RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Casual Banter] >> Off the Grid



Message


came4U -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/16/2008 9:36:27 AM)

quote:

It's funny because I have never had a devout catholic answer me with my question. 


I am not sure (I'd have to read the whole thing over) if anyone who replied so far is Catholic at all. Maybe they read but didn't post.
Come out, come out wherever you are!!




HunterS -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/16/2008 10:45:43 AM)

FR
If Catholics were to start giving the same respect that they demand then they might have a right to bitch. 
I was raised as a Roman Catholic and was a half click from becoming a Jesuit priest.  I could see no connection between this picture and the "mother of Jesus".  If on the other hand they had put a nude "lady of Guadalupe" on the cover that would,at least, give credence to any opposition.  It would also get me to drive down to Tiajuana and buy up a buttload of copies as an investment.
 
H.




sirsholly -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/16/2008 11:46:51 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: came4U

quote:

It's funny because I have never had a devout catholic answer me with my question. 


I am not sure (I'd have to read the whole thing over) if anyone who replied so far is Catholic at all. Maybe they read but didn't post.
Come out, come out wherever you are!!

i am an ex-catholic, thought how devout was questionable.

In answer to the Darks question...i honestly do not think you ever will get an answer.
When i thought about how, as a catholic, i would answer you, my answer was embarrassing to me. The only one that i could come up with, and perchance i am not the only one to have this answer, is "Because the Pope said so."
It is difficult to display that amount of ignorance...yet what other answer is there?
The Vatican does not provide reasons for their mandates.




came4U -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/16/2008 12:20:05 PM)

To comment on tsatske's last remark, I can't say bigotry towards the black population (can't call them African Americans) in Canada is much of an issue.  I can only correlate the similarity of what our government and the Catholic church did to our native Indians and how some have become quite rightfully disturbed adults or caregivers because of the abuse inflicted.  Some natives did though also continue within the given religion and most only out of a sense of guilt (again, stemming from c-hood abuse).

Given that scenerio maybe mockery at the Church can be a healing choice for many? A freedom maybe.  Who knows.




HunterS -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/16/2008 1:49:35 PM)

quote:

Tell me your are joking..."it's not Mary"...than who is it? 
It's unmistakingly a charictature of the Virgin Mary...and more specifically, Mary of Guadalupe, the virgin that Mexicans adore, not as a Goddess but as the Mothe of Jesus. 
Perhaps you should google up a pic of the virgin of Guadalupe.  Then you would see there is not the slightest resemblence between the pic on Playboy and the virgin of Guadalupe.
For a catholic you do not seem to know much about the icons of your religion.
 
 
 I don't have to explain or justify my religious beliefs to anyone, and my beliefs should be totally irrelevant you your pursuit of happiness.  However,  don't attack my religion, treat a woman we believe is the Mother of God like a "secretary"...or like a "Hybrid Goddess"
To use your own words I do not have to justify my beliefs to you and my beliefs are that pointing out the undisputed facts  about your religion are totally irrelevant to your pursuit of happiness.
 
 
...Maybe it would be interesting to see a picture of Moses or Abraham with his cock dangling and a rosebud up his ass...and see how lovely that would appear to those of the Jewish faith, or Mohammed on his knees doing it doggie style.
I don't have a problem with that.  If you read the Koran you will find that Mohamed recomends sex with ...(persons not allowed by the TOS to be discussed on this forum)
 
 
 
   We have had the crucifix in piss, and all sorts of horrible images of Christian icons, and everyone just laughs.  Well fuck em...
Should we fuck em just like Torquemada fucked about 14 million Jews durring the inquisition?  Just one example I can supply more if you want.  Perhaps you are content with the way that the Catholic church treated the native Americans in Cuba,Mexico,Peru etc.
 
 Like Peter, I would draw my sword and cut off not the ear but something a little lower down. 
In direct contradiction to Jesus's admonition to Peter....I am confused here you would do something that Jesus specifically forbade just because you have your knickers in a bunch.
 
 CM is no place to argue religion. 
Why not?  This is the off topic section of the forum.  If you feel incompitent to discuss this question in a civil fashion perhaps you should not participate.
 
 This is not what I am here for..but this thread has pushed a button and has been allowed to continue.
While I am sorry that you are offended consider also that many things you say others might find equally offensive and so far as I know no one has offered to cut off any of your appendages
No one forced you to join this forum and no one is forcing you to continue your membership. 




tsatske -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 7:43:38 AM)

Why Catholics pray to the saints:

In order to hear the answer to this question, you must first accept that I am not prostelyzing at you. Therefore, you do not need to ask yourself, 'do i believe this and want to convert', only to accept that different people believe different things and do whatever judging or hearing of the answer you do, from that standpoint.

The Bible, which is the holy book for many Christians, is not static, but is viewed, or interpreted, very differently, by different religions, different cultures and different times. I am not asking you to change your interpretation or view, simply giving you someone else's.

Many Catholics are unwilling to answer questions like this because they are usually asked by Fundamentalist Protestants, who will reject their answers since they come from a different religious view. Many of those asking are Solo Scriptura in their beliefs, and yet, at the same time, reject the Apocrophia, so any quoting from the Apacrophia, will be blasted down. Likewise, even using the part of the Bible which the Protestants accept, Marian quotes will get the Catholic told that they are misinterpreting to the point of inviting damnation. Such responses do not encourage open communication, so many simply do not answer.
And, honestly, far too many Catholic children are raised without good grounding in their faith and are simply told, 'the pope said so.' So they may not have an answer for you.

The Pope, and, the Catholic Church, have never commanded worship of (not what is done, btw) or prayer to (that is what is done - petition and supplication) any saint or belief in any apparition. They declare someone a Saint, (making them an 'exceptional saint', meaning, a person who's sainthood has been declared 'worthy of belief'), it is still acceptable for an individual Catholic to disagree that thatperson was a saint, though they would have to have some pretty strong reasoning - after all, the Pope was pretty certain that person was a saint. (A saint is someone who entered heaven directly upon death, without stopping in Purgatory. My daughter, for instance.)

An example would be the Sainted Little Therese of Lisieux - The Little Flower. Considered by many childhood sexual abuse survivors to be their Patron saint, other survivors are hugely insulted by that choice. (the Vatican does not hand out patron Saints, btw. groups chose them for themselves. I mean, there is a Patron Saint of the Mafia. Do you think the pope was sitting around one day and said, 'oo... you know who needs a patron saint? The Mafia')

So... a Catholic CAN pray to a saint - it is in no way required. Now, why would they?
I think even most Protestant would agree that one thing that people can certainly do in Heaven is pray (or worship).
Every Protestant I know understands the concept of a prayer circle. There is no reason I can not pray for myself, and yet, when I feel strongly that I am, as the old song goes, 'Standing in the need of Prayer', I call my friends, I call my church and ask to be put on the prayer chain - apparently, it will have some effect, to pelt heaven with MORE prayers.
That is ALL that prayer to a Saint can accomplish. Saints have NO supernatural power of their own - all they can do is pray for you. The Bible says, 'The prayers of a good man go far' certainly the Saints are GOOD people. So we ask them to pray for us.
That is the most classic form of prayer to the Virgin (after the Rosery, of course) - 'Intercede for us, on our behalf, with your Son, dear Mother...'
I am not Catholic, BTW, though I have Catholic children (adult children, o Mods). I am Quaker, but I do tend to be very Marian. I do not get this Protestant idea that 'The Bible makes no difference between Mary and any other woman.' To this end, they can generally quote ONE verse - 'get away from me, woman' - when Jesus feared His mother's pleas were interfering with his path.
But how about 'When Jesus saw His mother and the disciple there whom He loved, he said to His mother, "Woman, behold your son." Then He said to the disciple, "Behold, your mother".
I attended my sister's Fundamentalist Baptist church on the first Sunday of Advent. The cover of the bulletin sported the verses of the Rosary, from G-d only knows what translation, because they didn't want it to sound like the Rosary. 'Blessed are thou amongst women, and Blessed is the fruit of thy womb, Jesus Christ'
of course, as a Quaker, the sermon kind of got to me, too. My Uncle, the Minister, chose to preach on how it bothered him that people use 'Thee' And 'Thou' and such when praying, and in Hymns. Really? Kind of bothers me that anyone would ever say 'I love you', to their nearest and most loved, instead of 'I love thee'. Makes almost no linguistic sense.




Mercnbeth -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 8:18:01 AM)

~ Fast Reply ~
 
As a devout ex-Catholic with 16 years of Catholic education in my portfolio; 'Saints' were created for marketing purposes. Per 'Dogma', not the movie version, there are 'saints' and then there are 'Saints'. Everyone who dies in a 'state of grace' goes to heaven and is a 'saint'. If you have good 'press' you can become a 'Saint'. A 'Saint' has been credited with three miracles. He/she are then nominated for sainthood and 'beatified'. Next the prospective Saint goes through a vetting process with a committee set up to dig up the dirt on you and the adversary known as the 'Devil's Advocate', giving the reasons why you should NOT be a 'Saint'. Pass all the scrutiny and you get the capital 'S' designation.

The money is good! Last time we were in Rome, there was a beatification ceremony. Four nondescript individuals were up for consideration. With modern technology its not so easy to get miracles credited anymore; even Pope JP II and Mother Theresa are having difficulty. But they had 4 and it filled the Vatican with tourists coming from the parts of the world where these prospective Saints originated. It was a great party full of festivities with a few self flagellates attracting the old school S&M crowd nurtured during the formative years of  the golden age of torture - the Inquisition. Once a Saint, the franchise moves locally with a percentage of the 'take' going to the world headquarters in Rome. 

Now any knowledgeable Catholic will tell you that you do NOT pray to a Saint. You pray so the Saint will intercede with God on your behalf. Put in modern USA context, Saints are Heaven's lobbyists for God. Now what better lobbyist than God's mom? It would be like going to Momma Bush asking her to ask the President for a favor, or going to Monica Lewinsky to bring up your personal issue to President Clinton after he was enjoying an after blow job cigar. Saints are considered to have God's ear, or can get priority for a meeting. Mary gets to see him every Sunday for dinner; "Hey Jesus, Merc was praying the other day and said he needs a couple extra bucks how about letting him win the lottery?"

Now if you want to get into the whole Jesus is God designation within the Catholic Church you have to go back and do a LOT of studying about the convention where that took place - the Council of Nicea. If was a great concept that the ruling class of the time came up with in order to centralize power. The politicians of their time needed absolute authority along with a theme. Jesus' Deity became the theme and the majority of the ignorant masses bought into it. Through that convention political power was centralized and family/nation kingdoms established which lasted until WWI. Very similar to the modern day version of a similar 'faith based' theme having similar political consequences - Global Warming. Who knows, after he's dead (martyred?) Al Gore may be a 'Saint'.




chezzy71 -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 8:57:31 AM)

I am Catholic but i am also Southern Baptist and most likely will become a pagan when all is said and done but the question should be ..when is enough,enough??How far must one be provocative enough and push something far enough when we all just raise our hands??Let's not mince words here,the image was intended for all of us to look at it as Mary Mother of God.Now you don't have to believe in Mary or God.Does anyone think a good comparison are all thosegreedy SOB's on Wall Street.Is there a monetary figure that anyone can state where enough is enough??Of course not we live in a Capitalistic society...keep up with the Jones's and so on.Well,you see where that has taken us.Cannot the same be said for all this "interpretation??It's an artists rendering...i am sick of all of it because that answer surely is BS.I am also sick of people claimng i have no right to beef because the Pope and the Catholic Church did this,this and that.It offended me enough to say my piece.Now i may not take a sword and chop everyone's heads off but i do believe i have a right to complain about it regardless of what the Pontiff says or what a bunch of disgusting grown men cannot do, which was keep their snake in their trousers.And yes ya'll have the right to speak your peice as well...just allow me mine without a furor over my choice of word.




Raechard -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 9:03:14 AM)

It's a publicity exercise it only fails if you ignore it, if people get all offended by it they just fuel it some more.




LaTigresse -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 9:05:32 AM)

The funny thing, if no one had gotten upset, few of us would have ever known.........

What a great way to sell magazines!




philosophy -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 9:09:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske


it is still acceptable for an individual Catholic to disagree that thatperson was a saint, though they would have to have some pretty strong reasoning - after all, the Pope was pretty certain that person was a saint.


....interesting post. This one thing stood out to me though. Did they repeal Papal infallibility then?




sirsholly -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 9:10:40 AM)

quote:

ORIGIONAL:Mercnbeth

You pray so the saint will intercede with God on your behalf


Good post and i am not arguing with the above statememt, as it does ring a bell. But to me it is as idiotic as telling your sins to a priest so that he can intercede. The vatican teaches that God needs a middleman? Really? Then does the vatican also teach their followers that THEIR prayers directly to God are a waste of time? Perchance the vatican should teach the catholics to find a priest (hopefully one of the non child molesting ones) and drop to their knees and pray to him...so he can intercede.

That is not just breaking the commandment...it is shattering it




Mercnbeth -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 9:42:58 AM)

This reply is based upon 'faith based' belief that you really want to know...
quote:

The vatican teaches that God needs a middleman?
No. It suggests that because of the 'pious' lives they've led 'Saints' can expedite prayer requests.  
quote:

Really?
Yes.
quote:

Then does the vatican also teach their followers that THEIR prayers directly to God are a waste of time?
No. There are two problems with your question. First, its out of the context of time. The teachings of the Vatican only have a problem because they haven't updated from when they were established. They were written for a ignorant populous who wouldn't be able to formulate such a question in their mind. Focus was on satisfying their hunger, their thirst, and trying to stay warm and dry. ALL extra time was suppose to be spent serving God, whose representation on earth was the 'One True Religion' - Roman Catholicism.

The second problem is in applying logic and asking questions. Doing so, back in the day, was a clear path to seeing the Grand Inquisitor.

Look Nietzsche is quoted as saying something along the lines that "God is dead". He didn't say it was necessarily a good thing. As 'god' has died, lower case, because the reference is to organized religion, NOT God-like in any case; the vacuum created had to be filled. The masses need a 'god'. They need order and something  to apply their faith outside the reality they face in daily life. They need something/someone to believe in without requiring substantive facts, along with someone to blame - a 'devil'. Ergo the 'religion' of Scientology, Global Warming, Democrat, Republican, Liberal, Conservative, Right, Left, Communism, Capitalism. Apply the same standards for 'faith' and you see very little difference. ALL are based upon 'belief'.

Formal Religion may be out of vogue but that need for humans to have faith didn't disappear. A major cause is if there wasn't a 'devil' to blame, and a 'god' to pray to for help - the only person left to blame or credit is yourself. Obviously few want that responsibility, so instead they are 'religious'.




kittinSol -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 10:01:57 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: chezzy71
I am Catholic but i am also Southern Baptist


Only in America [:D] .




RCdc -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 10:04:32 AM)

This is kind of a fast reply but I also wanted to thank tsatske and Mercnbeth(I believe it's Merc answering) big loved up thanks for attempting to respond.  I do understand where you are coming from and yes, this is an answer that I have had before, but it still fails - for me - to answer why people idolize certain specific people.  I understand that they give a sense of a pathway, but why specifically iodolize them?  I am pretty much of the thought that it is as Merc stated - 'that knowledgable catholics do not pray to, but use as an intercede'(hope I got that correct) and that as in any religon, there are those that step that bit further.
 
One question it raises for me though, is a little further on Merc on something you said.  I will quote it here.

quote:

 It suggests that because of the 'pious' lives they've led 'Saints' can expedite prayer requests.  


I struggle so much with this from my perspective.  No human is better than another, in the eyes of god.  Even the most inhuman and violent person can, via accepting jesus, 'be saved' should his heart be open to god and repentant at the end of his life (so the teachings go).  So this is where I find the thought that a saint can basically fastrack to god over a basically good human being seems absurb to me, when jesus' taught equality.
 
the.dark.




tsatske -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 11:14:27 AM)

quote:

....interesting post. This one thing stood out to me though. Did they repeal Papal infallibility then?


The Pope, as a man, is not infallable. Papal infallability refers to issues of faith, Dogma, which are uttered 'from Peter's throne'. Since this is, to the best of my knowledge, a metephorical throne, there is sometimes debate as to rather a certain statement is 'infallable' or not.
You will sometimes here Catholics say things, when they do not like the current pope, for instance, like, 'The Church has had bad Popes before, and survived.' If they viewed the MAN as infallible, how could there be a Bad Pope? The issue is, when speaking under certain conditions, it is not Him speaking, but God, speaking through Him, to the Faithful.
There are learned scholars who talk about rather something has the earmarks of God's hand, in a given statement.
Stating that an apperation, or a person's sainthood, is 'worthy of belief', is never issued as an infallible statement.
The limits of infallability can explain how Catholics can state that the core of Catholic religion has never changed, and is unchangable as God. Catholic Law can change - for instance, not allowing priest to marry is Law, and could change.
Dear Darkness, I really am going to get back to you on the other side, I promise.




RCdc -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 11:44:56 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: tsatske
Dear Darkness, I really am going to get back to you on the other side, I promise.


It's all cool tsatske - where ever you feel most comfortable - I get you don't want to hijack.
 
the.dark.




sirsholly -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 11:46:11 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mercnbeth

This reply is based upon 'faith based' belief that you really want to know...
quote:

The vatican teaches that God needs a middleman?
No. It suggests that because of the 'pious' lives they've led 'Saints' can expedite prayer requests.  
quote:

Really?
Yes.

So the vatican takes a mortal, elevates him/her to sainthood and tells you that to speed things up, you go through them. I cannot help but wonder how God feels about this one.





LaTigresse -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 12:28:48 PM)

Sooo, the view is that perhaps God won't think your request is worth listening to so you suck up to a saint, get the saint to plead your case to God, and voila', maybe you will get what you want?

I don't know why but that concept never dawned on my and now that I've read it, I am laughing unreasonably hard here. Saints are nothing more than customer service reps for a company called "God".




philosophy -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/17/2008 12:31:13 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: LaTigresse

Saints are nothing more than customer service reps for a company called "God".



...actually more like lobbyists......

"you want God to approve drilling for oil in Alaska? Slip us a few prayers and I'll see what can be done. I have the ear of the movers and shakers you know...."




Page: <<   < prev  3 4 5 [6] 7   next >   >>

Valid CSS!




Collarchat.com © 2025
Terms of Service Privacy Policy Spam Policy
0.046875