not, that is fine. No one should suggest that if you can't process service in these ways that you are unworthy. It may be given to you to express your submissivness and your devotion in quite different ways. It may take imagination on your part or your partners to discover a sort of d/s relationship which differs in its externals from the quite typical service-oriented model. Then again, when you hook up with the right person it may take no imagination at all. It may just pour down on both of you like delicious rain. Ask that cute guy at the bookstore what he thinks.

You said I'm a big proponent of the equal division of labor, especially in the running of a busy household. I've seen far too many marriages fail because one partner felt they were working harder than the other.

I'm cautioning that this analysis may leave important things out. For some people, the opportunity to "work harder" may itself be a treasured thing. If someone feels in her heart the desire to serve without respect to notions of balance or proportion, but bows to societal norms and lets herself feel bad about what would naturally make her feel good then this inner conflict will surely reverberate in her marriage. So it may not be the imbalance in work that ruins all of these marriage. Some, surely; even most, maybe. But perhaps it others it isn't the imbalance in work but rather s failure to look deeply into the personal meanings of things.

There has been lots of talk here about how a masochist needn't feel bad or sick or wrong about her desire to suffer. Extremely service oriented submissives however are occasionally seen as fools or doormats. This is too bad. Similarly, for someone to say that a woman with a strong submissive urge but no significant service orientation is not a true submissive would be at best premature. As for me I would want to hear about the modes in which her inwardly felt submissive urge wishes to express itself. I would not rule out in advance the possibility of other equally deep and lovely modes of expression.

Now if it is clear that she wants nothing more than to be a shrewish, selfish manipulator who goes by the name "kajira" and gets a spanking whenever she bloody well wants one then yeah, I'd suggest that she's just playing with language when she calls herself a slave. She could make a case for calling herself a dominant, though.

In your case it might turn out after a slow and careful period of self-examination that picking up more than half the dirty socks would be an imbalance that you can't relax into and be fully present in. I thinks any way it turns out for you will be fine if it results from a deeply genuine encounter with yourself and with your eventual partner(s) and strong, open-hearted communication.

So here is a question for you, if you care to consider it silently or in a response here: Whereas acts of service may not be an area where you feel comfortable going above and beyond, are there other areas where you really would relish abandoning any egalitarian notion of fairness and just pouring yourself out into the relationship, wanting far more for your partner than for yourself?

I do see my own primary relationship as a thing greater than its component parts, greater, in a sense, than either she or I or the both of us. I expect my partner to leave notions of fairness far behind just as we each do in our relationships with our children. I expect her to give and give in the modes pleasing to me and appropriate to her. This notion of appropriateness bu the way is far bigger and more complex than her preferences or whims. I expect after all this giving for her to finish by wishing she could have given even more ... not in a sense that results in self-dissatisfaction but rather results in the desire to remain deeply engaged.

Similarly the things she comes to me for are not spooned out jealously. I enjoy watching her flail and sputter as she tries to navigate the outpouring. But even though one could force this to fit a theoretical model of Fairness: generosity reciprocal for generosity, anyone who saw our relationship in those terms would be blind to one--or several--of the most important truths about us.

In the common sphere I am, as you suggest: "... just another man ..." but it is important to note the flaw in the rest of your sentence. I don't have: "... the same frailties, limitations, needs, and desires as" my partner. I have mine and she has hers and there are both commonalities and contrasts. She and I are as different as hand and glove. Outside the common sphere, in the world she and I inhabit together, I am anything but just another man and she is anything but just another woman. I the world she and I inhabit together the rules for getting along in the common sphere just don't even come into play--if you'll pardon the expression

Our relationship, you might say, is one of those houses that is way bigger on the inside than the outside. But I suspect that most healthy relationships are like that, never mind what the neighbors might think.

Good luck, crazytwice. Your earnest approach to the question and reluctance to accept canned answers suggest to me that you are going to be fine. Never mind what the neighbors might think.

Especially doms given to handing out free advice.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 11
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 1:57:46 PM   
xxblushesxx


Posts: 9318
Joined: 11/3/2005
From: Kentucky
Status: offline
Wonderful well thought-out answers. I am v impressed!

You know...all relationships are different. Some men want a 'slave' and want her to be in the home most of the time, not out working. The ones I have met like this have made that v clear, and seem to have the means to facilitate that.

I don't know if it's logical to expect an equal division of labour. All relationships seem to have their peaks and valleys...an ebb and flow, so that, at one time, I may be doing most, and another, the other partner does more.

Different doms will want, need and expect different things. Find one you're compatible with. Consider being a submissive and not a slave. I have only met one I would have considered being a slave to...and that is only because of my deep feelings and trust in this person.

You may want to make housework a hard limit! *lol* I know I've considered it! *g*

Just take your time and find one whose feelings and need mirror yours. They are out there!

I'll talk to you when I get back from my trip, Crazy!!

Christina

(in reply to Noah)
Profile   Post #: 12
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 2:04:01 PM   
MHOO314


Posts: 3628
Joined: 9/26/2004
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: LuckyAlbatross

All relationships are about mutual fulfillment.

All responsible adults have to take care of things in their lifes. Dom's don't get a "Don't pay bills" card and subs don't get a "Don't take out the trash" card.

HOW you divvy up responsibilities is up to the individual relationship. D/s isn't about acts- it's about the dynamic.

Some dominants are "stay at home doms" while the sub is the one to go out and work at a paying job. It works great for them.

What matters is that the sub is adhering to the authority of the dom, that everyone is doing what needs to be done, that everyone is fulfilled and that life runs smoothly.

However you work that out in your own relationship is what works best for you.



I cannot agree with LA more---we forget that D/s is a dynamic---a dance of the dynamic---that dynamic is negotiated between the two--but at the end of the day, when the whips are hung away and the latex is drying--we are human beings--lives must be led, bills paid, family to tend to--those things, the tasks associated with those things should be negotiated as well---you have seen many of us talk of communication and negotiation, that does not stop at safewords, toys, hard limits--it also extends to who takes out the garbage...



_____________________________

SLUTS: Southern Ladies Under Tremendous Stress...

Mistress Hathor


(in reply to LuckyAlbatross)
Profile   Post #: 13
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 2:28:05 PM   
Marquisd


Posts: 61
Joined: 11/1/2005
Status: offline
Hi Crazytwice.

Well thought out OP.
Thanks for making my mind think in that direction. Imho, I don't think of a relationship as something I want to take soemthing out of................elaborating on that......

If both partners in a relationship give into the relationship then the glass should always be full and the relationship will evolve and grow..........

if only one person gives into the relationship or one takes out more than they put in - over time the relationship will dwindle, wither and eventually cease to exist.

If both are taking without giving anything into the relationship..................well..........that's not going to last very long and one should ask themselves why they want to be in a relationship to start with.

Back to your point..............I do not count on who did what...........just like submission is a gift and you appreaciate your gift. There are vanilla moments in life.........kids..............relatives that live in a box......work.......and all that.

If one takes the point of view that your "relationship glass" is always full - then it will become a balancing act to not overfill the glass.


So, for a couple I believe that that is one of the ways to look at it without making it the only way......just something that works for me as a top.


cheers

Marquisd

_____________________________

Relationships develop at the speed of trust

"Official Sadist and Dom of the 2010 Winter Games"

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 14
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 2:29:32 PM   
caitlyn


Posts: 3473
Joined: 12/22/2004
Status: offline
I think this is a well crafted and subtle conspiracy by a very select group of men, designed to use our darkest desires for wild sexual activity, as a method to get us all back into the kitchen.

Not a very well thought out strategy as it applies to me, as the "victor" would be forced to eat my cooking.

(in reply to MHOO314)
Profile   Post #: 15
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 2:47:15 PM   
LadiesBladewing


Posts: 944
Joined: 8/31/2005
Status: offline
Crazytwice, You discuss a couple of concepts here, rather than one single perspective issue, so I would like to address the answers in the portions of the question to which they apply.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Crazytwice

Here's another hurdle in my attempt to understand and embrace d/s.
Perhaps I'm not submissive, perhaps I'm "hearing" the wrong doms, or perhaps I simply misunderstand.


any of these is a possibility, or perhaps you haven't found the D/s perspective that suits the way that you are able to live.

quote:

I'm a big proponent of the equal division of labor, especially in the running of a busy household. I've seen far too many marriages fail because one partner felt they were working harder than the other. I'll use a real-life scenario to clarify this point.
For example, the reality of our current economy makes it necessary for many
(if not most) households to rely on a two-person income. Often both husband and wife are carrying a 40-hour plus workweek outside the home. Because many woman ( I believe ),
are more attuned to child-rearing and household management ( be it from nature or nurture), she carries this additional burden. Fatique and burn-out can ensue, resentment may build, intimacy becomes a thing of the past, and the relationship disintregrates.
The wife may decide she can do better with someone else, or even alone, having one less person to manage in the mix. The husband is dismissed as a liability to her efforts.
He is spiritually castrated, feeling that he was unable to fulfill his need to lead, protect, and support his family.
( He is "pussified", if you will, which I know is another thread but I had to add my 2 cents.
I think the pussification of the American male is greatly influenced by economics).

OK, back on track. Given that a couple may be in it for the long haul, a lifetime commitment as the goal, how does a master/slave relationship address the problems inherent in unequal division of labor?


This is not strictly a D/s question... the wording that you use brings into play the idea of D/s specifically relating to those individuals who are exploring a more intense, more demanding version of the D/s lifestyle, called M/s or O/s (Master/slave or Owner/slave). In these cases, there is no such thing as "unequal division of labor". The agreement at the time of collaring is that the Master or Owner will decide how things will be divided, and that becomes law. It isn't the average way of doing things, and is a lot less typical than it may appear on forums. There are -many- Dominant/submissive relationships where the division of household labor is considered separately from other aspects of the relationship. It is also possible, even in a M/s relationship, for the Owner to decide that an egalitarian division of household labor is what suits him or her.

In our household, it is true that labor is not evenly divided. We do some things in our own household, and our servant works and also maintains a separate household for the moment, however, in time, even though she works outside the household, she will still be responsible for attending to our home. It is what we agreed to, and works for us, since both myself and my co-matriarch have not only our day jobs, but are working on building businesses in our hours away from work that we anticipate will provide for us for years to come (neither of us plans to ever retire -- we prefer to have work that we love and cherish until our lives here are over.) In time, we will have a full staff, and no one servant will be required to carry the full load of caring for our home, but for now, our girl is responsible for handling it. It isn't something that we forced on her. She knew the requirements, and even now is only in a consideration collar, so if she felt that she was unwilling to work within our requirements, she could petition release. We do not expect to hear whining or sense resentment from her. If she feels those things and is unwilling to put herself through it and decides she doesn't want to follow the conditions of a collar with us after having talked with us about ways to resolve the situation, then we are probably not the right place for her, and all that we ask is that she be brutally honest with herself and with us.

That doesn't mean that she'll never -feel- resentment. I expect that, at some point, she will experience resentment, anger, even the desire to cut corners or shirk in her service. It is my hope and our -expectation- that when she feels these things, she will come to us. Either she will come to us seeking out a way to improve her focus and restore her joy in service, or she will come to us and let us know that she is unwilling to continue. Either way, it was her honesty that caused us to consider her, and I know that when she struggles with these things, she will be honest as well, even though it won't be easy.

quote:

I have read doms proclaim that after a 12-hour workday, they feel entitled to come home and have their needs met. I'm sure many vanilla men feel this way too. I have no real problem there. But what if his partner has also put in a 12-hour workday? I am exhausted after a 12 hour shift. I would resent having to meet my dom's needs while my own needs ( rest, for example), were left unmet.


In an enslavement relationship, the idea is that the slave yields up hir needs to service, -choosing- to place the owner's needs above hir own and to allow the scope of hir needs to be determined by hir Owner. If you don't feel that this is something you are called to do, then the best suggestion is not to accept a position that would require this. There are so many permutations of this life that there is no reason to accept something that you find intolerable.

quote:

As a slave, are you expected to ignore your own needs for the goal of living in service?
We all have a basic heirarchy of needs. If these basic needs aren't being met, how can we truly give of ourselves to others?


It is my responsibility, as an owner, to see to it that the basic needs of my servants are being met. I may do this by helping them to help themselves, or by providing either substance or resource. HOWEVER, there is a huge difference between a "need" and a "want". Many individuals do not even come close to pressing themselves to the point of "need". They give as much as they can give without giving so much that it stretches them, and then say that that is all they are willing to contribute. "At the end of my willing contribution" doesn't mean "I -need- to stop." it means "I don't -want- to do any more." A slave gives up the right to say "I don't want..." or "I want..." and runs the risk that the Owner might say "You aren't done and don't need a break yet, take care of -this-." For the individual who doesn't want to take that risk, call it what it is -- a want -- and don't accept a place where that becomes part of the equation.

After full workdays, and with chronic health issues, I still manage to come home and work on my projects, build my future, and teach. I am often tired, but "tired" is repairable. I may give up my television, my recreational reading or any number of other recreational activities to be able to get the things done that I need to get done, and that is just a fact. When my body can't do any more, I take a break... but even then, I find myself compelled to push myself just a little bit more, so when I can, I do.

In the same way, Lady SilverRose comes home from work and starts on her homework for medical school. She often spends evenings and weekends working into the early morning hours towards her dream. On top of this, we are raising a bright, intelligent, insightful and precocious teenaged short person. We try to make time for family time, for teaching time, for recreation and for our dreams, and somehow, we manage to be able to do so and cope with a bit of "crabby" and some exhaustion as part of the "sweat equity" in our dreams.

We have high expectations for our servants, but also have high expectations for ourselves. We tend to our servants' "needs", but reserve the right to determine what is a 'need' and what is a 'want', and direct them accordingly. For someone who wishes to retain the right to determine whether something is a need or a want for hirself, that person probably wouldn't be particularly interested in an Owner/servant - style relationship.

quote:

I can embrace the sacrifice of self for an ideal and a power believed to be greater than my self. From the common but by no means trivial sacrifice required in raising a child, to the more lofty goal of community service or dedicating one's life to the service of God.

But is a master/slave relationship an ideal, a power greater than ourselves? Am I expected to set aside my own needs to meet those of one who is perfectly capable of tending to himself? Someone who is, after all, just another man, with the same
frailties, limitations, needs, and desires as myself?


An Owner/servant relationship -can- be an ideal greater than the individuals involved. Choosing to live in service to others, whether that service is communal or individual, is a high calling, and an art that is dying in our "gimme gimme" world. I've lived in both communal and individual service situations, both as a monk and as a personal servant, and I can tell you that the call to serve can be every bit as compelling in both situations, and the ideal of service and the standard to which one holds oneself in that standard can be every bit as idealistic and fulfilling. However, if one is not called to that, or prefers not to answer the call if it is there, there is no amount of discipline, punishment or force that can evoke the proper mind, heart and spirit-set to make the service done anything but an annoyance to be resented.

Choose carefully. Perhaps the aspects of service are not ones that call you in this life.

Lady Zephyr



< Message edited by LadiesBladewing -- 12/25/2005 2:58:55 PM >


_____________________________


"Should have", "could have", "would have" and "can't" may be the most dangerous phrases in the English language.

Bladewing Enclave

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 16
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 3:13:16 PM   
Focus50


Posts: 3962
Joined: 12/28/2004
From: Newcastle, Australia
Status: offline
I'll just say the obvious in that all relationships require work from both parties and you need to strike a balance between the obligations and expectations of M/s or D/s with the realities of your everyday life situations.

If you're both working long hours, you're both gonna be tired and needing your own space to re-charge. I think any worthwhile Master would understand that of his slave. I know I'm grumpy when in need of rest and I want my girl to get her rest as a consequence....

Modern western lifestyle often necessitates a two income relationship and it's inevitable strain on free time and temperament - especially if kids are part of the equation, too! I think successful relationships endeavour to make personal time for each other and that's where M/s intimacy is best focused. You can still accommodate your rules and rituals within everyday life; just make sure you have that personal time to reinforce your respective roles with each other.

If it's just about income and paying bills, your life sucks and is unsustainable. Everyone needs an outlet or something will give, often irretrievably. You MUST make time (and allowances) for yourselves *and* each other no matter what the relationship dynamic....

Focus.

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 17
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 4:10:51 PM   
fyreredsub


Posts: 3403
Joined: 10/7/2005
Status: offline
i guess i'm truly blessed Master gave me an order to my life
1. Mom
2. woman
3. slave

if and when we ever get to in the same home fulltime, i will have alot more responsibility as to his needs/pampering but Master is most fair and generous. the rest of the day to day stuff wouldnt really be any different than it is as as single-parent. i do it all now,just throw in dishes and laundry for one more.

_____________________________

"Accordingly, men must then either fulfill their nature, or deny it, and in denying their nature, deny us ours, for ours is the complement to theirs. " Renegades

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 18
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 5:18:27 PM   
passionfirenmo


Posts: 38
Joined: 10/10/2005
Status: offline
Focus50,
I could not have said it better,,,,
Every relationship requires Balance,,,If it is to ever have a chance to thrive.

(in reply to Focus50)
Profile   Post #: 19
RE: More newbie thoughts... - 12/25/2005 5:38:36 PM   
EV


Posts: 7
Status: offline
quote:

ORIGINAL: Crazytwice

A.) He is "pussified", if you will, which I know is another thread but I had to add my 2 cents.
I think the pussification of the American male is greatly influenced by economics).

B.) OK, back on track. Given that a couple may be in it for the long haul, a lifetime commitment as the goal, how does a master/slave relationship address the problems inherent in unequal division of labor?

C.) I would resent having to meet my dom's needs while my own needs ( rest, for example), were left unmet.


D.) ".... is a master/slave relationship an ideal, a power greater than ourselves? Am I expected to set aside my own needs to meet those of one who is perfectly capable of tending to himself? Someone who is, after all, just another man, with the same frailties, limitations, needs, and desires as myself?


CT



CT


It seems as if you are somewhat confused between your needs and wants. You seem further confused by the influence of Feminism vs Economics on the society.

A.) Briefly, you misunderstand the infulence of the feminist movement on the US relationship landscape.

B.) Pre 1970, almost all couples were "in it for the long haul"... this concept of "may be in it for the long haul" is a post feminist fabrication. The question of female opsions to marriage was constructed to specifially "destruct" male female relationships.

The mighty power of "the movement" was witness between 1967 - 2000 via a steadily increasing divorce rate. The divorce rate (for whites) in 1960 was less than 4 percent. By 1980, the divorce rate (for whites) had surpassed 50%. The rate for blacks is now near a staggering 80%.

C.) IF you resent having to serve a man over yourself, then serving is not for you. Do not try to bend the rules. Simply accept and bow out.

You, as many other females, fail to understand and fully appreciate that a male's job is actually to give his life to a femal. Males have done so, almost unconditionally, from the beginning of history until recent times.

The experiments is "social engineering" of the last 40 years, aka the woman's movement, has failed. The American culture is now dividide between those women who are seeking independence and those who are looking to give up the pain of singleness and therefor independence to a more traditional life.

YOU can NOT enter a traditional male - female relationship with the baggage of the movement still in your mindset. That will create nothing but chaos, which some males may actually THRILL in removing from you.... but many will not be able to appreciate.

D.) You are expected to give fuly of yourself as a Master gives of himself. IF you don't understand that... you should rethink everything about what D/s actually is.



EV

Miami

(in reply to Crazytwice)
Profile   Post #: 20
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>
All Forums >> [Community Discussions] >> General BDSM Discussion >> More newbie thoughts... Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy

0.094