came4U -> RE: Playboy's nude Virgin Mary (12/13/2008 11:29:49 PM)
|
Yes,I don't honestly care what the Vatican thinks either. The come much too late in their pious opionions, you are correct. Personally, it crosses a line. It is not only that they depict the Holy Mother as 'beautiful', it is the beauty of her in body, not spirit ideology, but that it is blasphamy to associate her at all in the business of (soft) pornography in general. This was NO mistake, this is big business, a corporation of SMART people who would never miskake a visible comparason like this. No painted picture or statue in history has been seen more by anyone in any nation more than pictures depicting J or M. No way in hell did anyone along the heirarchy of the magazine (from model selection, location, props, makeup, photographer, editing and printing) not notice the controversy through insult it would cause. I thought the entertainer Madonna was bad. [8|] This isn't a matter of religion vs taste. It is merely a test to see (exactly what you said)..quote:
I think that issue will sell twice as much as normal. just how many issues sold proves the point that Godlessness is the best thing since sliced bread. My disappointment isn't with the smut industry, it is with those that fund it.
|
|
|
|