FirmhandKY
Posts: 8948
Joined: 9/21/2004 Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: housesub4you Jeez there is an excuse for everything. So your claim was proven false, but now you claim "it's only from memory" You said at first my link did not mention the party, I proved you wrong when I pointed out you used a different source and in my source it was 11th line. We all see what we choose to see, at times I will be wrong at times I will be right, but at least I compare apples to apples My primary "claim" was that the party of the governor was not mentioned in the lede of the story referenced in the OP. You seemed to not know what the term "lede" meant, so I gave you a link to several definitions, along with the lede of the particular story in question. You did not prove my comment false. What you did attempt to do was not address my point at, but make unsourced claims about another case and different stories. Since then, you've been engaged in an attempt to muddy the waters without anything other than "nah, you're wrong". I'm not convinced you really care one way or the other, and I'm not interested in spending hours and days in googling and posting links to stories to someone whose point of view is likely not open to facts. As I recommended, simply look at the issue of party identification as you read any news story, and see, over time, if you notice a trend. On "this side", we call this intellectual exercise "name that party". It's an interesting game, and I'll let any other reader draw their own conclusions over time. Whether you draw the same conclusions I have, is - of course - open to question, along with whatever cognitive bias you may be prey to. Firm PS. On rereading, I may have mingled Mgrigs with you. Sorry if so, but you both seem to be pretty much talking the same line, so I'm not inclined to modify my comments.
< Message edited by FirmhandKY -- 12/11/2008 8:16:53 AM >
_____________________________
Some people are just idiots.
|